[-] DroneRights@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

Misogynists have historically held more institutional power than women. We had a time when women knew how to speak inclusively and misogynists didn't, it was called the 1960s. It sucked.

[-] DroneRights@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago

Correcting a misogynist is more likely to provoke a visible reaction than ignoring problematic speech. If it isn't corrected, it becomes normal.

48
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by DroneRights@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
22
[-] DroneRights@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

About a week ago on Hexbear someone was saying China was good, and I said it's not good if you're queer. They replied that America is even worse. To which I said, "I know, I'm trying to get my trans partner out of there so it isn't holocausted. China and America aren't the only two countries. Why do you think America is important to this discussion?"

I think that's what whataboutism should refer to. When someone tries to excuse bad behaviour through comparison to an irrelevant third thing. I see it all the time in Australia from climate apathiers who say "We shouldn't try to reduce our emissions because China won't". I always tell them "we're doing worse per capita than China is. And even if we weren't, wouldn't you want our country to be a global leader in something?"

73
[-] DroneRights@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

Here in Australia, American breakfast cereals are only sold in lolly shops (candy stores)

[-] DroneRights@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

I'd guess it's because of them there big city liberals with their radical ideas like "basic equality". Of course the Nazi party want to re-educate their kids

[-] DroneRights@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

Yeah fr young people be like "I'm so angsty because I love my friends and desire a deep personal connection with them" that's what friends are for you fools!

[-] DroneRights@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

What part of "you've found someone you feel like you can really connect with" excludes being friends or queerplatonic partners with that person? Ideally all your friendships should have a deep feeling of personal connection and love.

[-] DroneRights@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A few weeks ago I met a system and was thinking about the possibility of a relationship with them, but they said they were taken so I was friendzoned. A few days ago they said they were willing to try polyamory again and want to date me and join my swarm, but one of their members has some creepy incel behaviours and I want to deprogram the alt right shit in his head before I get too close to him, so I friendzoned them.

Being friendzoned didn't suck and friendzoning them didn't suck. We're simply not in a place where a relationship would be healthy right now, even though we've quickly become close friends. It doesn't suck because I know how to communicate and set clear boundaries from both sides.

I think this "wah I'm in the friendzone" shit comes from straight men who never learned how to be honest with their feelings and others. Honestly, that kind of behaviour is why I'm not dating my friend. If these men spent more time learning about feelings, maybe they wouldn't be friendzoned in the first place.

EDIT: oh and obviously being monoamorous is a big source of angst for straight people, but that's their own fault too.

[-] DroneRights@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

Politics is when minorities demand rights, and the less rights they already have, the more political it is. And if it's a minority I haven't heard of, that's trolling.

[-] DroneRights@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know an autistic dog. He spends all day staring at the ceiling because he likes the way lights look. He hates being pet, but he loves hiding under a table where someone is sitting. He doesn't understand social norms

33

And the less rights the minority currently has, the more political it is.

And when it's a minority I haven't heard of before, that's trolling.

[-] DroneRights@hexbear.net 44 points 1 year ago

We stole a balloon!

-13

When it comes to subreddits, lemmy communities, and lemmy instances, the people enforcing the rules are the same people making the rules. To borrow from legal terminology, the legislative, executive, and judicial branches are the same. Mods and admins are judge, jury, and executioner. This gives them a lot of power and allows biases in the way they enforce the rules to go ignored.

When it comes to the reddit admins, however, and sitewide bans and content removal, the people enforcing the rules are employees. They report to a boss, and have to follow guidelines already established. The content policy has already been written, and changing it is a big deal. If a ban is unjust, it can be appealed using the rules. When biases in the ways the rules are enforced happen, it's easier to undo them. And I'm not saying it's easy, but on Lemmy, it's impossible. You can't even log into your account if you're banned, how are you supposed to appeal?

Reddit as a business has a great deal more power than any fediverse instance's mod teams. But ironically, the low ranking admins have less power to make bad decisions. And that's why I've noticed a consistent pattern that Reddit is better at moderating cases that are legally clear-cut, but emotionally controversial. On Lemmy, admins follow their feelings. On Reddit, people may have a lot of feelings, but the proletariat administration intern has had feelings beaten out of them, and they more often end up following the rules.

The way Reddit operates is soulless and horrible and capitalist, but... soul is where hatred comes from. You're less likely to find that in the workings of an unfeeling machine.

view more: next ›

DroneRights

joined 1 year ago