I'd think German traffic engineers could come up with a better solution, yet these are everywhere:

The bike paths themselves are desire paths for cars and motorcycles.
To block them off, they put up barriers, but those also block cargo bikes, wheelchairs and strollers, create a collision hazard, and force all cyclists to stop and dismount for no reason.
Of course, they'll be bypassed wherever possible – naturally by cars and motorcycles too, if there's enough room.

Basically the title. I have no idea what's in the market, how much that would cost, or even where to look.

I want to spend as little as possible for a setup that works on Linux (in Steam with Proton).

I'm not a simracer, I just want to be able to stay on the road in My Winter Car.

So, Microsoft has now made the "focused inbox" the standard in Outlook. It lets AI decide for you which e-mails are relevant and shown directly, and which aren't, and hidden behind a button (which is too complicated for the employees at my org to find).
Apparently, e-mails sent from the CEO to the entire org aren't relevant.
I google how to deactivate it.
The entire first page shows AI-written blogs.
On top of the Google page, of course, is an AI summary, which I don't trust.
So I click through to the source it uses.
It takes me to the Microsoft support forum where someone asked that exact question.
And find out that Microsoft now lets AI answer the questions there.

So when I'm looking for how to deactivate an AI, I get a reply by AI that sources another reply by AI.

If I then say "fuck Google" and wade through the official documentation, Microsoft redirects me to a page that AI-translates it to my language. Replacing the "de-de" string in the url with "en-us" I arrive at the original documentation. Which is of course also written by AI.

I'm sick of it.

I used to discover a lot of new music on Youtube, actually.
If you watched a music video you liked, the algorithm recommended related stuff, but also threw you a curveball with <1000 views once in a while.
I stumbled upon a lot of great bands that way.

But nowadays, 3 videos in it'll all be AI slop, so I'm open to new ideas and willing to pay for a service, too.

Explanation:
The crime rate statistic is defined as the number of registered crimes divided by the number of registered residents in a country or area.
"Registered" is important here!

If you add undocumented immigrants to the calculation, the statistic is skewed:
Undocumented immigrants aren't registered as residents for the statistic, since they are, well, undocumented.
However, ALL crimes committed by undocumented immigrants will count towards the crime rate when they're registered by the police.

So even if they were much less likely to commit crime than the resident population on average, the crime rate statistic would still increase. The denominator of the equation doesn't increase by definition, because only legal residents are counted towards the statistic. But the real number of people inside the country who may commit crimes increases.

This is important to know as context when you hear people try to "prove" immigrants are more criminal than citizens, by using the crime rate statistic.