565
Rolling coal (slrpnk.net)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 101 points 1 week ago

There's diagrams that show the visual impairments such trucks have. They are worse than semi trucks and even an Abrams tank.

https://i.redd.it/kftiwovba73b1.jpg

[-] b000rg@midwest.social 52 points 1 week ago

I don't get how these people even feel comfortable driving something where you can't see the road that's in front of you for 10+ meters out. I just wouldn't feel safe, there could be any kind of obstruction you can't see on the road from 10m away but will still fuck up your day and/or life.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 19 points 1 week ago

If they thought about things and came to good conclusions afterwards, they probably wouldn't be driving this kind of car to begin with. The people who are driving it are probably not good thinkers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

As a truck driver I get it. It's nice to see more. The tradeoff isn't worth it and not why they do it. I would bet my paycheck they never take it off road either. Which would be the only good reason to raise something that much. Truckers have a good reason to. They have giant engine and transmissions that need to last for the industrial work involved.

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 29 points 1 week ago

cabovers are almost exclusively used throughout europe and asia. it's only america and australia that tends to use the big bonnet american style trucks.

there no real reason for it

[-] syreus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

To be fair the regulations on vehicle length and older infrastructure makes the cabover popular.

American style trucks(long nose) get better mileage on longer hauls than the blunt nose design. They also provide more cabin room. As a final note American audiences are conditioned for the long nose design and it's difficult to find the imports here.

Having driven both I think they both have merit. In Europe an American truck would be impossible to maneuver in towns.

So that's the "real reason for it".

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

A lot of trucking is long-range. America is fucking big and not everywhere is served by ports, railroads, and tributaries.

Those roof-scoops and curvaceous hoods aren't just for being sexy. They greatly increase aerodynamics and with it, range.

The important thing is that it requires specialized training and a license to drive something with such poor visibility. The pickups, any 16yo kid can legally drive.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago

There is a reason for it: Regulations that limit the overall vehicle length. The EU has a lower maximum than the U.S., so it favors the cabover design, which allows a longer trailer. The U.S. had lots of cabover trucks on its roads until it increased the allowed length, when truckers took advantage of the easier maintenance and better ergonomics of the bonnet design.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 15 points 1 week ago

They don't look or care. Their car is big enough that they'll plough right through a bunch of kids before they even notice they're on the sidewalk.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

It’s simple uneducated hubris. Nothing bad could ever happen to them because they are a Good American.

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

Looking at those dumbfucks driving their emotional support vehicle in the city, they don't seem to be comfortable

They are driving slow and can't stay in their lane, as they can't judge the distances correctly

[-] RandomCucumber@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

Emotional support vehicle? Don't you mean Gender Affirmation Vehicle?

[-] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

They don’t care, as long as they get to drive their behemoth and feel powerful.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago

Agreed, but some people drive that way. It's their road, get out of the way. I had a 1996 Dodge dually long ago for pulling a trailer, and its visibility wasn't very bad, except for around the damn side columns. I got into the habit of leaning forward and back as I would turn so that I had some idea of what was being blocked. At one point we had considered upgrading to the big trucks like the F-450/F550, and I got into one to see what it was like. I could see EVERYTHING. I was like, holy shit, this is luxury.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

If that's supposed to be understood by Americans, they probably should have put the units in football field-school busses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 53 points 1 week ago

My redneck ranch family has run over so. Many. Of their own dogs

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 26 points 1 week ago
[-] Necroscope0@lemm.ee 42 points 1 week ago

How else are they going to advertise their tiny cocks without public indecency charges?

[-] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Yeah, if they took a picture of them the police would arrest them for CP.

[-] FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee 42 points 1 week ago

Yank tanks are multiplying on this side of the Pacific now too. I’m 6’3” and feel like a little toddler next to one. Just as easy to run over, no doubt.

[-] gurnu@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

I got ran over by a car while on my bike at a roundabout bike & pedestrian crossing: I'm so glad it was a normal sized Opel instead of a tank. Only got a bruise on my butt and even my bike just needed the front wheel realigned. If it was a F-whatever monstrosity I would've been hurt much, much worse.

Personal vehicles in cities should be limited anyways and public transportation/pedestrian & biking paths encouraged. I hate the dust rising from stud tires grinding asphalt.

[-] The_Caretaker@urbanists.social 14 points 1 week ago

@gurnu @FrostyCaveman
I think the majority of streets don't need to be thoroughfares for cars. We could block and barricade most streets so that bicycles and pedestrians can pass through but cars can only get in and out by a single route. Anyone who isn't visiting a home or business in that neighborhood just wouldn't turn off of the main road. Rat running, the use of parallel side streets to avoid traffic and police speed enforcement also causes a lot of problems. #FuckCars #Urbanism

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago

Should require a CDL to drive something that big. It's a bus sized front end.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

And transit busses have a flat front end and a large wind shield.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago

most of the buses in the next town over from me are f-350 and e-350s, so quite literally yes

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] hedge_lord@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago

I agree but I think that car hoods should be higher. If you're hit by one of these you'll die slowly of organ pulverization. It'd be better to be hit in the head and die quickly of head pulverization. It's just that the poor truck cannot reach that high so it needs to be BIGGER. Maybe stick some spikes on there too, and have an optional extended package for saw blades!

(/s in case it wasn't apparent)

[-] The_Caretaker@urbanists.social 18 points 1 week ago

@hedge_lord @Track_Shovel
Electric cars are even more fucked. The reason cars have the front sitting so far forward of the driver is so a combustion engine can get cooled by a radiator. Electric cars don't need that. The driver should be at the front where they can see everything and the rest of the car should be behind them. Combustion engines shouldn't be in cars. They should be allowed in emergency generators and emergency vehicles only. #FuckCars

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 32 points 1 week ago

How else are the owners supposed to compensate for their 2cm dicks?

[-] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Use their fingers?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 week ago

The headlights are at exactly the height to blind everyone who isn't also in a truck as well. I'm convinced that auto manufacturers do this on purpose to force everyone into a size arms race.

[-] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Big vehicles lile trucks in America have lower emissions requirements, which makes them cheaper to make and they can sell them for a higher profit to these insecure dumb fucks, so it's in their interest to make and sell large trucks

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 16 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I can't reconcile the exterior with interior pictures. From the outside it looks like the inside of that truck should be the size of a large sitting room with a Chesterfield and some end tables.

[-] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Gotta cram the plastic shit and uselss tech in there somewhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] remon@ani.social 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Who ever wrote that meme text has definitively been huffing too much exhaust.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheAthena@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I just want my slightly smaller than a Tacoma sized truck with a small diesel that gets like 28 mpg. Is that really too much to ask?

[-] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

I want one of those old 90s Toyota trucks so bad, I wish they still made them. Like that little black truck in back to the future.

[-] _synack@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

That truck was from 1985, but I know what you mean. That truck was awesome!

At least the Ford Maverick is something that exists. I know it’s based on an Escape platform, but that’s fine for most uses of trucks that size.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Add in the amount of times I've seen people drive cars where their seat height puts their eyes at about 2 inches over the steering wheel.

[-] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

I've known a few truck drivers like that, with the air seat almost as low as it can go. The only thing they'd even be capable of seeing is an air strike.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Disgusting cars, honestly.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Pretty sure it is, here.

Btw, what model is it?

[-] numlok@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago
[-] kautau@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Aww man they need to get their numbers up in the competition of which trucks are involved in the most DUIs

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
565 points (98.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

11077 readers
314 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS