31

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/27168720

The company says the new site is expected to create 28,000 jobs and generate £50bn for the economy.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zip2@feddit.uk 6 points 6 days ago

This is replacing Bedford, right?

[-] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 5 points 6 days ago

Yes, it's being bulldozed to make way for it.

[-] Zip2@feddit.uk 4 points 6 days ago

About time!

[-] dicksteele@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago
[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 4 points 6 days ago

Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the government had agreed with Universal that British steel would be used "where possible" on the project.

"That's the case with HS2, with Heathrow, and with this private investment here in Bedfordshire," she said.

And yet they won't endorse Buy British.

[-] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

"How much British steel was used in the end?"
"Approximately or absolutely?”
“Approximately.”
“Approximately none."
“And absolutely?”
“Also none.”
"But didn't you agree to use British steel where possible."
"Oh, yes indeed. And we did. Where possible. As agreed."
"But why didn't you use more?"
"It wasn't possible, I'd like to be clear on that point."
"Why wasn't it possible?"
"Chinese steel was cheaper."

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

British Steel got itself into a mess. It decided not to invest in the equipment needed to make high-quality steel, so we get that from the Dutch. That leaves mid-grade steel but the Chinese happily crank that out by the shipload at a lower price.

So you buy British if you don’t need quality, and you aren’t buying in quantity. And they wonder why they’re going under.

[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

And yet they won’t endorse Buy British.

The issue with buy British is, it equates to an anti all foreign trade message. Where we actually need a stronger trade link with nations other then the US.

"Don't buy US" is more effective

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago

Hasn't this been on the books for like 10 years now? I remember hearing about this when I was in high school

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 5 days ago

You’re thinking of the failed scheme to build a Paramount theme park near Dartford.

[-] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 1 points 6 days ago

Only since the end of 2023.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago

I definitely heard about it before then. There was a whole argument with the local council as to a train station, can't remember the details.

[-] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 2 points 5 days ago

Wixams station has been on the cards since that was developed, and it's only recently got the go ahead. That argument has been raging for a long time.

Universal is rather newer.

[-] fusiono@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago

Fun! There should definitely be more leisure and places for kids in the UK.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago

Nah, sod the kids. I never get to go on the swings anymore.

[-] fusiono@feddit.uk 2 points 5 days ago

Haha well it's shit for adults too. Can't find a proper Spa from miles where I live, it's like people would rather get on a plane to tenerife than build something nice to relax here.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Good. A massive investment, and not requiring a load of public subsidy like seemingly everything else.

Nice to see stuff slowly start actually being built.

[-] omcgo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Things like this get built off the back of public investment and subsidy.

HS1, HS2, and the Oxford - > Cambridge line all massively contribute to the reason this is getting built. Not to mention all the Public roads in Bedfordshire.

We must first invest public-ally then the private money follows. Crossrail cost £18.8 billion but the wider economic benefits it brings to London and the UK, are estimated at £42 billion.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Well yeah, but if you go by that, literally everything is from public investment and subsidy.

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Just a minor correction here, HS1 was not built with public funds. Indeed Thatcher wrote into the Channel Tunnel Act 1987 a clause making it illegal for any public subsidy to reach the tunnel or its connecting line. As a consequence, St Pancras is the only privately owned railway station on the national network, and HS1 itself is owned by a private consortium.

[-] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago

Imagine being a britoid starving and freezing and then kid starver comes out and anounces an aquapark

[-] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago

Do you think the government is paying for the park...?

[-] Eiren@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 5 days ago

It takes government time and money to review, approve, ensure the safety of any construction, which they could be using to come up with a solution for life expectancy decreasing, ever-longer NHS waiting lists and medication shortages, etc.

They absolutely should be prioritising general welfare over this. The reason they're not is because the park will put more money in their own pockets, which is, as records will attest, the only thing Kid Starver's Labour care about.

Never mind Bedfordshire, where local government seem to do little else these days aside from cutting down trees and tearing up public benches.

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago

Employing thousands across the park, hospitality, transport, supply chain. Improving the balance of payments as every foreign visitor counts as an export. Showcasing British IP. Yeah it’s a disgrace.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 6 days ago

Yeah because who wants a new employer opening up?

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
31 points (97.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4672 readers
270 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS