🤣 😂 🤣 😂
More of this!!
Good job HUD employee...!!
👏 👏
🤣 😂 🤣 😂
More of this!!
Good job HUD employee...!!
👏 👏
In a statement, HUD spokesperson Kasey Lovett said that the stunt was “another waste of taxpayer dollars and resources” and that “appropriate action will be taken for all involved.”
I'm hearing "Pizza Party"!!!
As a taxpayer I'll decide what's a waste. This is not a waste. If I could opt in 30% of my tax dollars to efforts like this, I would.
There are three things I want my taxes to go towards:
Lol I bet more tax payer dollars would be used in investigating and punishment than what was spent on the prank. Likely the video was made at home with personal funds
Finally, a productive use for AI
Are we sure it was AI? Not just "allegedly" AI?
Unless Musk actually has two left feet, it's AI.
I haven't seen him without shoes on. ¯\(ツ)/¯
Asking the big questions: why doesn't he walk around barefoot or in flip flops?
Unless Musk actually has two left feet, it’s AI.
No, in the extended cut the camera pans out and Putin is sitting behind Musk, awaiting his turn.
(PS, AI artists get to it)
I wouldn't put it past him to have two left feet. He seems like the kind of person that would do that. Have two left feet that is...
I'm thinking about getting metal legs. It's a risky operation, but it'll be worth it...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBH9TmeJN_M
We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically-affected. We want
when they wake up in the morning, we want them not want to go to work because they are increasingly viewed as the villains. We want their funding to be shut down so that the EPA can't do all of the rules against our energy industry because they have no bandwidth financially to do so. We want to put them in trauma.
Russ Vought, current head of OPM (the federal government's "HR office"), in a 2023 talk
I'd say that he's probably successfully managed to get the "harming morale" part down, at any rate.
This particular nazi is fucking evil.
Honestly before you told me who said the quote, I was on board
/s but not really
Hooray for coal!
Now we need one showing Musk kissing Putin's butt.
The man wants to become meme? Then give it to him.
Putin sitting on Musk's face while Donald slops on his feet.
Putin-In bent over, Eyawn first, then T-Rump coming up last with his Jr. trying to take the sloppy leftovers
SHIT CENTIPEDE!!!
Now put it up in all government buildings and project it on the side of Tesla dealerships and factories
So the Rolling Stone article links to xitter over and over. Stop linking your articles to a site where content can and will be edited or removed at whim.
Anyone have a link to the video in a place other than xitter?
https://bsky.app/profile/marisakabas.bsky.social/post/3liwlwvvq6k2s
If it's still up. No direct video access without extensions though. More importantly, who is gonna spread that original file?
As long as it is available share with your friends, anyone you care about, and all the way down to those not even worth using the energy to consider your greatest enemies. Is there a strong enough long-distance projector to put this up against the Whitehouse?
Thank you!
I uploaded the video to the post itself.
Now that is funny.
Kissing Elon Musk's Feet
Misleading title, this is straight up toe sucking!
And then you feel somethin' down by your feet
It's me, it's ~~JB~~ DT, I'm suckin' upon your toes
We don't mind suckin' on toes
Good luck finding a ~~boyfriend~~ President who sucks toes
as someone with a raging foot fetish AND a raging hatred for Elon and that othrr guy, this makes me deeply uncomfortable, but I also immensely respect whoever pulled this off.
plot twist:
it was musk's own interns that did it.
Oh that’s awesome. 🤣
On a related note, I wonder whether it's actually mandatory to have that portrait of the current President hung on the wall you see in a lot of federal agencies. A lot of them do, but I don't know whether that's actually a requirement.
kagis
Looks like it isn't, that it's just a convention.
VERIFY: Are government agencies required to display portraits of current presidents?
We turned to the U.S. General Services Administration, the GSA, to verify our viewer’s question. The simple answer is no, according to the Office of Strategic Communication for GSA, which is an independent agency of the U.S. government that helps manage federal agencies.
It’s response: “There is no regulation that specifies that federal agencies must display portraits of the sitting President and Vice President in the space they occupy. However, GSA displays portraits of the President and Vice President in the public areas of the buildings that GSA owns and operates, including locations leased by GSA, where the building is fully occupied by the federal government.”
I don't know if you're likely to see Trump-kissing-Musk's-feet video displays showing up en masse, but I could certainly imagine agencies removing the portrait of Trump, if there's no requirement to display it.
Wait you display the portrait of the president in government offices? Like in North Korea? HA
Well Canada still puts the monarch up in their gov't offices.
As someone from Romania, who had that policy as well during communist times, I can say that I find that very weird as well. It's just cult of personality and it irks me.
Yeah, it's pretty gross. I grew up outside D.C. and our public school system had portraits of the President and Vice President prominently displayed on either side of the wall clock at the main entrance to the school. No clue if that's still policy.
Not exactly. Usually there's one board in each building that has the whole chain of command. It looks like this: https://i.imgur.com/9lY058X.jpeg
That's for the military, for civilian organizations it looks similar but with people in business suits.
I need the original video so bad because ~~I have a projector~~ I need to masturbate aggressively.
Something's not quite right about those feet.
Lol, I love it.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.