2

Considering the proliferation of AI-generated slop, as well as the lines between satire and reality being blurred, I wonder if future historians will have a harder time understanding what was really going on.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] algorithmae@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago

In a thousand years, they'd probably lump together 1950 through 2150

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

My oh my. Check out Mr. Optimist over here thinking that they'll be time to be "historians" in between scavenging for scraps and battling the nuclear mutants for the last bottle of fresh water at the bombed out Tesco.

[-] Aphelion@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Well la-dee-dah! Look at Mr. "I think humans will still exist in 1000 years" over here. Let's be real, we're on track to extinct ourselves in the next 200 years if we don't make some very difficult and dramatic changes to our behavior.

[-] ComicalMayhem@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

200 years? lmao, look everyone, this guy thinks our planet will support human life for another 200 years. At best another 80.

[-] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I mean, not to be captain optimist here, but human extinction is a bit far. Humans are extremely adaptable, even if they have to carve out a niche in the worst case hellscape they will survive.

Might not exactly be comfortable.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

You speak the tru tru

[-] sxan@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

The oil runs out in another 30 or 40; things are going to fall apart pretty quickly after that, when we won't be able to get enough food in to maintain cities.

[-] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

If we're stupid to the point of fault. Even market pressure would force diversification of clean energy

[-] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago

I was scanning, and thought you said we'd be battling nuclear mutants for the last bottle of Tabasco.

I don't know which version is more probable.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

A “dark age” is really just one where records didn’t survive, not that it was particularly bad. This usually follows a breakdown of power structures but the real loss is that we can’t know what happened.

I’m worried that transitioning so much to fragile digital technology could result in massive amounts of knowledge and culture being inaccessible, like that guy’s hard drive full of Bitcoin.

And it’s not just all of society that will be lost, but family history as well. Photographs and letters survive a long, long time. But without strict preservation and keeping old formats alive my grandkids won’t be able to flip through old photos of my family like I can with an old photo album.

[-] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Well, with the amount they are attempting to rewrite, if Archive.org goes down, the dark ages shall begin.

[-] missingno@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

We could lose 99.9% of digital records and what's left would still be far more than the amount of surviving records from any other point in history.

[-] missandry351@lemmings.world 2 points 3 months ago

Bold of you to assume humans will still exist

[-] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago
[-] fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

I peeped the horror. It wasn't funny.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah this is exactly what they want. No Voice, Free Exit sounds a lot like no representation and slavery to me.

[-] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Some kind of dark ages - yes.

I suspect it will be considered the Lunatic Age or the Misinformation Age or the Willfully Ignorant Age or something like that, since its most distinctive characteristic, in retrospect, is likely to be the oddity that the creation of the most efficient and comprehensive information-sharing system the world has yet seen led pretty much directly to a worldwide epidemic of ignorance, stupidity, irrationality, and insanity.

[-] illi@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

I've seen "post factual" thrown around the most

[-] anton2492@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 months ago

See also: Post-Truth (Wikipedia). I'm depressed that articles like these even exist...

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 3 months ago

Post modernism way of thinking is inherently subjetivist and in that world every is right if you approach situation from their perspective...

That's where we be now. Really makes it easier for somebody to rule us it seems.

[-] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Makes it easier for someone to convince you that they know what's best for you.

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

35191 readers
358 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS