68

tl;drThey're planning to under declare the value of goods. If a company doesn't want that, the sellers will handle the shipment on both ends, bringing it through customs at a lower value and then deliver it.

How do other countries deal with this?

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How do other countries deal with this?

Mostly by ignoring it. People don't do it for high value stuff because you can't insure an item without declaring its value correctly. Everything that travels with incorrectly declared value will be insured only for the incorrectly declared value.

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This would be funny if it makes Amerikkkan customs paranoid, so they check every single package & shipment and it grinds the supply chain to a halt

[-] Terrarium@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

That happened on a smaller scale when they tried to abruptly end de minimis around 2 months ago. Previously they would at most randomly check a few of these small packages, suddenly they had to check all of them. USPS customs ground to a halt and items were delayed for up to 2 weeks or so even though they paused the de minimis repeal very quickly.

They're allegedly going to try it again. Their supposed solution is to bypass USPS and have private companies add very large customs fees on top of tariffs. If implemented it would kill the small direct orders market but not after a bunch of pain for buyers that didn't realize their $50 temu order would get a $75 tariff and a $50 fee tacked on after they ordered.

If this is all implementd it will mean much less trade and more expensive imports for basically no reason or benefit. Just a bunch of new pointless and privatized customs workers.

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

They're allegedly going to try it again. Their supposed solution is to bypass USPS and have private companies add very large customs fees on top of tariffs.

amerikkka-clap I'm sure this will work out very well

[-] Terrarium@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

lmao right?

[-] dead@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

Capitalists love to say that value of commodities is subjective until it comes to taxing China.

[-] lorty@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 1 year ago

Brazilians: first time?

[-] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

How do other countries deal with this?

Whenever I've ordered shit for personal use internationally (mostly China and Japan, but I've also ordered from Russia ages ago), the seller usually asks me what value I want listed on the customs invoice. Granted, I'm not buying stuff in bulk for resale or whatever. Seems like a pretty common practice - the risk of under-valuing comes into play if a shipment gets lost/damaged while in transit

[-] Terrarium@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

It's very common for avoiding de minimis and/or having a lower tariff fee. Some countries have de minimis of around $50 so the seller will list the vakue as $30 for a $150 item, foe example.

[-] LaughingLion@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

remember kids, defrauding the government is only based if you get away with it

the second you get busted it is not longer based and you suck for not being clever enough to get away with it

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

CBP isn't doing shit now, does anyone think they're going to start checking everything that comes through on AliExpress?

[-] Terrarium@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

Their supposed plan is to have private companies do it and charge large fees. This would just crush all Aliexpress (as is) demand, though. To keep functioning they would switch to stateside warehousing models or some loophole. They already use their own repackaging service to make there be fewer packages and their own delivery services to bypass USPS, UPS, etc.

this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
68 points (100.0% liked)

news

24774 readers
589 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS