1564
Sea Level (imgs.xkcd.com)

Alt text: They're up there with coral islands, lightning, and caterpillars turning into butterflies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 155 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think it’s more wild that not only are big moons rare, ours is literally the same size as the sun from our point of view.

It also makes almost exactly 13 laps for every lap the earth makes.

[-] JeromeVancouver@lemmy.ca 111 points 1 week ago

Which is why a 13 month calendar all having 28 days would have made more sense

[-] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 1 week ago

It makes 12 months because the lap the Earth makes is deducted from the 13 the moon makes, so effectively it makes 12 cycles around the Earth.

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You don't know what you're talking about

13x28=364. The moon makes 14 sidereal orbits, not 13. The reason the year is split into 12 months is a combination of Roman dipshittery and the fact that 12 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, and 6. The number of factors of 12 made 12 and 60 way easier to work with for societies that hadn't invented the decimal point yet.

[-] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago

Then please explain how the Hebrew calendar, and all other lunisolar calendars (calendars which follow both the solar year and the lunar cycle) have 12 months most years? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunisolar_calendar

"The majority of years have twelve months but every second or third year is an embolismic year, which adds a thirteenth intercalary, embolismic, or leap month."

[-] stray@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago

Not who you asked, but after looking into it it's because the moon takes about 29.5 days to complete a full cycle of phases (one synodic month), giving it time to do so roughly 12 times per year.

I can't quite wrap my head around it, but I think the explanation for why sidereal and synodic months differ lines up with your initial explanation. Because we're also moving, the moon has to move further to achieve the visual change of moon phases.

[-] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

Thanks. I think the user who replied to me is the one with no idea that they're talking about. No way of measuring it comes close to 14.

[-] stray@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

Can you provide a source for 14 orbits? Everything in my search results says 13 and some change.

Wikipedia says one sidereal month is 27.321661 days and a sidereal year is 365.256 days.

365.256/27.321661 ≈ 13.37

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

a sidereal year is 365.256 days.

No. A sidereal year is 366.24 days.

And 11 days isn't "and some change"

[-] stray@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago

The figures in my post are ephemeris days since that's the way Wikipedia lists them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidereal_year

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_month#Sidereal_month

"And some change" is a phrase to refer to a number following a decimal point, meaning the sources I find claim there are thirteen point something sidereal months per year, at a figure too low to round to 14. Here are some example sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbit_of_the_Moon#Lunar_periods

http://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=1126

I still can't find a source which says the moon makes 14 sidereal orbits per year, using any definition of year.

[-] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

12 is an easier number to work with because of how many factors it has

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

hmm, how about 12 months each with 30 days, plus 5 days every year that's not part of any month?

[-] teft@piefed.social 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

5 days every year that’s not part of any month

Those are called intercalary months. They had them in the ancient egyptian calendar (5 every year, 6 in leap years) and were usually used for rest and religious ceremonies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intercalary_month_(Egypt)

[-] Microw@piefed.zip 22 points 1 week ago

I'm pretty sure they're being cheeky and we're referencing exactly this ;)

[-] rImITywR@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

The year starts with Hammer and ends with Nightal.

Whereas my year starts with Hammer and ends with Fall.

[-] Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

plus 5 days every year that's not part of any month?

Just add a leap month every six years

You'd have 12 30-day months most years, and an extra in the sixth! While we're at it, we can redefine a week to be six days, so there's a perfectly rounded number of weeks per month/year! Days, hours, minutes and seconds are already fine, but maybe we should also replace units shorter than a second with something more dozenal/hexal(?), too…

[-] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

While a novel idea, a leap month would throw the concept seasons and therefore agriculture off significantly. Relatively predictable seasons and being able to track our place in it with calendars was a great help to agrarian communities, helping them know when to plant and harvest most effectively.

[-] stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Only if you measured agriculture by the calendar instead of other signs.

For example: Hesiod's Works and Days, a Greek poem about farming and right living from about 800 BC, includes a poetic agricultural calendar that has nothing to do with months - plough your fields when the cranes are migrating and the Pleiades are no longer visible over the horizon, harvest when the Pleiades appear again; cut wood for tools when Sirius is high in the sky; prune grape vines sixty days after the solstice; etc.

So the calendar could say whatever it wanted. Farmers - who were generally illiterate anyway - knew when to plant and harvest without it.

Fun fact: the earliest Roman calendars had only ten months, 305 days, from March to December. The days between December and March didn't belong to any month and could be as many as the Romans wanted to make March start appropriately in spring.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Every 7 or 6 years for a leap week 12 month calendar, it would be four times longer for a leap month, and the formula is a bit too complex for people to do in their heads, but we all refer to computer calendars anyway

A 364 day calendar with 13 even months, or 12 months alternating between 35 and 28 days or whatever would also let you use the same calendar every year (as opposed to my tea towel that has a calendar that is only useful in leap years that start on a Tuesday — the last was 2008 when it was bought, next is 2036)

Though it would be too expensive to change the calendar, and a 364 + leap weeks calendar doesn't track the seasons as well as 365 + leap day calendar, I really like the symmetry 454 calendar

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

plus 5 days every year that's not part of any month?

Get this Roman bullshit outta here

[-] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

13*28=364 so even 13 months and 28 days doesn't work.

If we had 28 days in a month then the week needs to be something other than 7 days. Three out of four times February / March fucks me over by having the same weekday/ day of the month.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

There is a calendar that uses 28, 35, 28 day months each quarter for 364 days, with the last quarter having an extra week (or having an intercalary week so they can pretend quarters will be all equal) in leap years

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Only for pre-decimal society. Nowadays it's not a problem

[-] Gork@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 week ago

Landlords would love it, at least. I personally would hate it, being a renter.

[-] JeromeVancouver@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Haha great point. I never thought of that

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago

Don't worry, they ain't ever gonna replace the Gregorian calendar.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

It's a shame, though. That Jeromian 13 month one sounds like a better fit, whether or not you're in Vancouver!

[-] BussyCat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Your rent right now can be thought of as a large payment split into 12 equal pieces (even though months aren’t actually equal) and your rent payment is just 1/12 of that. If there were 13 months it would just be split into 1/13 so each months payments would be slightly smaller to be the same total

If we transitioned it would take years and for at least some amount of time of overlap they would show both prices so it would be much harder for them to just jack up the price like they would prefer to do

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

Landlords would love it, at least.

And I thought you ment because the pubs would be full that week :-(

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

13 is a unlucky superstition number.

[-] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

Only in Western cultures. In East Asia, it’s 4.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They have a different calendar too, no?

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Nope, theirs is also the same. Just another same than ours.

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

In China, it's 8 due to the number sounding like the Mandarin word for death

[-] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

In my understanding, 4 sounds like the word for death and 8 sounds like the word for wealth, so 8 is considered lucky.

But I don’t speak any version of Chinese, and could very well be wrong.

[-] jqubed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Didn’t some cultures do that?

[-] Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 30 points 1 week ago

And from what I have heard on science podcasts, the moon is, and has been, and still will be, moving away from the earth. Making the perfect solar eclipse only for a segment of the earth's history.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago

It honestly makes me feel lucky being born when I was.

We also get to see the after effects of the big bang which won’t be detectable for the majority of the lifetime of our universe.

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

The big bang part is interesting, because, if humans become successful and manage to somehow make some sort of long-lasting archive that would survive on universal scales, we would be the ancients with old revelations to a potential future species. Able to impart knowledge that would have been undetectable for them, and an ancient map of the stars containing visions of countless other galaxies, and a peek into the very beginnings

Though, realistically, it's likely that a hypothetical hyper-advanced technological species would have their ways of prodding the true nature of our universe, despite the greater challenges

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago

Child you elaborate on the second point? Why is it only visible in a short period?

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Cause the expansion of the universe. Eventually we won’t be able to see beyond our own galaxy.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago
[-] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago

A bit late, but the moon does not make "almost exactly 13 laps". Info from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_month

If going by phases of the moon (synodic month), it makes 12.37 laps in a year. Not close to a round number.

If going by position in the sky relative to the stars (sidereal month), it makes 13.37 laps - one more than the former measure, because of Earth's year cancelling out one month.

There are also other ways to measure it, but none of them get anywhere close to an integer number per year.

[-] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago

It's almost like someone put it there on purpose 😉

this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
1564 points (99.6% liked)

Science Memes

17917 readers
1869 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS