122
Hulk Hogan dead at 71 (consequence.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If they had simply obeyed the court order to take down the non-consensual sex tape they would still exist

If they hadn't made an enemy of Thiel by outing his sexuality against his consent they would still exist

Say what you will about how bad a guy Hogan and Thiel are/were and say what you will about how positive Gawker was about counter-narrative against chud culture. But they were very stupid and the only one to blame is them.

[-] frogbellyratbone_@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If they had simply obeyed the court order to take down the non-consensual sex tape they would still exist

Gawker appealed the take down order and won.

If they hadn't made an enemy of Thiel by outing his sexuality against his consent they would still exist

oh so we have to play nice with literal demons in order to exist?

I'm being condescending and I apologize I just really really do not like this argument you're making

even just ignoring how much of a techno-fascist Thiel is, one doesn't get to fund/support homophobic politicians/causes while being closeted. one doesn't get the safety of privacy while hurting people. sorry not sorry.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

Gawker appealed the take down order and won.

you must know more details about it than I do, but the end of the story remains that they were forced to pay a fine that shuttered the company so it kinda sounds like you're doing a 'Hillary got more votes' here

oh so we have to play nice with literal demons in order to exist?

No, just don't be an idiot. When you attack someone expect a response.

I'm being condescending and I apologize I just really really do not like this argument you're making

pigpoop

Then don't purposefully misread it in the most uncharitable way possible

[-] frogbellyratbone_@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

so it kinda sounds like you're doing a 'Hillary got more votes' here

pigpoop

no it doesn't. you're only now saying that because you don't know the history re: Gawker's take down but decided to comment on it

No, just don't be an idiot. When you attack someone expect a response.

it's idiotic to attack billionaires... so we have to play nice with them in order to survive?

you just really argued that fucking annoying point twice? and here i thought i was being irrationally condescending.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

I'm left with the inescapable conclusion that you're either acting in good faith and you're very fucking stupid, or you're acting in bad faith and you're very fucking dishonest.

My statement had an if-then. Your characterization of my statement erases this.

You're deliberately erasing my intent EVEN AFTER HAVING ME FUCKING REPEAT MYSELF SO AS TO CLARIFY and inserting something I didn't say completely of your own creation.

GO. FUCK. YOURSELF.

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

i'm cool with outing ghouls. they should've taken down the tape tho

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
122 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13954 readers
527 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS