75

Norwegian fuel company Haltbakk Bunkers has announced it will cease supplying fuel to U.S. military forces in Norway and American ships docking in Norwegian ports, citing dissatisfaction with recent U.S. policy towards Ukraine.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] loaf@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

This will continue (the whole of America suffering) until someone wrangles in Trump...

... or he gets us into a major war we can't win.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Rich people have to start losing significant amounts of money before anything is done about Trump.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

This will continue (the whole of America suffering) until someone wrangles in Trump…

When Republican Senators profits or jobs become at risk, because of what Trump's doing, then you'll see some wrangling done.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[-] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Genuine question: why is this comment licensed under creative commons?

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

He's the equivalent of one of those Facebook people that thinks "if you put this at the end of your posts they can't steal your comments". It's nonsense and doesn't change anything. Just ignore it and keep scrolling.

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I miss the old web, where if someone wanted to RP as a alien or a cat or something in all their forum posts, we just kind of rolled with it. The internet was strange and diverse.

So many people are dog piling this guy because, in essence, he isn't conforming. He's including a little forum signature on his lemmy posts in 2025.

Just ignore it and keep scrolling.

I agree, but not in a "this guy is an idiot" kind of way, but in a "do whatever you want and keep the internet diverse and strange" kind of way. Let the guy have his small protest. Folks need to stop dog piling him. It shows up in many of the threads he's in, and judgments about his little signature dominate over anything he actually had to say.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 month ago

In complete accord with this comment. We've stared into the abyss so long, we've become the abyss.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

It shows up in many of the threads he’s in, and judgments about his little signature dominate over anything he actually had to say.

Yep, yep. Like right here for example. And this was going on 9-10 months ago too, its a bi-daily thing.

A single line of text that is a link to a Creative Commons license really shouldn't be pissing off so many people.

I mean, do people also get pissed off when they scroll down the bottom of each and every Wikipedia page, and see the CC license there? Or read an news article that has a license footer at the end of the article?

To be tinfoil hatty about it for a moment, I really do believe at this point that I'm being attacked repeatidly (every 48ish hours) by a bot brigade used by someone(s) who really doesn't want others to start doing what I'm doing, licensing their content, by harassing me off of Lemmy.

My licensing is not just to tell for-profit entities that they can't use my content for free, its to tell non-profit open-source projects that they can use my content for free.

I agree, but not in a “this guy is an idiot” kind of way,

Yeouch. I thank you for the support, but damn that hurts too.

For the record, I truly believe that the Safe Harbor laws, and that Laws trump ToS, means that I truly own the content that is being posted here (and so do you and everybody else who posts/comments, for that matter). Even if its not being inforced today, the laws are on the books, and this will come to a head a some point.

I mean, look at whats going on right now with Mozilla/Firefox and their ToS changes. Corporations sure are not shy to use licensing of their content to the best of their abilities.

Why should only corporations avail themselves and be protected by the law? Why is everybody else so quick to surrender the little protections under the law that they have, and to ridicule others who try to use the law to their benefit?

Take a moment, and really think that one though. Its like there's a Corporate version of Order 66 going on or something. 😜

By the way echolalia@lemmy.ml, while I started to reply to you directly, the above is really a response to everyone who would be intellectually honest in judging my actions and take a moment to think it though before replying to me.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[-] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

When you wear a tinfoil hat out in public, the people snickering aren't trying to tap into your brainwaves. Well, I mean shit, maybe they are. Depends on the drip.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Wow, never heard this one before too. I wish whomever is directing the bot brigade could maybe update their negative comments algo to freshen them up a bit with new insults.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

"everyone who calls out my behavior is a bot" 🤣

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

At least this weirdo isn’t a transphobic bigot like that dragon asshole.

[-] Kitathalla@lemy.lol -1 points 1 month ago

That's quite the axe you've got there, mr. ayyy. You been grinding it on any dragons lately? Just, bringing it up on random comments about internet behavior?

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

It's that boomer Facebook "I don't consent to use using data" meme in it's newest form.

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
75 points (98.7% liked)

News

28683 readers
3149 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS