All violence on any "western" country is justified at this point.

Supporting Israel in any capacity should be a war crime punishable by death.

USA killed around the same percentage in DPRK.

IIRC the Cambodian genocide under Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge was 25% of the population. If the Isrealis killed 40% of Palestinians, they have surpassed one of the worst mass murderers in history.

Think they're just going to keep suppressing dissidence until the genocide is complete and then spend the next several years sweeping it under the rug and keep on suppressing until people gradually forget about it and then the Israeli empire of genocide is just an everyday reality.

The narrative will change into there never being any Palestinians at all, and that it was just a bunch of default “Arabs” that were driven to neighboring countries

That's not even the worst case. Israel is a fascist death cult and fascists need enemies. They won't stop at Palestine. If they aren't stopped, they'll continue wars and genocides until they collapse from internal contradictions, outside sanctions or military defeat.

Lebanon is the next obvious target. Also what's left of Syria. More war with Iran too. Remember how while the war on Iran was still going, Israeli politicians already talked about who to attack next? They favored Pakistan, but also had a whole list of other countries, including even Turkey.

But don't think the "West" is safe from Israel! The US empire and others will surely import more and more fascist tactics and actual fascists from Israel to suppress leftists and general unrest as deteriorating living conditions lead to rising class consciousness. It's already happening.

Nazi Germany was always a much more powerful nation, and existed during a time where it was easier for them to gloss over the magnitude of their violence to the foreigners (and there were more foreigners who liked pogroms). Israel is still not on the level of Nazi Germany, not because it's morally superior but because it's just not in a position to feasibly "accomplish" many of the things that the Nazis did and, as deranged as it can be, Israel does still have a mote of self-preservation.

South Africa was actually far less murderous than the Israelis have been (low bar I know).

My point being, imagine making apartheid South Africa look humane.

When the war started, people often defended zionism by saying that if the zionist occupation fell, so would western civilisation. Thing is, they were correct. You see all the western colonists come out of the woodwork and go absolutely all in on zionism cause it's a matter of life or death for them. Without zionism, the western colonists loose eurasia. It would be game over for them on a continental scale. And so, to protect zionism, anything goes.

Israel is a part of the US empire. The US empire acts with impunity. Apartheid SA and Nazi Germany were not part of such an empire

It's US American exceptionalism. What's special is the largest military power to ever exist. Actions of Israel are actions of the US.

What they did that others didn't is be an essential FOB for an imperial hegemony. WW2 was never motivated by saving people from genocide. No one went to war because of that, maybe some individual soldiers but you get what im saying. South Africa was freed from within mostly. Liberals only oppose atrocities occe they've been completed or it inconveniences them

I think the logical conclusion from the events of recent years, and from the basic principle that class struggle superscedes identity politics, it was always "easy" to see that no identity group had an inherently revolutionary, or non-reactionary character.

That goes especially for the followers of abrahamic religions, who dominate large swathes of the globe and whose rulers posses unimaginable wealth.

Amongst these, the followers of Judaism had an even bigger advantage that there existed an exploitative project explicitly design to extract and spread wealth for them, while their numbers are small. This leading to to the result of them consistently ranking amongst the most well-off demographics, that is, the most bourgeoisfied of the proletariat anywhere in the world.

So in that sense, talking of a problem of Jewish supremacism is entirely valid. And yet, such a talk entirely understates the horror of the zionist project. It is not something that merely threatens some abstract ideal of racial equality, it is the lynchpin of western colonialism in the 21rst century. The zionist project very much has the potential to kick-start what might be known as the third world war by future historians, if it hasn't already.

To what end?

Or are Evangelicals still the designated sin eaters