Einstein won the Nobel a hundred years ago proving that light works in chunks called photons. If a photon needs frequency v to ionize an atom, then you can shine frequency v/2 on it for years if you want — it will never ionize the atom. This is because the energy from the lower frequency light doesn’t “build up” in the atom until the electron is kicked out. The photon must have the correct amount of energy needed to interact with the electron and eject it. Otherwise, nothing happens.

So it might be true that the overall radiation exposure from WiFi in terms of total energy might be equivalent in a few years to solar energy received in a few minutes, but the physical impact is not equivalent. Sunlight contains ionizing radiation (hence sunscreen) while WiFi routers do not emit ionizing radiation. You can sit next to a router for your whole life and it will be fine. Maybe if you had a super powerful router, you’d start to worry about thermal radiation since WiFi sits in the microwave part of the spectrum.

So it's kinda like I DO go outside!

Remember when people used to claim cellphones would cause a rise in brain cancer? It used to be repeated constantly in the early 2000s on "real" news channels.

Remember when "4G LTE" was going to spike cancer rates? Same for 5G.

Total clown shit. In many ways I don't blame average hogs for believing insane shit like vaccines are bad or don't do anything. They've been lied to so many times about everything else. Now we have a professionally bad liar as the health guy and Congress (democrats obviously) were last seen spinning in their chairs going "Uh, what can we do? Guess we'll do nothing!"

I guess there will be no attempts at third parties either for mid terms or even probably for next presidential election. Everyone is just lying down in the highway and waiting for the inevitable.

@Grok is this true? And how do we kill the sun?