243
explain deez nutz (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 72 points 3 days ago

It’s true. Give me a hot and dense enough furnace and I’ll recycle everything into iron. EVERYTHING.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Even denser and I'll make it neutronium.

... But not too dense or it becomes ???.

[-] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago

Hawking radiation.... eventually.

[-] Asetru@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago

I'll have two ingots of that, please.

[-] 3laws@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I'm fine with just a bite. I'll go fetch my habanero sauce.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Wouldn't the hot part actually make it harder...? All you want is density and as little to counter gravity as possible.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Fair enough, though I promise at those pressures things get spicy.

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

Its harder but its necessary i guess. For ionisation

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago
[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

I guess to overcome electron degeneracy pressure. Nucleus would collide more easily when electrons are stripped away. Not sure if i am conpletely true though

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Heat means more vibrations, which means less density and more force needed to compress the matter to the same density. Just compare any solid material to plasma. Or the 100 million kelvin plasma at ITER, which has an absurdly low density (like a high vacuum) but still 1 bar of pressure due to the thermal pressure.

Electron degeneracy pressure is always present when there are electrons, regardless if they are part of an atom or free moving in a plasma.

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

Higher heat also means more violent collisions. It would be much harder to collide nucleus by just pressing it. But yeah maybe with even more pressure it might happen but nuclear reactions usually happen with high speed collisions.

When electrons are bound to nucleus, it may prevent collision by having an additional layer causing degeneracy pressure between two colliding nucleus. That won't happen if electrons are unbounded to nucleus. Atleast that's what i imagine

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

The electron pressure is always there.

But you are right regarding the thermal energy making fusions easier, which can happen at any pressure or density with enough velocity. At this point I am not even sure which of the 2 approaches (cold and far denser or hot and far less dense) would be "easier", where we would have to first define what easier would actually be...

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago

I am thinking, that when ionised, electron pressure only holds electrons away but does not prevent nuclear collisions because they are unbounded to electrons. But when not ionised, atoms are being pused together with electron repulsion holding back the nucleus.

I also doubt if the furnace is cold and high pressure, overcoming electron degeneracy pressure causes inverse beta decay and turns the thing into a neutron star? Then you wouldn't get new elements but a pile of neutrons?

In stars, nuclear reactions happen at high temperatures and pressure and at death stage of a massive star(becoming a neutron star), all the electron degeneracy pressure is overcame by gravity and the same inverse beta decay happens and protons and electrons combine to give massive pile of neutrons.

If you think of a bunch of solid atoms(low temp) put in high pressure, why would nucleus react anyway? Nucleus are bound by electrons and are not able to collide with other nucleus in that state. Electrons need to combine into the nucleus with high pressure. For the case of hot plasma, nucleus are able to move through the electrons and react. You don't need to overcome electron degeneracy pressure for that.

(I think i said things that i earlier said i'm not sure about, but this is a bit more thoughtful response while others were sent in a hurry mind)

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Electron repulsion is irrelevant compared to the energies needed for fusion. It only takes a few eV to throw electrons out orbit, since they are so far away from the nucleus. On the other hand, a nucleus itself would be attracted to these electrons equally much approaching them and passing them, resulting in a net 0 effect.

The electrostatic effect of the 2 positive nuclei repelling is WAY larger due to the extremely small distances needed for fusion.

[-] univers3man@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The factory must grow.

[-] tfed@infosec.exchange 1 points 2 days ago

@pennomi @fossilesque by launching trash into sun? :blobthinksmart: :ablobcool: :blobthinkingcool:

[-] tfed@infosec.exchange 1 points 2 days ago

@pennomi @fossilesque Sun's nuclear fusion can make atoms up to iron.

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

we already have one

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
243 points (96.6% liked)

Science Memes

13353 readers
2350 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS