[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago

Who would realistically buy Chrome that wouldn’t degrade the consumer experience?

Hopefully noone, so it would lead into more fragmentation in the browser space, which is a good things.

[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago

The manifest v3 changes primary give a lot of security and privacy changes that stop extensions from doing a lot of questionable things in the background on all your page you visit. But that does stop ad blockers from doing a lot of what they currently do - blocking in page elements and modifying the pages you visit.

It also killed a lot of other genuinely useful extensions.

And if security is their main concern they should have spent resources on making sure the extensions they themselves redistribute are safe, not on killing a huge chunk of extensions. Sorry but you'll have a very hard time convincing anyone that getting rid of ad blockers wasn't their primary motive.

But it does not block them from blocking page requests so ad blockers like ublockorigin lite can still function in a more limited capacity to block ads.

It completely changed how they do this, and made it way less effective and more limited. All completely unnecessary from a security standpoint.

[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 7 points 2 days ago

Nah, not if it's corporations or whole countries.

[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 30 points 7 months ago

It's not just that they demand more, they demand more/faster growth all the time. It doesn't matter that the economy has slowed down to borderline recession, it doesn't matter that they pretty much captured all the market they can, they still need to make more and more money every quarter otherwise they're considered a failure even if they are one of the biggest companies in the world.

[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 31 points 7 months ago

Packages or dependencies with only one maintainer that are this popular have always been an issue, and not just a security one.

What happens when that person can't afford to or doesn't want to run the project anymore? What if they become malicious? What if they sell out? Etc.

[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 28 points 8 months ago

...or maybe they just don't want a busy looking logo.

[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 26 points 9 months ago

This is cool but it'll be a nightmare to update.

Also, chances are that if you use Alpine the person using your image already has the base layer downloaded, so your image might actually be "bigger" for most people.

[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 51 points 10 months ago

Good to know which company should be avoided for buying home appliances. I really hope the notice will be the first thing to show ope when you search their name + HA Integration.

[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You want an Xperia. No removable battery (there are almost no "normal" phones with removable batteries) and instead of a popup camera you get a regular front camera in a tiny bezel (so assuming you don't want a stupid hole/notch in the display that's what you want). But they are overall solid phones with excellent DACs and very clean Android. And it's still a mainstream, non-Chinese brand.

The only disadvantage is price, but they target a niche audience. If you can take a deal with headphones or such it's very much worth it.

[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 31 points 1 year ago

Because it has significantly more features than IRC and it's dead simple to spin up your own "server" where you aren't beholden much to "admins" or whatever.

6

I want gestures only on the right side for upvote/downvote. If more were possible I'd still add reply there, but they aren't.

Left gestures are unintuitive to me and they clash with navigating back with a swipe from the left.

When you hold on a comment there are very few options - why is there no reply and other actions you don't have as gestures?

Stuff like visiting the commenter's profile should also be there.

Otherwise an amazing app; a rough around the edges in a few places but still the best from what I tried.

[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 29 points 1 year ago

One they Linus seems determined to ignore so that they can keep raking in big sponsorships and sales of their overpriced over hyped merch so they can buy ever bigger mansions.

I don't think it's that bad; Linus' heart seems to be in the right place but his ego and occasional lack of self-awareness does definitely hurt at least the image. But that's something the new CEO can actually fix, potentially.

As for the need to make money and churn out content, I kinda get the need; he probably feels immense pressure because in order to sustain 100+ people they do actually need to put out a shittin of content and can't really take a break.

With that being said issues like these should be a very strong signal that change needs to happen, and dismissing people's concerns and not being able to put his ego aside will hurt them a lot if this continues.

[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 58 points 1 year ago

What if it's your bank's website? Or email provider? Or literally anything else you actually have to choose and can't pick? "It's okay because I don't think it affects me / I can ignore it" is always a bad reason to allow a bad thing happen.

view more: next ›

amju_wolf

joined 1 year ago