66

I'm assuming this is somewhat counterproductive but I don't know what I'm talking about when it comes to solar so someone who knows more than me can tell me if I'm being dumb.

Also notice the golf course right next to it, very good for the environment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 5 points 7 months ago

Solar is environmentally destructive

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 17 points 7 months ago

Nuke gang? Since it's 2024 and not 1984, I think solar and wind might be the only sources of power our industrial civilization is able to build fast enough to decarbonize unfortunately.

[-] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 6 points 7 months ago

Nah if we were serious we would build nukes and reduce consumption

[-] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

One nuke plant generates as much power as 10 wind farms, 24/7. Renewables are also intermittent which means they cant displace combined cycle gas.

That's not to say there's no room for wind and solar in the grid, just that we couldn't reliably power the grid this way. It's much better than anything generating CO2, but we shouldn't delude ourselves into thinking it's better than banning bitcoin. It does come at a cost

[-] blakeus12@hexbear.net 4 points 7 months ago

yeah solar and wind are better suited for smaller scale things like streetlights and whatnot

this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
66 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers
932 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS