148
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Posadas@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 17 points 5 months ago

In an open desert with air support, it should be fine. In an urban environment against Guerilla fighters it's not.

But considering their main targets are ambulances and civilian cars, they'll still roll out the tanks anyway

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago

NATOs absolute, unthinking, blind confidence in air power is going to be one of those things historians puzzle over once someone figures out how to 3d print an S600 or some shit.

[-] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 13 points 5 months ago

NATO's idea of a future conflict being just "WWII with better planes and gadgets like drones" probably stems from all the Axis officers in NATO during its inception. Air superiority didn't win Vietnam, nor Korea, not Afghanistan, nor is it currently helping off the coast of Yemen. But they can't change course now, capital has its grips on the industry and expensive planes that can't fly in the rain or VTOL aircraft like Ospreys falling out of the sky be damned.

What air superiority is good for are indiscriminate war crimes, though, so they'll continue to do that. From the jungles of Vietnam to the streets of Gaza.

[-] D61@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago

Guess it was too hard to put an "off" button on the things. joker-troll

this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
148 points (98.1% liked)

chapotraphouse

13561 readers
651 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS