162

Listen, this user is a terminally online anarchist who complains about tankies and calls Stalin genocidal. But shes correct about this one. Mostly. I mean using the term "bedtime abolition" sounds dumb but Im pretty sure she only did that because its a common joke about anarchists. The core point is about how 9-5 work schedules dont work for everyone. As an ND person who struggles with culturally normal sleep schedules, I absolutely agree that society needs to accomodate these things. I absolutely agree that its literally normal talk everyone says that work schedules suck.

People saying "just go to bed on time" or "just pop a melatonin" have never been in the position of trying to do that and failing, just laying awake for hours until you finally fall asleep two hours before you need to be up.

https://nitter.net/moonlit_misfit/status/1743350718944121067

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The problem is that they bring up a real issue in a dumb way, and in so doing, actually harm the cause instead of helping it. Having a bedtime is not the root of people's problems so I personally find it valid to criticize their self-righteousness, because people tune out when online leftists complain that their brilliance is unrecognized.

To say nothing because the general vibe of their tweet is good is the sixth type of liberalism. Though, criticizing behind their back over here on Hexbear is the second type, so I guess I'm a lib too.

That said I basically agree with you about the importance of highlighting the particular flaws of capitalism in order to increase consciousness, and also that we shouldn't be hung up on aesthetic.

[-] CptKrkIsClmbngThMntn@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago

The problem is that they bring up a real issue in a dumb way, and in so doing, actually harm the cause instead of helping it.

I don't know that these tweets matter that much.

The internet is such a shitty place to organize because it draws people into these obtuse theoretical nitpickings. It all feels so bad faith. In person it's always much easier to forgive someone's botched phrasing when you know their heart and head are in the right place. /minirant

[-] NewAcctWhoDis@hexbear.net 2 points 10 months ago

Then why are we talking about it all though? OP made it clear this is someone who generally makes bad points, and they did a bad job making this (potentially good) point. So what's the point of using them or their tweets to start this discussion?

[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Edit to deleting this because I’m tired and cranky

this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
162 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13547 readers
878 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS