808
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Multiple polls show that a significant portion of Americans oppose Elon Musk’s influence in government, particularly through DOGE.

A CBS/YouGov poll found that nearly half of respondents want Musk to have little or no influence, with opinions split along party lines.

Other polls from The Economist, Quinnipiac, and advocacy groups also reveal broad concerns over Musk’s power and lack of oversight.

Meanwhile, the White House continues to defend Musk and selectively highlight poll results that support Trump’s administration while ignoring criticism.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 210 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A CBS/YouGov poll found that nearly half of respondents want Musk to have little or no influence, with opinions split along party lines.

"Nearly half"

"opinions split along party lines"

So the Republicans are still bootlicking fascism. Nothing has changed. There's no mass outcry from people who just now realized it.

It's the same 'nearly half' of the country that's sane.

[-] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago

Even if there was, it wouldn't stop what's happening. The current administration gives no fucks about public opinion. If they did they wouldn't have repeatedly lied in their campaign nor would they be following the largely unpopular Project 2025

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/poll-project-2025-broadly-known-severely-unpopular-voters-rcna172660

What we can do about it is start forming mutual aid networks and unions. These will help us form a cohesive front against the fast forming authoritarian government that's being installed.

If anyone wants resources to learn more about this you can find a rough draft here.

https://lemmy.world/comment/14977955

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Paddzr@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Nearly half is closer than what the presidential elections were... So, progress?

You have found the tinfoil lining in this cloud. You're right though, progress is progress.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 69 points 1 week ago

Unless someone is going to enforce consequences on them they don't care if 100% of the population disagree with them.

Trump can't legally get elected again and Musk wasn't elected at all, why the fuck would they care what the public thinks?

[-] prayer@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

Trump can't legally get elected again

Trump can't legally sexually assault women, but that still happened. We'll see how this plays out.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Either way, public opinion no longer matters to him unless there are actual consequences attached.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Traister101@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago

Hah! Elections you think we'll be getting more of those at this rate?

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

So again, no reason for them to care if they are unpopular.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 66 points 1 week ago

A CBS/YouGov poll found that nearly half of respondents want Musk to have little or no influence, with opinions split along party lines.

So literally what any of us would have predicted as the outcome to this poll, and it doesn't matter anyhow, because Trump is fully in "whatever, I'll do what I want" mode.

[-] meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 week ago

Musk’s DOGE crusade is the perfect allegory for late-stage oligarchy: a billionaire playing cabinet minister while polls scream 46% want him gone. The partisan split here is theater – Republicans cheering their own disenfranchisement through regulatory capture, Democrats clutching pearls they helped string.

That White House press flacks can’t confirm his security clearance while he raids Treasury datasets? Peak technofeudalism. They’re not even pretending anymore – just raw power consolidation masked as "efficiency."

Meanwhile, the Education Department "doesn’t exist" but somehow gets staffed by meme lords with racist post histories. This isn’t governance; it’s a hostile takeover using government letterhead.

[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah it's a coup. There's no getting around that this isn't the government.

Then why did they vote for or refuse to vote against him?

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago
[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago

It was clear he was part of Trump's plan so yeah, plenty of people voted for him.

That's like saying no one voted for migrant deportations because what they voted for was a person, not their program, well no, if something is part of their program then that's something you're voting for.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Read the article. The people who voted for Trump still think Musk is fine.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

That still leaves those who didn't vote against it being idiots 🤷

[-] smayonak@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Because there are propaganda networks out there and these have tried to convince their users and viewers that Elon is doing the right thing.

We can blame our judicial and legislative branches for allowing propaganda networks to be funded by oligarchs. These people too were being bankrolled by the ultra wealthy.

[-] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

People be dumb. I know I am.

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 week ago

Yes but were those polls taken on Twitter?! That's the only valid poll to Elon.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Those aren't even valid. Remember the one where he asked if he should quit being CEO and people said yes by a vast majority?

[-] Benjaben@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

LOL I forgot about that, what a dork.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago

Well, now he has driven most sane people out of the platform so if he repeats the poll he will get the result he wants!

[-] Cybersec@piefed.social 29 points 1 week ago

I’ll file this in the not helpful “hopium” or copium folder of discourse that is actually harmful to enacting change. It leads you to believe the tides are shifting in your favor and all will be ok when that’s actually not the case.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 27 points 1 week ago

I live in a solidly conservative area and I heard a surprising but also encouraging conversation this morning at the doctor's office.

When I walked in, there were a handful of folks in the waiting area and they were talking supportively of JD Vance, so presumably conservative voters. It was off putting for me and I was immediately a bit irritated that I can't even go to the doctor without having to listen to this bullshit.

But as the conversation continued, they actually started talking about how super wealthy people worth hundreds of millions aren't paying their fair share of taxes, how they're ruining towns and making middle class people pay for it, and things like that. Specifically they were talking about some of the environmental damage done to waterways by rich people (they mentioned someone specific but it wasn't a name I am familiar with and I don't recall what it was) and how the clean-up is being paid for by middle class tax payers.

So, while we might all disagree substantially on a lot of topics, I think a disdain for super wealthy / elites not paying their fair share is some common ground to build on.

[-] cmhe@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That is pretty common when you hear conservatives talk. You often agree about the issues, but then you suddenly hear crazy conspiracy theories about why everything is the fault of immigrants, jews, trans people or whatever.

When conservatives talk about the rich and powerful being bad, its often about some "globalists", "George Soros", "World Economic Forum", "Liberals", ... than just the system being bad.

That is the reason why the leftist critique should always focus on the system, not specific people or groups.

load more comments (1 replies)

You're in for 4 awesome years of Musk in the gov, champs. But hey, you voted for it, so I don't understand why are you now showing disagreement with what they told you they would do.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 30 points 1 week ago

it would seem about 60-70% of americans never have any idea what's really going on around here. you run into enough people who say shit like "i voted for trump but i'm going to vote against project 2025" that it's just astounding. so now probably 10-20% of us are gearing up for a fight for survival while 25-35% of the populace have been geared up to be the modern day brownshirts carrying out the oncoming genocide. the remaining 45-65% are just rolling along like this is all perfectly acceptable normal politics. they're acting like this is just the cost of doing business and it's not their place to do or say anything.

they're who's really responsible in all this. fuckers.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

One comment I remember from right before the election was a person saying how their cashier said “well, anybody but Biden right?” and they were like “Biden…Biden isn’t running.”

I don’t get it. I do not understand how people could be so blind to politics that they wouldn’t even know who’s running, but then I talk to real people and it’s like “oh.”

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

i just want to knows what these people do all day

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Right? To not get any news, even by accident, is wild. I know I’m in a position that sees it more, and it does rake some setup(an app or two with notifications does a lot of the heavy lifting) but I mean come on.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Ive met a couple folks who can do this, they just listen to music they have on their phone or whatever and do hobbies that dlnt require outside interaction. They are pretty much completely insular information wise and are usually a step behind for all news, they are also extremely vulnerable to right wing nonsense since they dont interact with any outside information on the regular.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago
[-] Soup@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I’m 100% certain that the “you” is directed at the republican voters. If you were one of them, then maybe the whole “Musk is going to be in charge of a new department and do all this crazy shit” somehow slipped by you, but it was definitely said very loudly.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Yeah great, but the fucking damage is done and who knows what that neo-Nazi lunatic will do with the information. I hope the NSA, CIA and FBI nab his worthless ass.

[-] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

I also want him of Earth for what it's worth. Let him pack up a Space X rocket and head to Mars. Start that colony he said we'd absolutely would have by now, because it's so easy (according to him). He's be the first person in Mars!

[-] Charlatan@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

Another pointless article.

  • Polls are crap. Who answers those calls? The same damn people over and over.
  • The results are " strong feelings" or " nearly 50%" !?!?

I usually ignore motherj articles anyway.... Guess I can keep doing that

It is what it is at this point, and as usual, Democrats will completely mis-read the room and rant about shit that won't win them the midterms. The best we can hope for is TheIdiot falling flat on his face.

[-] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Watch how quickly it takes them to do nothing at all about this.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

Yet more evidence shows Elon Musk and his cronies at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) are unpopular with many Americans.

Nearly half of people who responded to a new CBS/YouGov poll out today said they want Musk to have less influence over government spending and operations, including nearly a third who think they should have none at all. The poll found that 18 percent of respondents said that Musk and his DOGE acolytes should have “not much” influence on government operations and spending, while 31 percent said they should have none at all. Predictably, the support differed along partisan lines: Nearly three-quarters of Republicans surveyed said Musk and DOGE should have “a lot” or “some” influence, whereas more than two-thirds of Democrats said they should have “not much” or “none.”

They're really reaching with that headline. It's in the territory between clickbait and positively misleading.

[-] Vespair@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

I love these polls that report on obvious conclusions that don't require polling.

Like yeah, no shit. The problem is the people holding the reins of power couldn't give two shits what the American public wants or thinks.

[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

This is the point when asking is useless. There needs to be telling. The purest form of authority isn't going to wield itself.

[-] rickdg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

when we vote to deport grandma, lose your farm and keep prices high

[-] blakenong@lemmings.world 5 points 1 week ago

Probably shouldn’t have NOT VOTED.

[-] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Too bad we don't have a government responsive to what people want.

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Like they give a shit about polls now that they’re untouchable.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
808 points (97.5% liked)

News

25243 readers
1558 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS