226
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by RNAi@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 114 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's been wild watching the new atheist movement slowly morph into the new batshit religious quack movements in only 10 years

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 67 points 4 months ago

I really don’t get it, like, I thought the reason we were all annoying atheists because of a sense of love for humanity, equality, etc. and seeing that Christianity was the most powerful force for regression and subjugation for the last 1500 years or so.

Like, how did we go from atheism to “protecting western civilization”? What is western civilization if not the societies produced by hegemonic Christianity? My atheism is a big part of what drew me to oppose the values of western civilization. And I really thought we were all on the same page on that.

And I guess I wasn’t entirely wrong, as it seems like Russel Brand went the other way around and became a Christian to keep supporting western ideals.

[-] supafuzz@hexbear.net 49 points 4 months ago

the reason they were all annoying atheists was because islam bad, turns out

[-] buh@hexbear.net 27 points 4 months ago

there's that, but also I think for some of them being a new atheist libertarian was a way to be conservative while separating themselves from the unfun aspects of religious conservative ideology (but specifically the anti-drug and anti sex before marriage parts)

but now they're old, their days of partying and chasing girls are behind them and they've either settled down with a partner or accepted being foreveralone, so they no longer need the veneer of being a fun dudebro, and even if on the inside they don't really believe in religion, they realize that it supports their interests with regard to upholding social hierarchies, so they turn back to it

[-] nohaybanda@hexbear.net 31 points 4 months ago

The new atheist movement was for neocons who didn’t care to do the Jesus stuff but still wanted in on being racist to Middle Eastern people

[-] BashfulBob@hexbear.net 18 points 4 months ago

Christianity was the most powerful force for regression and subjugation for the last 1500 years or so.

Turns out it wasn't Christianity, just aristocracy.

Russel Brand went the other way around and became a Christian to keep supporting western ideals.

He was always a mediocre entertainer. First he rejected Christianity as part of his dog-and-pony show. Now he's come around, because the original bit couldn't pull the same audience. But its always just been a performance. The only thing he cares about as the attention (and the money it generates).

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 15 points 4 months ago

Yeah I mean at that point Christianity was all about bombing people and hating LGBT people and those were big factors for me in rejecting it but it turns out there were also people who rejected it for some other reason and then realized that they'd accidentally undermined their justifications for bombing people and hating LGBT people and had to scramble to come up with new ones.

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 14 points 4 months ago

I really don’t get it, like, I thought the reason we were all annoying atheists because of a sense of love for humanity, equality, etc.

That was what I thought too, and was the reason I moved away from nu atheist stuff

[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Have you thought maybe they just wanted to be mean to the weird sheltered christian kid at school, and girls?

[-] propter_hog@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago

That's certainly my reason for being an annoying atheist

[-] Lussy@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago

This breed of atheism is all about opposing the values of religion that are humane, harmonizing, and fundamentally good. The sense of community and goodwill for others is a tenet of many religions that still hasn’t been completely annihiliated and at least bregudgingly accepted by the most reactionary.

These atheists, in contrast, and ironically enough in the words of steve harvey, truly have zero moral compass that binds them to any sort of pesky virtues that would have them accept others.

[-] JayTreeman@hexbear.net 41 points 4 months ago
[-] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 22 points 4 months ago

They were always unwell.

[-] BashfulBob@hexbear.net 22 points 4 months ago

Reminds me of Christopher Hitchens. A man who made a living on the talk show circuit by tweaking people's noses and saying "Are you mad? Are you mad, yet?"

All fun and games when the people getting tweaked were self-important holy rollers. But as soon as he saw a payday in pissing on anti-war protesters by calling them Islamists, the man was urinating like a fucking fire hose.

Dawkins is just a lower-rent Hitchens.

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago

I really disagree. The guy was argumentative for the sake of it, but I don't think it's fair to say he was ungenuine or just chasing a pay day.

[-] BashfulBob@hexbear.net 20 points 4 months ago

I don't think it's fair to say he was ungenuine or just chasing a pay day.

He did a good job of delivery early on. But once he started defending George Bush Jr - a man who stacked his career on phony religious pandering - the mask dropped like a rock. No one who goes this hard for an American Christian Conservative can possibly hold the views he claimed a decade earlier.

Maybe he changed over time. Or maybe Rupert Murdoch found the price for his soul. But the guy sold out hard all through the '00s.

[-] anarcho_blinkenist@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago

hitchens is the posterboy for the modern trot-to-neocon/fascist pipeline

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago

Fair enough, I've nowt to say but that I disagree.

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 21 points 4 months ago

I tried to steer it in to a militant occult organization but, obvious, i got distracted yelling at the memes guy about Islamic history and forgot to train my godslaying army.

[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago

what a lack of material analysis does to motherfuckers

[-] Blottergrass@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Meh, happened with the boomers. This whole country is designed at every level to stifle progress in left wing thought.

[-] Yllych@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago

They were anti religious without being anti capitalist. So they were farcical Voltaire esque liberals at best

[-] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago

At least Voltaire was savage enough to get exiled multiple times.

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Are either of these people classified as "new atheist"s?

[-] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago

It'd be more accurate to say people like this now attract the types of dudes who would've been really into "logic" and atheism 15 years ago

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago

I was 100% that type of person, and I still don't agree. But maybe it's just me that's out of touch.

[-] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 2 points 4 months ago

I meant the really annoying types who were into weird atheist youtubers

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 2 points 4 months ago

Ah, those types.. definitely wasn't me... side-eye-1

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago

They fall under that same category of "rationalist larpers that is actually a right-wing woo grifter"

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
226 points (99.1% liked)

chapotraphouse

13690 readers
268 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS