52

Not because there is ethical consumption under capitalism, but because ethical purity is the wrong goal.

Leftists keep getting distracted by moralising. The aim is to lift the working class.

'There is no ethical consumption under capitalism' is a catchcry used to argue against consumer action because it is morally impure. I don't care whether my actions are morally pure; I care about the results they produce.

Leftists are shit at focusing on the results of their action. The end-game of leftists is to feel morally superior: never mind that no good results have been achieved.

Using syllogistic logic:

  • Surface premise: 'There is no ethical consumption under capitalism'

  • Hidden premise: And we should only take actions that are ethically pure

  • Conclusion: therefore we shouldn't reform consumption

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SamotsvetyVIA@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

this is an issue i see with so many "communists". statements that focus on legalistic shit, talking about UN international laws, about human rights, about supporting this bourgeois over that one, about increasing internal consumption blah blah blah. if everything is tinged with you talking to hypothetical libs, and therefore taking on their premise, then people will assume that this is all you have to offer.

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
52 points (96.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13932 readers
700 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS