Insurance companies shouldn't exist. Healthcare should not be a for-profit institution.

Probably a good thing you got banned for advocating for child abuse.

Answer me this: are they or are they not consistently in support of Russia/China? Because I've seen it a lot from them (and blocked the instance soon after joining Lemmy when I noticed the pattern).

Is it just some big joke that went over my head?

Yeah, this person posts a lot and is weirdly consistent in how much they fuck up post titles.

A language is not functional just because it supports higher order functions. Technically C even supports them (even though the ergonomics and safety of them are terrible). Would you call C a functional programming language? Obviously not. Rust is also not a functional language, even though it comes closer than most OO/imperative languages.

Kotlin and plenty of other OO languages have borrowed some ideas from functional languages in recent years because those ideas are useful. That doesn't make them functional languages. If Kotlin were a functional language, then it wouldn't need libraries like arrow to try to make doing FP in Kotlin even (kind of) possible.

Hallmarks of FP (beyond higher-order functions), in no particular order:

• Organization around functions as the fundamental unit of code
• Code primarily defined in terms of expressions and data transformations rather than statements manipulating object state (so languages that have big blocks of imperative statements like Kotlin don't count)
• A general orientation around pure functions, even if they vary on the degree to which they enforce purity
• Explicit parameter passing being the standard and preferred way of providing data to functions, rather than methods operating on implicit state
• First class support for function composition (method chaining doesn't count)
• Pattern matching and destructuring as a first-class and ubiquitous concept (what Kotlin does have is a joke comparatively and no one would actually call it that)
• For statically-typed functional languages, first class support for algebraic data types (Kotlin has sealed classes which can kind of be used to try to emulate it, but it's pretty awkward in comparison and requires you to write very OO-ish code to use)

There are some minor exceptions, such as Clojure lacking pattern matching, but on the whole functional languages generally fit these descriptions.

Any examples of the claim that he's embraced FP more?

Last I saw, he was making wild, baseless assertions about FP concepts like monoids and monads on Twitter.

Same story for Nebraska. Most of the population lives in Omaha or Lincoln which both lean blue, but Republicans gerrymandered the fuck out of our districts so we're a red state. And it matters a lot more here since we're one of two states that split our electoral college votes by congressional district. Like recently Lincoln overwhelmingly voted for a Democrat for our district in a special election, but Republicans naturally redrew the fucking maps to include counties that are fucking north of Omaha (like 120 miles away). Look at this shit: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Nebraska's+1st+Congressional+District,+NE/@41.2698636,-96.4887192,8z/data=!4m6!3m5!1s0x87915d2ef259455b:0x74cb97568fa3047a!8m2!3d41.5312936!4d-97.2652858!16zL20vMDl0eHky?gl=us

What's the difference between "vitlök" and "vit lök"?

It's too good to pass this up in this thread: threw*.

Speak for yourself. I don't use LLMs and never will.

It always irks me when people talk about it like it's universal and inevitable when that's very far from the case. There are many, many issues with them and many developers wisely choose to ignore the fad.

The issues are primarily with Azure, I believe.

Nope, just dumped INT.