52

Not because there is ethical consumption under capitalism, but because ethical purity is the wrong goal.

Leftists keep getting distracted by moralising. The aim is to lift the working class.

'There is no ethical consumption under capitalism' is a catchcry used to argue against consumer action because it is morally impure. I don't care whether my actions are morally pure; I care about the results they produce.

Leftists are shit at focusing on the results of their action. The end-game of leftists is to feel morally superior: never mind that no good results have been achieved.

Using syllogistic logic:

  • Surface premise: 'There is no ethical consumption under capitalism'

  • Hidden premise: And we should only take actions that are ethically pure

  • Conclusion: therefore we shouldn't reform consumption

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 24 points 3 weeks ago

I always interpreted as “shifting consumption patterns under capitalism won’t end capitalism.” Not that shifting consumption patterns is in and of itself, a bad thing, but that it has to be understood that it has its limits in what it can accomplish.

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
52 points (96.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13932 readers
740 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS