129
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by 666@lemmygrad.ml to c/news@hexbear.net

"The Pentagon announced on June 21, 2023 that it had overestimated the value of arms sent to Ukraine over the past two years by $6.2 billion. Now, the discovery of additional errors brings the total unspent sum to $8.2 billion."

--

"U.S. Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA) allows the president to allocate equipment from U.S. stocks, such as ammunition, vehicles, and medical supplies, to respond to crises abroad. PDA arises from the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.

The Pentagon's "efforts to properly value defense articles for drawdown are hampered because the Foreign Assistance Act does not clearly define certain terms and DOD lacks PDA-specific valuation guidance," according to the GAO.

Due to the errors, the Defense Department can send a further $2 billion in weapons to Ukraine to cover the amount already approved by U.S. President Joe Biden."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 666@lemmygrad.ml 52 points 1 month ago

Bonus Reddit comment: "NOOO!! This isn't corruption or affecting your taxes!! We just overestimated by a couple billion/accidentally cooked the books and determined we can send more!"

[-] star_wraith@hexbear.net 50 points 1 month ago

8.9k upvotes. If there was ever a comment that convinced me Reddit is astroturfed / an op, this is it. Because they are objectively wrong. Or at least intentionally misleading.

They’re focusing on the fact that the valuation equipment changed and ignoring what that actually means. Sure, by itself it doesn’t affect US taxpayers. But the point is, the military says they overvalued it by $2, so that allows them to send $2 billion more worth of equipment. That’s additional stocks of weapons that ostensibly have to be replaced, which is paid for by tax dollars.

And while it’s not provably corrupt, it strains credulity to think this was not done in order to ship more weapons. Revaluations of this kind are much much more likely because someone wants it revalued, i.e. corruption.

[-] 666@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 month ago

No, no, it's the US government. We don't use terms like corruption here...fulfilling lobby quotas is a better term..

[-] mustGo@hexbear.net 42 points 1 month ago
[-] brainw0rms@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"It's just my birth year bro! why won't you believe me bro? I swear bro. not everyone who has 1488 in their name and is advocating for nazis is a nazi bro, what are you schizo bro???" every fucking time fuckin-deserve

[-] Pili@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago

It's actually my birth year and I hate that Nazis have claimed it for themselves.

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

They ruined so much stuff with their fetid touch. Runes look cool, the swastika is cool, having a skull emblem is cool. Fuckin fascist nerds.

[-] Anvil_Lavigne@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

had a rune shirt once. first time out wearing it, this guy i had titled Toy Nazi immediately compliments it upon walking in. threw the fucking thing out after. the shirt, not the guy. tho, yeah, in retrospect, i'm not a v clever gal.

[-] hypercracker@hexbear.net 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

libs will write this then turn around and write an even longer post about how the war "costs us nothing" because the US is sending old stock that was slated to be destroyed anyway, or because all the weapon manufacturing money stays in the US, or whatever the cope of the day is

[-] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think all the people working at the weapons factories could be put into better use like building high speed rail.

The liberals argue the MIC is a good way to stimulate the economy when in reality American military spending mostly ends up in financial markets not being used for anything productive. A small bit of it maybe ends up in the hands of people working in the factories (who then spend it on goods and services etc) but that is nothing.

This is a good article on military spending

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago

This doesn't affect your taxes (except for $2bn more being spent on fuelling pointless war instead of healthcare).

[-] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago

"we" this "we" that...

There is no "we" you stupid servile cuck, the american elite do whatever they want whether you like it or not. No room for your input.

US government makes a huge "mistake" costing literally $2 billion extra dollars of their funding, which comes from taxpayer money.

Reddit: wojak-nooo "NOOOOO THIS ISNT A MISTAKE, THIS DOESNT AFFECT YOUR TAX DOLLARS!"

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago

How can someone say that the Pentagon is doing "back of the envelope math" for billions of dollars of military ordinance and not get called out for bird-screm-2 COMPLETE GIBBERING INSANITY

[-] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

These idiots don't remember Rumsfeld reiterating on Sept 10, 2001 (yes) that the military had approximately 2 TRILLION in 'accounting irregularities'

This isn't new, and covering for the MIC in such a manner is naive at best

[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago

In order to correctly finish the analogy here, the place you donate to would have to call back and demand another $2,000 car from you to cover the discrepancy, and you'd have to comply.

[-] LocalOaf@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

"I'm not owned!!! I'm not owned!!!" 🌽 dril

[-] Kieselguhr@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago

Don't worry it will go "poof" once in Ukraine, both literally and figuratively

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
129 points (100.0% liked)

news

23409 readers
590 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS