793
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 128 points 11 months ago

We make logging companies "replant forests" (yes it's not at all the same as the old growth but it's something). Why do we let mining companies completely rape the land and replace nothing? It doesn't even look like they backfill with the unused debris, much less restore topsoil or plant anything.

[-] nfamwap@feddit.uk 49 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Here in the UK I know of lots of old mines and quarries that, because the ground is inherently unstable once the mining has finished, the land gets reclaimed as a nature reserve. Think nice walks, wildflowers, native trees, marshlands etc. A lot of effort goes into making habitats for insects, birds and animals.

Whether or not it is all paid for by the mining companies, I don't know.

[-] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

It isn't. I guarantee it.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

That's how we do it here in the US if they're operating near an urban area. My understanding is that they are required by law to do that in exchange for the permits or something.

[-] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 10 points 11 months ago

Only if the city cares. I'm in a capital city where strip mining occurs within city limits, and they just leave acid pools behind because the thick forests keep people from noticing it

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 5 points 11 months ago

Underground mining and strip mining are very different in the possibilities to recover.

Both underground mining and strip mining will devastate natural and urban areas in Germany for centuries. For the former black coal and iron mining areas they basically have no solution except to keep the pumps running indefinitely as the flooded underground mines would collapse, causing sinkholes and eating the houses on top. For the strip mining, these will be scars on the earth until geology has taken care of it in a few million years.

[-] pitiable_sandwich540@feddit.org 23 points 11 months ago

Well, not 100% on this, but maybe because we're an overaged society that elects corrupt politicians rather than accept that change in lifestyle is necessary? Or maybe it is the brainwashing of the Springer-press that continues to vilify the Greens. Maybe a mix of both.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] bob_lemon@feddit.org 19 points 11 months ago

They do backfill, but they obviously lose quite a bit of volume in the process, so they cannot completely fill the hole. The remaining part is usually flooded.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 16 points 11 months ago

Where I live they are required to rehabilitate the land afterwards, but usually that's after the mine has been running for like 30+ years and by the time they shut down, they do some weird financial trickery and declare bankruptcy despite having made millions in profits the previous decades and then they just walk away and tax payers need to clean up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FleetingTit@feddit.org 11 points 11 months ago

It will be turned into a giant lake once they are done mining. You burn a lot of volume and filling it wil soil again is just not possible

[-] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

Except they actually do backfill it and plant trees; it's still an ecological horror though

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

Why do we let mining companies completely rape the land and replace nothing?

The government spend billions to brainwash people and turn them complicit. Check out the "germany rearming" threads to see how even on lemmy plenty of people are happy with the raping.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 93 points 11 months ago
[-] Asetru@feddit.org 51 points 11 months ago
[-] ooterness@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago

The Bagger 288 is there to safeguard all mankind.

The Bagger 288 wreaks total utter devastation.

The Bagger 288 contains an artificial mind.

This mind is full of hatred, violence is its sole vocation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] saltnotsugar@lemm.ee 67 points 11 months ago

Being destroyed by a giant machine is terrible but it did file the proper paperwork first so what can be done at this point?

[-] Infinite@lemmy.zip 16 points 11 months ago

Just enjoy the hyperspace bypass, I expect.

[-] HowAbt2morrow@futurology.today 10 points 11 months ago

There’s a lot to be said about dotted eyes and crossed teas.

[-] Zabjam@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

I hate so much how accurate this is as a metaphor for how many politicians deal with the fascist AfD.

[-] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 54 points 11 months ago

Uhm no bagger-288 was created to protect mankind from godzillas and doom robots from the future.

[-] applemao@lemmy.world 48 points 11 months ago
[-] chellomere@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[-] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 40 points 11 months ago

ok I hate coal and fossil fuels, but this thing is so cool

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago

Alternatively, build a flying machine with TNT duplicators

[-] janus2@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 11 months ago

[ilmango intro music] 🥭🥭🥭

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] j5906@feddit.org 36 points 11 months ago
[-] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 42 points 11 months ago

Those photos are from planes.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Probably, but the entire idea of "you can see it from space" is stupid anyways. Its only meaningful if its with the naked eye and the distance is specified. You can see anything from space if you have enough optical zoom...

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago

You can see anything from space if you have enough optical zoom...

Naw, there's theoretical a maximum resolution, iirc it's a few centimeters. Too much air in the way diffracting the light

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago

You can see people's backyard trampolines.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 32 points 11 months ago

This is very real and has been an issue for years. I remember when I was younger, watching public TV, and I saw a news report about an elderly lady who was forced to sell her home along with the rest of her village so that they could dig up the entire area for coal. At the time it was a big deal, because she took so long to agree, which got media attention. It was incredibly depressing. It felt dystopian.

[-] CoffeeKills@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

It's crazy watching a time lapse of these massive holes move across the land https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz4a2WyAG68

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

It is an engineering marvel, indeed, as it is the biggest mobile machine of the world.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 17 points 11 months ago
[-] Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Ahh, you just beat me to it!

[-] perestroika@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Bagger 288 (and its sibling, Bagger 293) are probably the biggest machines which move freely on soil. They're about 225 m long, 96 meters tall and weigh 14 200 tons.

In the length category, the F60 overburden conveyor bridge (which moves on rails) is (was?) several times bigger, at 502 m length. It weighed less, however, at 13,600 tons.

[-] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 23 points 11 months ago

every rational part of my brain fighting the 7 year old me inside me who knows Bagger 288 is the coolest thing ever

[-] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Looks like a Final Fantasy optional boss.

[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago

It's a man-made Langolier.... slowly eating a dying world no one wants.

[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago

Funny and sad

[-] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

I love how I know the name Bagger 288 because of a 16 year old meme

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Removed from the environment.

[-] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Why remove something from the environment when you can just remove the environment

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Just as well. 'tis a silly place.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
793 points (98.8% liked)

Funny

14756 readers
1440 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS