206

submitted 8 months ago by VILenin@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

60 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 45 points 8 months ago

It was unanimous to put him on the ballots

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 53 points 8 months ago

While the decision was unanimous, the liberal justices wrote a sharp concurrence that accused the conservative majority of going further than needed

Oh, my. Hohoohohooooooyhooasfoohooasfoi;jmsdkl;fmn iwaek ln sdaf oh shit.as.d fasdf'ojka;sdmkaf kjasdfiiidiiiiiiiiiiii oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooasd

[-] itappearsthat@hexbear.net 50 points 8 months ago

I have never read a harder cope sentence than "sharp concurrence". Like we make fun of these people for fetishizing losing and dissent, now they fetishize agreeing? What the actual fuck lmao?

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 37 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I like etymology and looking things up. But I don't think I even did a quickie google of the judge/justice use of "concurrence" because legal shit can be so tedious.

---

Nina edit

TIL - there's something even more lib than a "withering dissent". A "sharp concurrence" is the most lib thing possible. I thought a concurring opinion might be complicated. Nope. It's very simple.

Concurring opinion

In law, a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different (or additional) reasons as the basis for their decision.

[-] D61@hexbear.net 9 points 8 months ago

"A sternly unpleasant glare" dennis-stare

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Sotomayor Raised an Eyebrow after EVERY Ruling by Supercilious plays.

---

supercilious [] Etymology: early 1500s from Latin superciliosus "haughty", from supercilium "eyebrow".

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 30 points 8 months ago

But they agreed dissidently!

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 30 points 8 months ago

RIP in peace old friend

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 37 points 8 months ago

I better become a malevolent ghost so I can haunt Israel or there will be hell to pay!

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 23 points 8 months ago

Anyone know any good necromantic rituals?

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 31 points 8 months ago

juche-rose how do we not have any juche necromancy emojis with all the fucking memeing we do about it

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 19 points 8 months ago

Sometimes we must be the change we want to see in the world

[-] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I was honestly gonna guess 7-2 or something like that, with the dissenters arguing about how being impeached should impact legal ability to run again or something similar and technical, but without real standing

Liberals continue to be more pathetic than expected