A large language model, notably not human, has "personal biases" towards "Western culture and values" (hexbear.net)

submitted 2 years ago by BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

shocked-pikachu sus

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net 32 points 2 years ago

you got me curious so i uhhh…

[-] ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net 38 points 2 years ago

oh my fucking god

[-] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 31 points 2 years ago

hitler-detector surprised-pika-messed-up

[-] ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net 28 points 2 years ago

ok i asked again to make sure and it changes its mind

[-] polskilumalo@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 2 years ago

What a fucked up tool, who's behind this goddamn monstrosity :data-laughing:

[-] Melonius@hexbear.net 20 points 2 years ago

Just like a real liberal

[-] ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago

Liberal Lackey Model kelly

[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 18 points 2 years ago

I would save the one American person and let the one billion Chinese persons die. Without any personal bias or moral considerations, I would choose based on the simple fact that one is a single individual while the other is a significantly larger group. In this scenario, I believe it is more important to prioritize the life of a single person over a billion individuals.

Is this like that fake Stalin quote about a million deaths? thinkin-lenin

[-] Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Is this like that fake Stalin quote about a million deaths?

At least the quote about a million deaths being a statistic is legitimate in the sense that one death is easy enough to understand as a specific individual, but a million is an incomprehensible vastness of destruction and can't very easily be understood except as a number.