225
explain deez nutz (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 3 points 2 hours ago

They are making plastic out of strange quarks!?

[-] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago

were 99% binding energy anyway

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago

Deep down chemists know all chemistry is physics, and that fact makes their bones tremble.

[-] marius@feddit.org 12 points 11 hours ago

And all physics is just statistics

[-] meyotch@slrpnk.net 7 points 11 hours ago

And all statistics are damned lies.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 10 hours ago

The Universe has left the chat

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 65 points 22 hours ago

It’s true. Give me a hot and dense enough furnace and I’ll recycle everything into iron. EVERYTHING.

[-] tfed@infosec.exchange 1 points 2 hours ago

@pennomi @fossilesque by launching trash into sun? :blobthinksmart: :ablobcool: :blobthinkingcool:

[-] tfed@infosec.exchange 1 points 2 hours ago

@pennomi @fossilesque Sun's nuclear fusion can make atoms up to iron.

[-] univers3man@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

The factory must grow.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 20 points 21 hours ago

Even denser and I'll make it neutronium.

... But not too dense or it becomes ???.

[-] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 15 points 19 hours ago

Hawking radiation.... eventually.

[-] Asetru@feddit.org 7 points 15 hours ago

I'll have two ingots of that, please.

[-] 3laws@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I'm fine with just a bite. I'll go fetch my habanero sauce.

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 14 hours ago

we already have one

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

Wouldn't the hot part actually make it harder...? All you want is density and as little to counter gravity as possible.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago

Fair enough, though I promise at those pressures things get spicy.

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 15 hours ago

Its harder but its necessary i guess. For ionisation

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago
[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago

I guess to overcome electron degeneracy pressure. Nucleus would collide more easily when electrons are stripped away. Not sure if i am conpletely true though

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Heat means more vibrations, which means less density and more force needed to compress the matter to the same density. Just compare any solid material to plasma. Or the 100 million kelvin plasma at ITER, which has an absurdly low density (like a high vacuum) but still 1 bar of pressure due to the thermal pressure.

Electron degeneracy pressure is always present when there are electrons, regardless if they are part of an atom or free moving in a plasma.

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Higher heat also means more violent collisions. It would be much harder to collide nucleus by just pressing it. But yeah maybe with even more pressure it might happen but nuclear reactions usually happen with high speed collisions.

When electrons are bound to nucleus, it may prevent collision by having an additional layer causing degeneracy pressure between two colliding nucleus. That won't happen if electrons are unbounded to nucleus. Atleast that's what i imagine

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

The electron pressure is always there.

But you are right regarding the thermal energy making fusions easier, which can happen at any pressure or density with enough velocity. At this point I am not even sure which of the 2 approaches (cold and far denser or hot and far less dense) would be "easier", where we would have to first define what easier would actually be...

[-] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 6 points 14 hours ago

They're not recyclable yet. In a few years when we have Mr. Fusions and replicators, things will be different.

[-] DozensOfDonner@mander.xyz 7 points 13 hours ago

Lol literally Recycling everything made of particles would be pretty sick

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 14 hours ago

plastic bottles are recyclable

[-] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Not really. Plastic gets damaged when heating it up to melting temps. You won't get a product that has the same properties, unlike with aluminium for instance. You can maybe get away with adding a small percentage of recycled pellets back in, but that's it.

[-] Aux@feddit.uk 1 points 18 minutes ago

Metals are also not 100% recyclable due to contamination. We just have plenty of use for low grade metal alloys.

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

fair enough

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago

PET bottles yes, other plastic bottles not so much, or at least until someone figures out a way to turn plastic trash into a cheap alternative to petroleum.

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
225 points (96.7% liked)

Science Memes

13259 readers
3207 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS