Honestly, that's space in general. As time goes on, it becomes increasingly obvious that space is not only dead, but hostile too. Humans can't even live in low gravity for extended periods of time. The ships required to use centrifugal force would be massive and require insane amounts of resources that I don't even think a socialist country could achieve without unified effort or other nations.
We look at a lot of exoplanets and we find that terrestrial planets in the Goldilocks Zone are quite rare in comparison to mercury like planets, gas giants and debris clusters. Take a look at the theorized habitable exoplanets and a good chunk of them have massive possible flaws.
I do not believe you can give birth in space either.
Then your partner needs the above; unless you're moving there for her. There is still plenty of risk in that, especially in marriage.
Most people's skills would be useless unless they're in some bullshit managerial/executive position, defense contract, IT skills, medical or basically a slave contract to go to Dubai.
There aren't a lot of countries where your trade, shop or desk skills would be in high demands that wouldn't put you in slight risk of being the victim of America's foreign policy in bombs or it's global economic stranglehold.
Of course, you can always know someone.
What fucking causes and rights? Did we watch the same debate? She tried to out-hitler Trump on border control, immigration and prisons. The only right I heard her mention was to "protect the elderly from scams" which was thrown in there during a stutter.
Other than that, it's 20k to first time homebuyers (fuck the renters) and she won't even budge on the rights of Palestinians to not get bombed. What fucking rights? She didn't even have a big bill or plan other than "vote for me" and "I got Dick Cheney, drumpf"
My usual response is "I don't want to be a victim of it's foreign policy"
Dirty nuclear attacks pretty much have one purpose; area of denial. If they use them, that'd pretty much be the only purpose. Contaminating a section of land and giving horrible diseases to whoever goes there for 300-10,000 years. At this stage of the war, I don't think they'd use them at this point or at spent fuel sites but perhaps if they're forced into retreat?
Sure, this is RT. An example of looking at this article though is that Russian intelligence or another source from Russian government is concerned about the potential use of dirty bombs. Their info could be wrong or not. That's pretty much what I get from this; not that they're going to be used now, where they say it's gonna be used or etc.
Regardless of that, we have first-hand evidence here that liberals (of the feddit variety, at least) would be glad to see a land poisoned for thousands of years and thousands more slaughtered to enforce and justify a literal neo-nazi terrorist state that is already eager to commit resources to violence in Africa for their American paymasters during an existential war.
They can't get enough blood, folks, they love it.
"Just leave your settlement and come outside with us, man. We'll give you total immunity."
scrolls down a few posts
skinhead chanting at police mid-crowd pogrom
Bonus Reddit comment: "NOOO!! This isn't corruption or affecting your taxes!! We just overestimated by a couple billion/accidentally cooked the books and determined we can send more!"
Man, it just must be so fuckin easy to be a newspaper analyst. "There's just TOO MANY solar panels and I DON'T KNOW HOW THEY CAN MAKE THAT MANY obviously their POWER GRID must be FAILING LIKE TEXAS."
On that proletarian gas