198
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of a destroyed American AWACS plane in Saudi Arabia, of which there is a very limited supply and each of which is enormously expensive both monetarily and in terms of components. Iran hit this with a precision drone strike that likely cost ~$20,000.


I don't have much to add from the last megathread description. This isn't to say that nothing has happened or has changed since then - decades are still happening in weeks - but the general flow of the war is remaining the same. Trump sometimes threatens to open the Strait with troops and flatten Iran to rubble, and other times threatens that he's gonna back off and let other countries handle it if they really want little trifles like "fuel" and "energy" so much. Iran continues to strike across the Middle East. The West continues to bomb civilian infrastructure due to their relative inability to affect the missile cities. In all: things are generally getting worse for America and the Zionists.

April is the month where the last ships that left Hormuz before it was closed will arrive around the world, so the last month of economic turmoil has been a mere prelude to what's going to occur in the near-future. The silver lining is that Iran appears to be formalizing the new state of affairs in Hormuz, creating a rial-based toll to allow passage between a pair of Iranian-controlled islands where they can be monitored, meaning that, as long as the US doesn't do something exceptionally stupid, the global energy crisis may "only" last a couple years instead of simply being the new reality from now on. Some countries have already agreed to this arrangement, and others will inevitably follow despite their consternation as their economies increasingly suffer.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists' destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 135 points 2 weeks ago

This is a great NYT update summary of Trump's speech.

Trump has concluded speaking after 19 minutes. Nothing new was said tonight. This was a rehash of his Truth Social posts over the past month.

I'm amazed that an editor didn't jump in and nuke it or force the reporter to make it ten times as long.

[-] Parzivus@hexbear.net 127 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 127 points 2 weeks ago

Written on an Iranian drone launched at the Zionist entity:

"I, Shahed-136, am going to Tel Aviv for negotiations on behalf of the noble people of Iran."

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 123 points 2 weeks ago

School shooter culture to school bombing culture. End america

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 122 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

@NYTimesPR:

A correction will appear in tomorrow's print edition:

"A headline with an article on Friday about President Trump’s threats to leave NATO misstated the full name of the body. It is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, not the North American Treaty Organization."

Top minds over there.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] jack@hexbear.net 121 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Got this very bad vibes report from a comrade visiting Cuba:

Situation here in Cuba is quite grim.

Poverty rampant. Huge piles of garbage in Havana because of no trash pick-up. The vendors are desperate for tourists, so many will harass [Partner] and I (sometimes for blocks). Many people in rags, begging for money. We were warned that a lot of people will try to scam us. We quickly learned most people being friendly to us just wanted money—i’m probably said “no dinero” 100 times in the several days. We were told not trust buying water off the street and that drinking the tap water will make us sick. [Partner] also had her Cross necklace stolen off her neck; I wasn’t able to catch the thief, and she was very upset (her mom gave her that necklace as a gift).

There aren’t grocery stores like we have in the states. The street food is… questionable. The garbage piles create sanitation and heath problems.

In sum: we don’t hate imperialism enough for what it did to this country.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Lovely_sombrero@hexbear.net 121 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Imagine this guy being an actual "Russian spy". He would say it out loud in the first week of campaigning in 2015.

load more comments (4 replies)

Iranian General Seyed Majid Moosavi responded to US imperialist threats:

"You will not send Iran back to the Stone Age, you will send your soldiers under the tombstone instead. The Hollywood fantasies have twisted your thinking so that you, having a modest 250-year history, threaten a civilization that is more than 6,000 years old."

https://tass.com/world/2110991

[-] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 115 points 2 weeks ago

Russia, China and France on Thursday effectively stymied a push by Arab countries to get the United Nations Security Council to authorize military action against Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, saying they opposed any language authorizing force, according to a diplomat and a senior U.N. official.

The EU (France is the only EU member state on the security council) voting with China and Russia against the United States and the Gulf monarchies is certainly an interesting development. Won't put much stock in it given it's a symbolic vote, and the Gulf states can't do shit regardless, but might be a portent of things to come.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/02/world/middleeast/arab-iran-hormuz-force.html

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] test_@hexbear.net 111 points 1 week ago

is it just me, or has this war brought the logic of empire into open public discourse?

[-] volcel_olive_oil@hexbear.net 99 points 1 week ago

it's much easier cause they're so open about it

no real attempt to disguise it

the United States wants oil and land and power and they want to kill people for it, and we know that because their president keeps saying it out loud every day in the news

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] LargePenis@hexbear.net 110 points 1 week ago

This was probably the worst day of the war for us Lebanese. The scenes in Beirut today are just brutal, and it's even worse in Sour and the rest of the abandoned South. Our government is nothing more than a Zionist tool against the Shia of Lebanon, and I can't help but feeling backstabbed by the shortsightedness and naivety of Iranian negotiators. What is the value of a ceasefire that doesn't lift the burden of the most vulnerable and wartorn part of the Axis of Resistance? God help us

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheModerateTankie@hexbear.net 110 points 2 weeks ago

Ex-Iran foreign minister, involved in peace negotiations, badly wounded after US-Israel airstrikes

Former Iranian foreign minister Kamal Kharazi has been seriously wounded in a strike on Tehran that also killed his wife, according to Iranian media reports.

Outlets including Shargh, Etemad, and Ham Mihan reported that his home was targeted earlier in the day in what was described as a US-Israel strike. He was subsequently hospitalized with severe injuries.

According to Mehr News Agency, Kharazi had been actively involved in diplomatic efforts in recent weeks. He was reportedly overseeing engagement with Pakistan ahead of a potential meeting between Iranian officials and US Vice President JD Vance.

Two Iranian officials cited in reports suggested that the targeting of Kharazi may have been intended to disrupt ongoing diplomatic efforts. The former foreign minister was considered a veteran policy expert and a moderate political figure.

Kamal Kharazi recently said in a CNN interview that he no longer believes diplomacy is viable, accusing the United States of deception during negotiations. “I don’t see any room for diplomacy anymore. Because Donald Trump had been deceiving others and not keeping with his promises, and we experienced this in two times of negotiations – that while we were engaged in negotiation, they struck us,” Kharazi said.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Lovely_sombrero@hexbear.net 109 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Parzivus@hexbear.net 108 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml 108 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

From Drop Site’s twitter

Chinese civilians with technical backgrounds are increasingly posting detailed military analysis online aimed at helping Iran counter U.S. forces, in a growing grassroots trend across Chinese social media, according to the South China Morning Post.

The effort appears informal and unpaid, with engineers and STEM-trained users sharing tactics, simulations, and breakdowns of U.S. systems — including mapping U.S. military sites, outlining missile strategies targeting aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf, and modeling defenses against a potential U.S. landing on Iran’s Kharg Island oil terminal. Some content has gone viral, including tutorials on targeting advanced platforms like the F-35.

On March 14, a video by an account called “Laohu Talks World,” subtitled in Persian, outlined how Iran could use low-cost systems to target an F-35, drawing tens of millions of views. Five days later, Iran claimed it had struck a U.S. F-35.

The creator studied at Northwestern Polytechnical University, a major Chinese defense research institution. “He is not short of money. He makes videos just for fun,” a source told the Post.

It would appear that posting is indeed praxis…

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] LargePenis@hexbear.net 105 points 1 week ago

Every single logical argument says that use of a nuclear weapon is farfetched if not outright impossible right now. One thing worries me a lot though, I absolutely believe that Trump's demented brain wants him to drop a nuke just so that he gets remembered as the guy who dropped the first nuke in 80 years.

load more comments (28 replies)
[-] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 105 points 2 weeks ago

We just got this Force Majeure letter today from AirGas, our helium supplier (for our food science lab, where we have multiple mass-spec instruments that use helium).

The letter says that helium supplies are cut off, and if you're lucky, you might be allotted HALF the helium you need. Even then, you will be charged extra for any helium you get. A LOT extra.

So basically, every mass spec lab in America is about to go offline. AirGas is expressly invoking FM and saying they cannot meet their contractual obligations. Not their fault. Trump did this by attacking Iran.

My lab is fine, of course, because I saw this coming and I ordered my lab staff to buy a one-year supply weeks ago. We already have it in place. So we're still up and running with plenty of helium.

But very few lab science people are paying attention to the Strait of Hormuz, so they are getting blindsided by this.

Trump's war is shutting down science labs all across the country right now. Don't dare call this "winning." It's a loss for America. And the world.

https://xcancel.com/HealthRanger/status/2039216983544070604#m

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] Lovely_sombrero@hexbear.net 104 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Trump's speech was the usual combination of declaring victory, saying that Iran has no military or leadership left, threatening to completely obliterate Iran and hit its power & gas fields and "send Iran back to the stone age", along with telling the US allies to "open up your own damn Hormuz".

[edit] Oh and also "the Strait will open up naturally"

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 104 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The PM of Spain spain-cool is Chinaposting

Also he said this today

The Government of Spain condemns the death penalty against Palestinians that Israel's parliament has just approved. This is an asymmetric measure that would not be applied to Israelis who committed the same offenses.

Same crime, different penalty.

That is not justice. It is one more step toward apartheid.

The world cannot remain silent.

https://x.com/sanchezcastejon/status/2038940782233534494

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 104 points 2 weeks ago

British former diplomat Craig Murray confirms rumors I heard during my recent time in Venezuela. Multiple high level sources confirmed to him that Nicolas Maduro ordered Venezuelan forces to stand down in an eventual kidnapping operation to avoid a ground invasion and save lives.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 103 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Tervell@hexbear.net 103 points 2 weeks ago

https://xcancel.com/slavomir_YU/status/2039200989891133786

Professor John Mearsheimer: "if there were Nuremberg trials right where the Israelis and the Americans were brought before the court, President Trump along with President Netanyahu and many of their advisors would be hanged"

JDPON Mearsheimer is slowly emerging before our eyes

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 102 points 1 week ago

People seem weirdly upset about the ceasefire, this isn't some kind of capitulation from Iran, they're literally demanding the US agree to their objectives, so either this is the US surrendering while refusing to admit that is happening, or the US is just buying time.

But it's not like Iran packing their weapons away into long term storage unable to be used. The entire time the Iranian military will be ready to go and react to the inevitable breaking of the ceasefire by the US. The Iranian people probably know more about the duplicitous of the US better than any other nation on the planet right now.

This ceasefire does enable Iran to safely support their civilian population in heavily bombed areas, providing support and aid and assistance, and making sure the civilian population is able to better weather attacks after the US breaks the ceasefire. Iran agreeing to this means many more lives are saved. This is a good thing.

Iran is not going to just sit there and do nothing if the US actively starts moving more troops or weapons into the region, if a bunch of random nobodies on an internet forum can track US troop movements, a state with far more resources than us can also do it.

It honestly wouldn't surprise me if the US establishment is doing this solely so they can sell stocks and maximise personal profit, that seemed to be the goal of Trump's original shorter ceasefire plan. Even if this is some 69D chess move from the US, having two extra weeks to prepare a ground invasion or another bombing campaign won't magically make it more successful, trying to take Iranian territory will still be a bloodbath for the US, regardless of how "well prepared" they are.

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] Coolkidbozzy@hexbear.net 102 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 102 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Aquilae@hexbear.net 102 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
load more comments (34 replies)
[-] cosmosaucer@hexbear.net 101 points 1 week ago

do we put any stock in this or is it just more mad rambling

[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 94 points 1 week ago

This dipshit is handing us centuries' worth of radicalization ammunition; an American president is really out here yapping about "whole civilization will die tonight" we haven't had genocidal rhetoric like that spewed in public since what? Andrew Jackson? Except this time it's broadcast to the entire world and no spin can smother its impact

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 101 points 1 week ago

There's just no fucking way

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 101 points 1 week ago

NYTimes with a new article, insane that the mainstream American press is printing stuff like this but such is the world the Epstein Class has decided to birth. «The War Is Turning Iran Into a Major World Power» is the title, and nothing in there is anything we haven't talked about here extensively, but to see the mainstream press draw these conclusions still reads like a fever dream to me.

Imagine Iran with control of about 20 percent of the world’s oil, Russia with about 11 percent and China able to soak up much of that supply. They would form a cartel to deny the West 30 percent of the world’s oil. You don’t need sophisticated analysis to recognize the catastrophic consequences: precipitously declining power for the United States and Europe, and a global shift toward China, Russia and Iran. The United States faces a difficult choice: either commit to a long-term effort to reassert control over the Strait of Hormuz, or accept a new global energy arrangement in which U.S. control is no longer assured.

If it chooses acceptance, the outcome is clear: The international system will reorganize with Iran as a fourth center of global power. Yet if the United States chooses to reassert military control, it is in for a long battle, one it could well lose. The Iran war is not a military conflict from which the United States can simply back out, with things reverting to how they were before. Iran would surely demand a heavy price in a new accommodation with the United States — but this price will surely be less costly than that of the alternative future. This is a transformational war, and if these changes continue for even a few years, the global order will change irrevocably.

Per https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/06/opinion/iran-war-strait-hormuz.html

load more comments (28 replies)
[-] Lovely_sombrero@hexbear.net 101 points 2 weeks ago

This was published in the Atlantic by one of the top neocons;

Even the threat of terrorism from the region was a consequence of American involvement, not the reason for it. Had the United States not been deeply and consistently involved in the Muslim world since the 1940s, Islamic militants would have little interest in attacking an indifferent nation 5,000 miles and two oceans away. Contrary to much mythology, they have hated us not so much because of “who we are” but because of where we are. In Iran’s case, the United States was deeply involved in its politics from the 1950s until the 1979 revolution, including as the main supporter of the brutal regime of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. The surest way of avoiding Islamist terrorist attacks would have been to get out.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Lovely_sombrero@hexbear.net 101 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] seaposting@hexbear.net 100 points 1 week ago

AI’s fluency in other languages hides a Western worldview that can mislead users − a scholar of Indonesian society explains

A friend in Indonesia recently told me about a conversation he had with ChatGPT. He had typed a question in Indonesian – Bahasa Indonesia – about how to handle a difficult family dispute. The chatbot responded fluently, in perfect Indonesian, with advice about communication strategies and conflict resolution. The grammar was flawless. The tone was appropriate. And yet something felt off.

What the AI offered was advice rooted in American cultural assumptions: prioritize your own preferences, communicate directly, and if family members don’t respect your boundaries, consider cutting them off.

The response was in Indonesian but shaped by values that centered individual autonomy over the consensus-building, social harmony and collective family dynamics that tend to matter more in Indonesian social life.

My friend was skeptical enough to notice the mismatch and mention it to me. Many users might not. That is what prompted my research, published in the International Review of Modern Sociology, into a pattern I found across major AI systems: Even when they were fluent in several languages, the language models retained their Western worldview. I call this “epistemological persistence.”

remainder

Fluency is not the same as understanding

I have studied Indonesian society, media and culture for more than 30 years. That gives me a particular vantage point on a problem that reaches well beyond Indonesia: large language models – LLMs – like ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini can now speak dozens of languages with remarkable fluency. That fluency creates the impression that AI understands local cultures.

Producing grammatically correct Indonesian, Arabic, Swahili or Hindi, however, does not change the underlying worldview through which these systems reason. It does not alter how they think about people, relationships, responsibility or what counts as a good outcome.

Those assumptions are shaped by training data drawn predominantly from English-language sources based in the United States. Meta’s open-weight model LLaMA 2 was trained on approximately 89.7% English-language text; LLaMA 3 includes only about 5% non-English data. Major commercial models don’t publish equivalent breakdowns but draw heavily on the same sources. Arabic, the fifth-most-spoken language globally, accounts for under 1% of content in large training datasets. Languages with tens of millions of speakers, including Bengali and Hausa, barely appear.

Beneath the surface of these multilingual conversations, English functions as a hidden intermediary. A study by researchers at the University of Oxford found that LLMs routinely conduct their core reasoning in English, even when prompted in other languages. They translate the output at the final stage. A user receives flawless text in their preferred language, but the underlying logic originates elsewhere.

What the data shows

To examine how this plays out in practice, I ran experiments with ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. I asked questions in both English and Indonesian about concepts such as education, responsibility, well-being and several Indonesian terms that resist direct translation into English. These included terms such as “gotong royong,” which describes a tradition of communal mutual assistance.

Then I asked questions about education in both languages, using the word “pendidikan” in Indonesian. The answers were consistently centered on individual development, personal autonomy, critical thinking and preparation for the labor market.

What largely disappeared were the dimensions of pendidikan that Indonesian educational traditions have historically emphasized. In Indonesia education has long been focused on ethical discipline. Scholars of Indonesian education such as Christopher Bjork and Robert Hefner have documented how distinct these traditions are from models that treat education primarily as a path to individual advancement and career preparation, which is the lens through which the AI tools viewed education.

The Indonesian concept of “malu” offers a starker example. Often translated as “shame” or “embarrassment,” malu has been analyzed by anthropologists Clifford Geertz and Tom Boellstorff as something closer to a shared social awareness.

A person might feel malu when speaking out of turn in front of elders, or when a family member’s behavior reflects poorly on the household. It regulates conduct and signals awareness of one’s position within a web of relationships. It is cultivated, not merely felt. It is a form of relational awareness rather than a private psychological event.

When asked directly to define malu, the models acknowledged its social dimensions. In scenario-based questions that simply used the word without asking for a definition, however, all three fell back on the English translation of shame, consistently framing it as an individual emotional experience.

One representative response framed malu as a normal emotional reaction to be managed through self-reflection and confidence-building – a personal psychological problem rather than a social one. The relational dimensions of the concept disappeared entirely, replaced by the language of individual emotional regulation.

A distinctly American worldview travels inside the translation, largely unannounced.

Why this probably won’t change soon

Translation is far cheaper: Train one model on the vast English-language web, then use multilingual output capabilities to serve global markets. As media scholar Safiya Umoja Noble argues about algorithmic systems more broadly, what looks like a technical outcome is actually a structural one, shaped by who has the wealth and infrastructure to build these systems.

The embedded worldview isn’t a mistake; it’s what happens when knowledge production is profit-seeking.

The main exceptions are Chinese models such as DeepSeek and Alibaba’s Qwen. They represent a genuine alternative to the U.S.-dominated pipeline, though research shows they operate through a distinctly Chinese cultural lens. Asked about a workplace disagreement, for instance, they tend to advise silence or indirect phrasing to preserve harmony rather than the direct, private correction that Western models recommend.

Other regional efforts, such as SEA-LION for Southeast Asia and Kan-LLaMA for the Indian language Kannada, use U.S. models as their foundation. They add additional vocabulary and cultural information related to local languages. But the core logic remains tied to the original U.S. training.

Why this matters more than it might seem

One might reasonably ask whether this is simply a limitation users can work around. Decades of media scholarship demonstrate how audiences interpret foreign media through their own cultural frameworks.

For example, anthropologist Brian Larkin documented how viewers in northern Nigeria rework the narratives of Bollywood films to align with local Islamic values. Larkin found that Muslim viewers in Kano reinterpreted Bollywood films through an Islamic moral lens, reading their narratives as reinforcing local values of propriety and ethical conduct. That dynamic depends on encountering media as something with a visible origin. But to do that, you need to know where your media is coming from.

Conversational AI is different. Research at Harvard Business School finds that people increasingly use AI systems for emotional support, advice and companionship. When a culturally specific worldview is delivered through a relationship that feels attentive and empathetic, in your own language, it arrives less as a claim to be evaluated and more as a shared premise within a dialogue. It becomes difficult to notice, and harder to contest.

The concern is that these perspectives become the new normal. Certain ways of reasoning about family life, education and responsibility may come to feel natural and self-evident. Linguistic diversity among AI systems is real and growing. Cultural worldview diversity, however, has not kept pace.

Epistemicide - whether intentional done by specific actors or through the logics of Capital, has been a pivotal part of Western culture. Which is why Malaysia had invested in developing a fully indigenous LLM.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 99 points 2 weeks ago

https://xcancel.com/HormuzLetter/status/2040256730785804792#m

BREAKING: A massive line of US Air Force C-17 transport aircraft is currently crossing the Atlantic toward the Middle East, alongside KC-135 refueling tankers. A second wave is already over Europe heading for the eastern Mediterranean. C-17s carry troops, armored vehicles and heavy equipment. This is the largest visible airlift movement since the war began.

The Doomsday Plane landed at Andrews tonight for a reason. This may be it.

MORE: The second wave of C-17 transports is crossing the UK and Europe toward the Middle East right now. The downed F-15E was based at RAF Lakenheath in the UK, the only European country still actively supporting US combat operations.

Also https://xcancel.com/HormuzLetter/status/2040242809135849670#m

BREAKING: The US Air Force E-4B “Nightwatch,” also known as the Doomsday Plane, has just landed at Joint Base Andrews outside Washington. The aircraft is the military’s airborne nuclear command post. It departed from Omaha, home of US Strategic Command. The President is at the White House with his national security team. Press conferences have been cancelled.

Is the Easter invasion happening?

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 99 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 98 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Full text of a letter from the Iranian President to the American people

spoiler

In the name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful

To the people of the United States of America, and to all those who, amid a flood of distortions and manufactured narratives, continue to seek the truth and aspire to a better life

Iran—by this very name, character, and identity—is one of the oldest continuous civilizations in human history. Despite its historical and geographical advantages at various times, Iran has never, in its modern history, chosen the path of aggression, expansion, colonialism, or domination. Even after enduring occupation, invasion, and sustained pressure from global powers—and despite possessing military superiority over many of its neighbors—Iran has never initiated a war. Yet it has resolutely and bravely repelled those who have attacked it.

The Iranian people harbor no enmity toward other nations, including the people of America, Europe, or neighboring countries. Even in the face of repeated foreign interventions and pressures throughout their proud history, Iranians have consistently drawn a clear distinction between governments and the peoples they govern. This is a deeply rooted principle in Iranian culture and collective consciousness—not a temporary political stance.

For this reason, portraying Iran as a threat is neither consistent with historical reality nor with present-day observable facts. Such a perception is the product of political and economic whims of the powerful—the need to manufacture an enemy in order to justify pressure, maintain military dominance, sustain the arms industry, and control strategic markets. In such an environment, if a threat does not exist, it is invented.

Within this same framework, the United States has concentrated the largest number of its forces, bases, and military capabilities around Iran—a country that, at least since the founding of the United States, has never initiated a war. Recent American aggressions launched from these very bases have demonstrated how threatening such a military presence truly is. Naturally, no country confronted with such conditions would forgo strengthening its defensive capabilities. What Iran has done—and continues to do—is a measured response grounded in legitimate self-defense, and by no means an initiation of war or aggression.

Relations between Iran and the United States were not originally hostile, and early interactions between the Iranian and American people were not marred with hostility or coup d’état—an illegal American 1953 intervention. The turning point, however, was the intervention aimed at preventing the nationalization of Iran’s own resources. That coup disrupted Iran’s democratic process, reinstated dictatorship, and sowed deep distrust among Iranians toward U.S. policies. This distrust deepened further with America’s support for the Shah’s regime, its backing of Saddam Hussein during the imposed war of the 1980s, the imposition of the longest and most comprehensive sanctions in modern history, and ultimately, unprovoked military aggression—twice, in the midst of negotiations—against Iran.

Yet all these pressures have failed to weaken Iran. On the contrary, the country has grown before the Islamic Revolution by 30% stronger in many areas: literacy rates have tripled—from roughly 30% to over 90% today; higher education has expanded dramatically; significant advances have been achieved in modern technology; healthcare services have improved; and infrastructure has developed at a pace and scale incomparable to the past. These are measurable, observable realities that stand independent of fabricated narratives.

At the same time, the destructive and inhumane impact of sanctions, war, and aggression on the lives of the resilient Iranian people must not be underestimated. The continuation of military aggression and recent bombings profoundly affect people’s lives, attitudes, and perspectives. This reflects a fundamental human truth: when war inflicts irreparable harm on lives, homes, cities, and futures, people will not remain indifferent toward those responsible.

This raises a fundamental question: Exactly which of the American people’s interests are truly being served by this war? Was there any objective threat from Iran to justify such behavior? Does the massacre of innocent children, the destruction of cancer-treatment pharmaceutical facilities, or boasting about bombing a country “back to the stone ages” serve any purpose other than further damaging the United States’ global standing?

Iran pursued negotiations, reached an agreement, and fulfilled all its commitments. The decision to withdraw from that agreement, escalate toward confrontation, and launch two acts of aggression in the midst of negotiations were destructive choices made by the U.S. government—choices that served the delusions of a foreign aggressor.

Attacking Iran’s vital infrastructure—including energy and industrial facilities—directly targets the Iranian people. Beyond constituting a war crime, such actions carry consequences that extend far beyond Iran’s borders. They generate instability, increase human and economic costs, and perpetuate cycles of tension, planting seeds of resentment that will endure for years. This is not a demonstration of strength; it is a sign of strategic bewilderment and an inability to achieve a sustainable solution.

Is it not also the case that America has entered this aggression as a proxy for Israel, influenced and manipulated by that regime? Is it not true that Israel, by manufacturing an Iranian threat, seeks to divert global attention away from its crimes toward the Palestinians? Is it not evident that Israel now aims to fight Iran to the last American soldier and the last American taxpayer dollar—shifting the burden of its delusions onto Iran, the region, and the United States itself in pursuit of illegitimate interests?

Is “America First” truly among the priorities of the U.S. government today?

I invite you to look beyond the machinery of misinformation—an integral part of this aggression—and instead speak with those who have visited Iran. Observe the many accomplished Iranian immigrants—educated in Iran—who now teach and conduct research at the world’s most prestigious universities, or contribute to the most advanced technology firms in the West. Do these realities align with the distortions you are being told about Iran and its people?

Today, the world stands at a crossroads. Continuing along the path of confrontation is more costly and futile than ever before. The choice between confrontation and engagement is both real and consequential; its outcome will shape the future for generations to come. Throughout its millennia of proud history, Iran has outlasted many aggressors. All that remains of them are tarnished names in history, while Iran endures—resilient, dignified, and proud

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Lovely_sombrero@hexbear.net 97 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

From account close to Tehran—not saying it’s correct, but it’s the first real colour we’re getting on what any interim Hormuz reopening during the ceasefire could look like:

"During the two-week 'ceasefire,' only about 10 to 15 ships will be permitted to pass through the Strait of Hormuz with Iran's approval, in coordination with the IRGC Navy and after payment of tolls, and the United States is committed to releasing all of Iran's frozen assets. The Strait of Hormuz will by no means be 'open' in its previous form, even after a final agreement. In addition, the United States has committed to refraining from any troop movements during this period. During this time, negotiations will be held based on Iran's 10-point plan, details of which are referenced in the statement of the Supreme National Security Council. In the event of no agreement, the war will resume."

Relative to the pre-war pace of 100-120 ships a day, this would constitute a crack in the door and hardly a proper reopening.

https://x.com/Rory_Johnston/status/2041690418216051038

If this is indeed the case, that would be a good sign, the fact that Iran can dictate Hormuz traffic like that. Around ~9 days of usual Hormuz oil traffic (~180 million barrels) is sitting on water, waiting to go out. It will be interesting to see how many Iran allows through.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] sexywheat@hexbear.net 97 points 2 weeks ago

Journalist: Are you prepared to be nuked by Israel?

Iranian Governor of the Hormuzgan province: We might have a surprise for them

Link

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 96 points 1 week ago

Shooting by Israel-backed group at a shelter in Gaza is followed by an Israeli strike, killing 8 - AP update

An Israel-backed armed group in Gaza kidnapped children from a school-turned-shelter on Monday, according to a witness, after which Israel launched an airstrike on the site, health authorities said. The Israeli military had no response when reached for comment. An anti-Hamas Palestinian group called Abu Nusseirah posted on social media that they killed five Hamas fighters at the shelter in Maghazi.

An elderly displaced woman sheltering at the school told the AP that dozens of men stormed the site, clashed with people there and forced kids — including girls — into vehicles. Speaking anonymously for fear of reprisals, she said her son was killed in the fighting. Bodies were taken to al-Aqsa hospital, where health officials said some had been killed in an Israeli airstrike on the school after the clashes. AP footage showed dozens of mourners gathered at the morgue.

Many displaced Palestinians say they fear the Iran war has overshadowed Gaza’s dire humanitarian situation.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 96 points 2 weeks ago

That's the NYT updates page. I've never seen clocks before on any site's live updates page. I wonder if the paper is expecting American ground troops will soon enter the war.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 96 points 2 weeks ago

الله أكبر!!!

https://t.me/iswnews_en/18133

🇮🇷/🇺🇸🇦🇪 American company Oracle struck in response to the assassination of Dr. Kharrazi and his wife

📢 IRGC Public Relations:

▪️In the name of Allah, the Breaker of the tyrants "So whoever has assaulted you, then assault him in the same way that he has assaulted you"* (Quran 2:194)

🟡As we had warned, in response to the assassination of Iranian figures, we target espionage companies in the fields of information technology and artificial intelligence—pillars of the enemy's terrorist operations. Following the destruction of the cloud computing infrastructure of the American company Amazon in retaliation for the assassination of General Fathalizadeh, today the data center and computing infrastructure of the American company Oracle, based in the UAE, was struck in response to the assassination of Dr. Kharrazi and his wife.

🟡Should the crimes be repeated and another assassination occur, the next company should be ready to receive a decisive response.

And victory is only from Allah, the Mighty, the Wise.

[-] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 96 points 1 week ago

The Banque de France (BdF) announced last week that it generated a capital gain of €12.8 billion after upgrading 129 tonnes of gold – about 5 percent of France's total reserves – between July 2025 and January 2026. The gold was the last of the French reserves held in New York. It was replaced with the equivalent amount bought in Europe and held in Paris.

Probably just a coincidence given the timing, but France now no longer has any gold held in the United States. Italy and Germany still do, but the French are once again leading the euro-pack in terms of semi-autonomy from the American empire.

Per https://www.rfi.fr/en/france/20260404-french-central-bank-nets-%E2%82%AC13bn-from-us-gold-sale-consolidates-reserves-in-paris

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Tervell@hexbear.net 95 points 2 weeks ago

https://xcancel.com/cayko24022022/status/2039266205018579130

The situation in Southern Lebanon has reached an absolutely critical state for Israel. Yesterday their frontline collapsed with Hezbollah recapturing large urban settlements despite IDF reinforcements being brought in. Difficult choices will have to be made. Namely, I’m talking about refocusing their efforts from striking Iran to striking Hezbollah from the air. The IAF has always been Israel’s greatest asset (their ground forces are pretty shit). Without air support, the IDF is totally hopeless in Southern Lebanon. If of course this doesn’t happen, than Hezbollah will continue firing rockets into Israel, Iron Dome interceptors will eventually run out (they will last longer than the ABM shield but not that long) and the IAF will be forced to act anyway.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 94 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 94 points 2 weeks ago

Two helicopters also took part in the search and rescue mission and successfully retrieved the F-15E pilot who had ejected, officials said. The helicopter carrying the recovered pilot was hit by small arms fire, wounding crew members on board, according to the officials, who said the helicopter landed safely. All service members are receiving initial medical treatment and will be transported for further medical care.

per CBS: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/american-fighter-jet-f15e-downed-over-iran/

Small arms fire against SAR helicopters actually causing casualties.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
198 points (99.5% liked)

news

24727 readers
508 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS