59
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The constitution doesn’t say only the Supreme Court can decide something is illegal. The supremacy clause does give the SC the power to decide if a law violates the constitution, and if so, the constitution takes precedence after review.

The law, while it is enacted, defines what is legal as a tautology. If judicial review overturns a law, then such actions are obviously not illegal anymore because the law would not be in effect. But you aren’t going to avoid prison by arguing that the statutory basis of your charges has never been reviewed and is therefore in a quantum superposition of legality.

Which brings me to my earlier point: the constitution empowers the Supreme Court to judicial review for settling matters of constitutionality. Nowhere does it say that only the Supreme Court can make legal determinations. That’s more or less how Roe was overturned recently: the SC argued that an abortion ban is not unconstitutional, therefore the SC cannot nullify abortion ban laws. This means that lower courts can determine abortion to be illegal, according to their local laws.

The modern idea of the Supreme Court’s authority, which I referred to as a meme, comes more from Marbury v Madison than from the constitution.

[-] Xanza@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

The constitution doesn’t say only the Supreme Court can decide something is illegal.

Article III, Section 1:

  • "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish."

Yet another armchair expert that's literally never taken the time to read the Constitution, which again, establishes the US Supreme Court as the highest court in the land vesting in it, supreme judicial power. So why don't you do yourself a favor and Google what "judicial power" means...

Congress has the power to make anything into law that they want, regardless of the legality of it. It comes down to the SCOTUS to interpret whether or not the law is indeed legal and enforceable. That is a power vested singularly in the SCOTUS by the US Constitution.

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
59 points (98.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13684 readers
845 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS