257

US business leaders are spending big on Donald Trump’s second inaugural fund, which is predicted to exceed even the record-setting $107m raised in 2017.

The donations, which are not restricted by campaign finance laws, come as industries and business leaders seek to curry favor with the incoming administration after the president-elect decisively won a second, non-consecutive term in November.

Some of the planned donations reportedly include $1m each from Jeff Bezos’s Amazon, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Facebook parent company Meta, led by Mark Zuckerberg.

Hedge-fund manager Ken Griffin has said he plans to donate $1m, Bloomberg reported; Uber and its CEO Dara Khosrowshahi are reported to be chipping in $1m each; and Toyota, Ford and General Motors are each peeling off $1m. Ford is also reportedly coupling its donation with a fleet of vehicles.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 81 points 1 year ago

“EVERYBODY WANTS TO BE MY FRIEND!!!” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social on Thursday.

lmfao

What a fucking idjit.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 17 points 1 year ago

He is. He is also the one getting paid, so he's not alone.

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago
[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago
[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

This is way less than 10%. He's a bargain.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The percentage isn't the point. The amount is. It's telling the world who is under his thumb.

[-] Bacano@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Did you ... Did you donate $420,000.69 to my inauguration fund?

[-] Blackout@fedia.io 35 points 1 year ago

Overthrowing a democracy is expensive

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Pretty cheap if you're a billionaire

[-] Blackout@fedia.io 8 points 1 year ago

That's because they socialize the cost.

[-] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago

I guess this is how we make a list.

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Why is it trump’s fund? I thought musk was the president

[-] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

It must be like the charity bowl they put out at events. Musk doesn't need the money but Trump is desperate for it.

[-] WeUnite@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

He's acting president.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Anyone got a full list? Asking for a friend...

[-] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Jeff Bezos (Amazon), Sam Altman (OpenAi), Mark Zuckerberg (Meta), Dara Khosrowshahi (Uber), Jim Loree (Black and Decker), Toyota, Ford, General Motors, Intuit, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America and many other undisclosed in the article.

The part particularly concerning to me is

Trump aides have indicated that the fundraising isn’t about the money but a symbolic means to exact an apology for any previous perceived lapse of loyalty.

a very fascist wording. You don't have to be "loyal" to the President, unless he's a dictator.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Heh. I only use one of those. Time to make a change, then.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Will they be paying people to fill the mall during the inauguration this time?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

No need to pay when you can force them at gunpoint.

[-] beansbeansbeans@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's the only way they'll get anyone to show up. And with how fragile his ego is, this is likely high on his list.

It'll be hilarious if the crowd is even smaller than last time.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 year ago

To be fair, they didn't start the tradition of having ridiculous expensive coronation ceremonies paid with legalized bribes every four years. And even that is just a symptom of the monarchical nature of the US presidency.

[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

RIP US democracy.

[-] JiveTurkey@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

One more reason to hate these guys.

[-] hightrix@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All these rich guys are donating the same amount? Yeah, that doesn’t feel like a donation but more like a purchase/fee/protection money.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago
[-] Zier@fedia.io 11 points 1 year ago

Dumb Donnie will keep most of the money and everyone will get 1 cocktail weenie as a snack. Fleecing the idiots is his job.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

They donate to every inauguration. Apparently that's traditional. Expecting billionaires to show spine here is to expect them to go against their financial interests. They wouldn't be billionaires of they were willing to do that.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Yes. But your statement seeks to normalize trump as any other president. He is not.

The point isn't that they've given before, it's that they are giving to him, now, with all of his clearly stated intent to harm people and American democracy.

Meta is least surprising, they hired one of the actual authors of Project 2025 and he still works there today AFAIK.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it's useful for people to consider that he's not that out of the ordinary. Instead he's just blatantly transparent, whereas others have been more covert. E.g. Reagan did receive a handbook from the Heritage Foundation. He implemented 60% of it within a year. That's the same Heritage Foundation that produced Project 2025. I think understanding that could help people look for solutions that stop perpetuating the ordinary that's gotten us to where we are today. And yes, of course there are differences between any two candidates or presidents, some significant in the way they affect the majority. Placed on a timeline however, they seem more like slight changes on the trend line towards a strong oligarchy.

[-] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Indeed, here are some of the donors for the Obama inauguration: https://www.opensecrets.org/obama/inaug.php

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Take down those names.

this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
257 points (98.1% liked)

News

37583 readers
258 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS