Eggs would be more akin to a fetus than raw chicken.
Maybe setup a food truck across the street making breakfast sandwiches and see how many of those protestors buy. Then donate all the profits to the clinic.
Yeah, but even these assholes wouldn't be dumb enough to mistake an egg for an aborted human fetus; some minced chicken entrails, though, that they might actually fall for.
I like the cut of your jibs
That was a wild ride, but it stuck the landing.
What's the deal with Tumblr screenshots always including replies that add nothing to the humor lol
It’s basically a laugh track for the meme
redditors adding "nobody:" to the top of every meme
Nobody:
Redditors: Adding "nobody:" to the top of every meme
FTFY
That's good. I wanted to call them "useless red circles" in my comment but I didn't know if anyone would get what I meant
Ah, a fellow Eternity enjoyer.
this confused me and i am on a whole different app
Yeah, what's up with that?
What's the deal with laugh tracks?
👆 this.
I'll include you both when I post this to my Lemmy community on Tumblr!
I mean the title question would be super illegal. The thing he did is probably fine if its in a bag and especially fine if he didnt hit anyone with it.
It probably could constitute assault, even without hitting someone
I'd say about the same level of assault than the christians gathering to call other people murderers.
It's too bad the 'powers that be' will probably get really mad something was thrown near their sister or something
Unfortunately, "they deserved it" isn't really part of the law.
I propose we pass a law that officially makes "he needed killin' " a legally admissible affirmative defense. If you can prove to the jury, beyond a reasonable doubt, that someone just needed killin', you can't be convicted of murder.
I'm sure this won't have any horrific negative side effects whatsoever...
Well tbf cops already do that and it's going as well as you expect it to
Nah cops don't need to justify their murders to get away with them
Don't be so sure about that, consider that raw chicken will be a good carrier for diseases. On the other hand, if those christians aren't vaccinated they would also qualify for this.
It's biological material too which often has legal implications.
yeah, battery
Throwing something at a person is battery, pretty much everywhere in the US.
You could also make an argument that it's "discharging bodily fluids" or some weird kind of "disturbing the peace" type of offense predicated just on disturbing other people around you, but it definitely would be battery.
What if you throw a car battery at someone? Is that double battery?
Battery^2^
That's a AA battery
Only if the battery is charged
Are they discharged if it's not?
So the real question is whether it's illegal to throw a baggie full of raw chicken.
You’d probably get prosecuted for terrorism if you tried that, just on vibes
Legend.
The hero we didn't know we needed, we didn't know we had.
To the original question:
Would that be considered desecrating a corpse?
It depends on the age of the fetus, and the local laws. In the Netherlands where I live the fetus is by law not considered a baby (not sure on the terminology) until the 24th week of pregnancy, so anything before that is considered not to be a human body (again, by law).
LoL.
What is this site.
RIP Yahoo Answers
They need to do way instain mother> who kill thier babbys, becuse these babby cant fright back? It was on the news this mroing a mother in ar who had kill her three kids, they are taking the three babby back to new york too lady to rest. my pary are with the father who lost his chrilden ; i am truley sorry for your lots
PREGANANANT
A joke. It isn't supposed to be believable.
The proportion of users that don't recognize Yahoo Answers will only increase :(
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
Related communities:
