80

Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives on Friday turned to a new strategy in a long-shot bid to prevent the fourth government shutdown in a decade, as time runs short ahead of a Sept. 30 deadline,” Reuters reports.

“Instead, they will prepare four separate spending bills, most of which reflect the deep cuts sought by the party’s right flank. Those are certain to be rejected by the Democratic-controlled Senate, as they are far below spending levels outlined in a deal with Democratic President Joe Biden earlier this year.”

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Veraxus@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago

Phrased another way: "Republicans once again hold a gun to the countries head."

"Let us cut some fingers off!" they demand. "If you don't, we'll shoot the country right in the head!"

And, of course, this will all somehow be painted as the Democrats fault.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Voters always blame the Republican party when they do this

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

All McCarthy has to do is negotiate. Not with his party, with the Democrats. That's it. Do it, you spineless bastard.

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

If he does that, he loses his job almost instantly. Literally all he cares about is keeping the Speaker job for as long as possible.

[-] Burninator05@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Either I'm misremebering things or everyone else is.

If i remember correctly, part of his deal to become Speaker was reducing the number of Reps required to force a vote for a new Speaker to one. Meaning any single member can force votes for a new Speaker. You know if he negotiates with Dems one of the crazies in his own party will force voting on a new Speaker.

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Yep, that’s why I said he’d lose his job instantly. Alleged sex trafficker Matt Gaetz has explicitly threatened to submit the motion to vacate the Speakership if McCarthy works with Dems at all.

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Gaetz is a paper tiger. Who else are they going to find to push around?

[-] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

If he can negotiate an ounce of support from the Democrats, Gaetz/Greene's threats become meaningless. They can call for his removal and then get immediately shot down

[-] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago
[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

If he had brains or balls, he could also negotiate with Dems to lend him 6 votes to keep him to the office

[-] slumlordthanatos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's just kicking the can down the road.

Sure, he might keep his Speaker job for now, but he'll get primaried the instant he's up for reelection.

He's damned if he does, and damned even quicker if he doesn't. And even if he cuts a deal with Democrats, GOP crazies will just spend all of their time forcing new votes for Speaker.

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

He wanted the job. He knew or should have known it was a trap. I have zero sympathy for him. (I know you don't either, I'm just tired of the bullshit from that party.)

He's GOP. They're all damned.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I know. He's power hungry and he doesn't care if he wrecks the nation as long as he gets to keep his job.

[-] takeda@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What good is that position if he doesn't have any power and only does what few people tell him to?

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

He’s hoping to cash out with a book deal or a cushy job with a lobbying group, think tank, or right-wing media outlet.

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

usual republican clown show. How about upping tax on the ultra wealthy and make them pay their fair share.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 32 points 1 year ago

Still not a strategy.

[-] thorbot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

At first I read "house republicans try to get shot" and I got excited

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world -1 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON, Sept 22 (Reuters) - Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives on Friday turned to a new strategy in a long-shot bid to prevent the fourth government shutdown in a decade, as time runs short ahead of a Sept. 30 deadline.

They are certain to be rejected by the Democratic-controlled Senate, as they are far below spending levels outlined in a deal with Democratic President Joe Biden earlier this year.

You need the time to fund the government while you pass all the appropriations bills," he said, adding that he thought the main focus of the overall spending fight should be new immigration controls on the border.

The House Rules Committee is scheduled to meet at 1 p.m. (1700 GMT) to consider the four bills, which would fund the military, homeland security, agriculture programs, the State Department and other foreign operations for the full fiscal year.

On Thursday, the House blocked a procedural vote on an $886 billion defense spending bill, as five Republicans joined Democrats to capsize it.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a Democrat, has scheduled a procedural vote on Tuesday evening to advance a stopgap funding bill.


The original article contains 444 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 57%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
80 points (94.4% liked)

politics

19097 readers
1693 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS