206
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 100 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Uh, oh. What was the vote? Do I want to know?

---

Edit

While the decision was unanimous, the liberal justices wrote a sharp concurrence that accused the conservative majority of going further than needed

Oh! A sharp concurrence!

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 45 points 6 months ago

It was unanimous to put him on the ballots

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 53 points 6 months ago

While the decision was unanimous, the liberal justices wrote a sharp concurrence that accused the conservative majority of going further than needed

Oh, my. Hohoohohooooooyhooasfoohooasfoi;jmsdkl;fmn iwaek ln sdaf oh shit.as.d fasdf'ojka;sdmkaf kjasdfiiidiiiiiiiiiiii                      oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooasd

[-] itappearsthat@hexbear.net 50 points 6 months ago

I have never read a harder cope sentence than "sharp concurrence". Like we make fun of these people for fetishizing losing and dissent, now they fetishize agreeing? What the actual fuck lmao?

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 37 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I like etymology and looking things up. But I don't think I even did a quickie google of the judge/justice use of "concurrence" because legal shit can be so tedious.

---

Nina edit

TIL - there's something even more lib than a "withering dissent". A "sharp concurrence" is the most lib thing possible. I thought a concurring opinion might be complicated. Nope. It's very simple.

Concurring opinion

In law, a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different (or additional) reasons as the basis for their decision.

[-] D61@hexbear.net 9 points 6 months ago
[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Sotomayor Raised an Eyebrow after EVERY Ruling by Supercilious plays.

---

supercilious [] Etymology: early 1500s from Latin superciliosus "haughty", from supercilium "eyebrow".

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 30 points 6 months ago

But they agreed dissidently!

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 30 points 6 months ago
[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 37 points 6 months ago

I better become a malevolent ghost so I can haunt Israel or there will be hell to pay!

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 23 points 6 months ago

Anyone know any good necromantic rituals?

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 31 points 6 months ago

juche-rose how do we not have any juche necromancy emojis with all the fucking memeing we do about it

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 19 points 6 months ago

Sometimes we must be the change we want to see in the world

[-] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I was honestly gonna guess 7-2 or something like that, with the dissenters arguing about how being impeached should impact legal ability to run again or something similar and technical, but without real standing

Liberals continue to be more pathetic than expected

[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 37 points 6 months ago

ain't that the dems in a nutshell. "you're doing exactly what we would do, but too much and too loud!"

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 16 points 6 months ago

The rollin' coal Trump Train leads to fascism.

The Trump Train with the lib caboose also leads to fascism. But it's important to recognize that it's a diesel and it goes slower. Also the libs want Americans to know they are working as hard as they are able are to get permission to paint a rainbow flag on their train car.

[-] wopazoo@hexbear.net 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm pretty sure diesel trains are faster than coal trains. After all, Hitler didn't actually win any elections; he was appointed by Paul von Hindenburg.

[-] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 19 points 6 months ago

"Sharp concurrence" lol

Cannot write a more succinct and damning summary of democrats and libs in general

[-] edge@hexbear.net 12 points 6 months ago

I didn't know "scathing dissent" had an even worse sibling.

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 6 points 6 months ago

I entirely forgot about concurrences. I have a TIL comment lower in this thread - https://hexbear.net/comment/4663388

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
206 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13447 readers
997 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS