To be clear, they aren't upset at the casting, they're upset that Rowling is involved at all.
I think I'm more annoyed that they're re-doing the franchise at all. Why bother? It's been done! Move on! Try something that hasn't been done already.
To be clear, they aren't upset at the casting, they're upset that Rowling is involved at all.
I think I'm more annoyed that they're re-doing the franchise at all. Why bother? It's been done! Move on! Try something that hasn't been done already.
Yes, it seems strange to re-make the franchise at this time. All 7 novels were adapted into a highly successful film series, so it's not as though it is like The Chronicles of Narnia where no adaptation has ever completed the series.
Exactly, or works that have never even been attempted and there are a BUNCH of those.
Need a replacement for Game of Thrones? How about Elric of Melniboné?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elric_of_Melnibon%C3%A9
Thieve's World?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thieves%27_World
Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fafhrd_and_the_Gray_Mouser
~~Want something with a youth hook like Harry Potter? The Belgariad and Malloreon by David and Leigh Eddings:~~
~~https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Belgariad~~
~~https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Malloreon~~
Replacing one problematic author with one with different problems isn't a solution.
How about Roger Zelazny and the Chronicles of Amber? Still safe?
If Rowling is too toxic, probably best to avoid the Eddings too. Feist's Riftwar instead perhaps
Didn't they keep a kid locked in a cage in their basement?
I didn't know that before enjoying most of their stuff, as a kid, but damn.
Never heard about that, and years before he was published...
YES RIFTWAR
How about Elric of Melniboné?
I would burn entire continents to ash for a good Elric series. Hell, any of the Eternal Champions would be sick.
How about Elric of Melniboné?
How many more Targaryens and Geralts must we endure before this is adapted?
I really think a lot of piers anthony would be perfect for anime adaptions.
Ooh, yeah, I could see that. Get Studio Ghibli on it...
Culture has fossilised. Nothing new is being made, just rehashes of the same "safe" shite because bigwigs know the stuff that already exists will make them that sweet, sweet money.
The only way to free ourselves is to stop consuming the overdone cash cow slop. If we don't vote with our wallets and make it not profitable for them, it will never stop. They'll keep regurgitating the same "remakes and reboots" until society collapses. Resist FOMO. Stop consuming.
Also fuck Rowling.
People don't spend money to go see "new" shit, but do spend money to see rehashed "safe" shit, so why would studios bother trying to make anything else.
Like it or not, money talks. And the public has overwhelmingly said this is what they prefer.
Money talks if profit is the only goal, and all money talks is bullshit.
And the public has overwhelmingly said this is what they prefer.
It's the other way around.
Studios used to take chances on new IP's back in the day when they didn't have to make a billion dollars at the box office just to "break even" (I'm being a tad hyperbolic about that number). There's a clip of Matt Damon on 'Hot Ones' breaking this down. For those who can't (or don't want to) click the link, it basically goes like this:
In the days before the streaming boom, a movie studio could afford to spend a bunch of money producing and marketing an original movie, knowing that what they sank into production and advertising would most likely be recouped in video rentals, in the event that the movie under-performed at the box office. Once physical movie rentals went away, so did all that back end money, and studios became a lot more hesitant to take those kinds of risks. The end result was that studios started buying existing IP's that were already popular and producing those almost exclusively. The final death throes of video rental stores happened in the mid-to-late 2000s (think MCU Phase 1 era), and that's where we saw the big increase in reboots, sequels, prequels, franchises, and cinematic universes.
So basically, the majority of big studios lost a ton of revenue from the defunct video rental business, so they did a bunch of market research to find out what people liked (or rather, what made the most money), then decided that was pretty much all they were going to make from then on. The public ate it up for the same reason they eat junk food or smoke meth; it has no substance, but it has all the right ingredients to trigger a dopamine response.
The fault here lies with the dealer, not the junkie.
I'll add that the cost to see anything is so freakn high right now that no one wants to chance losing so much money on something new that turns out to be a dud. So safe it is!
I really liked Tenet
They're re-doing it because Rowling wants a new production with actors who aren't vocally outspoken in support of LGBTQ+, she came out and said it explicitly. This further doubles down that anyone involved in this production is an absolute pelican of a human being and should be shamed.
Nick Frost isn't in support of LGBTQ+? That's kind of shocking...
No, not that he's not in support of LGBTQ, but that he hasn't been outspoken in his distaste for Rowling's support of anti-LGBTQ policy and rhetoric, like the 3 main actors in the HP movies were.
Ya but.... Money
honestly, at this point, I feel like they'll just ruin whatever I liked and they touch.
I'm still salty at what "they" did to Tom Bombadill. did him dirty, they did.
You think of this post as politics rather than, say, celebrity drama or movie studio drama?
The complaints are especially political given the current administration.
she essentially the british version of musk, on all the anti-trans thing.
I hope nobody will watch this and they’ll loose a bunch of money. Beating the dead horse is an awful trend in television.
Lay with dogs, get fleas.
Fuck Nick Frost and anyone involved with that piece of shit JK Rowling.
They drove a dump truck full of money to his house. What was he supposed to do?
He could donate his salary to pro-trans groups and causes. That would be a huge middle finger to JK.
I've already seen Harry Potter Balenciaga and frankly AI art is an improvement to the franchise
Nick frost is a fine casting but Snape? He’s gonna be Kanye East.
Alan Rickman was the absolute perfect casting for Snape. Nobody else could have brought him to life so well and so true to the books.
Of the entire film cast I think everyone could have been replaced except for Snape, therefore it does make sense to be bold and try something different in his casting for the new show.
Maybe but putting a black man in the wizard KKK rubs me wrong. It’d make more sense to make Harry himself black, heck Harry himself has a Black godfather. If we’re doing away with the whole wizard KKK vibe too, making Sirius and Bellatrix black would be funny.
Clayton Bigsby walked so Severus Snape could run.
Alan Rickman was way to old though. He was supposed to be young. He isn't "young" but I think Paul Dano could have played a decent fit. (Parents should have been what 19? And snape around 30 when the movies/books started ?)
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News