271

Today the U.S. House of Representatives passed the TAKE IT DOWN Act, giving the powerful a dangerous new route to manipulate platforms into removing lawful speech that they simply don't like. President Trump himself has said that he would use the law to censor his critics. The bill passed the Senate in February, and it now heads to the president's desk.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 69 points 3 months ago

OK so this is meant for revenge porn / stolen photos... but it's written so broadly that it will affect basically any online speech. Great.

[-] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago

it passed. it fucking passed. i don't think people realize what they're about to use this for (or at least they don't fully realize the implications).

[-] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

And a helluva a lot of Dems voted for it like lemmings…

[-] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

They all did along with all but two Republicans. Funny how they have no problem working together on stuff like this, but when it comes to anything that helps the American people suddenly there's a ton of manufactured controversy as if we were watching a scripted pro wrestling match.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 68 points 3 months ago

Another step closer to achieving his Nazi wet dream.

[-] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 44 points 3 months ago

Call it what it is: a censorship law. Apparently the climate of fear that makes people self-censor wasn’t enough.

Watch for a LOT of ‘extreme left’ opinions get taken down and their authors imprisoned.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

It won't stop with journalists and authors. They'll be looking in Facebook posts, Reddit comments, Twitter threads, Instagram, etc. And random citizens are going to start disappearing.
They'll want people to know it can happen to anyone, not just the most visible or high profile critics.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Any chance courts can stop this bill for being unconstitutional.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

The NSA mass surveillance program that Snowden blew the whistle on was found unconstitutional during Obama II. THAT SAME AFTERNOON, the Republican Congress and Senate passed the (I shit you not, this is what this MF is named) USA FREEDOM ACT that basically re-instantiated the program and Obama signed it straightaway. Turns out, they were able to get shit done quick and in a hurry when the shit was fascism.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Can, probably yes, will, probably no

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

And darlen AOC so called progressive voted for this shit.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 35 points 3 months ago

While this is bullshit, we should be able to weaponize it right back at them - any lies the administration spews (which let’s face it, that’s everything) needs to be reported relentlessly.

Make them feel it!

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Reported to who? The people telling the lies?

[-] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago

The article mentioned requiring a reporting mechanism which must be resolved within 48 hours. Because of the impracticality of the timeframe it went on to assume that anything reported would just be removed.

[-] turdburglar@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

gulf of america?

[-] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 months ago

rumor has it that AOC voted for this

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

Not a rumor, only 2 house members voted against (both republican).

mfw we can pass a bipartisan spy law no problem but a bipartisan daylight savings law is still too hard.

[-] raltoid@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They all did, it was 409 vs 2, with 22 not voting:

https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2025/roll104.xml

And ironically the only two Nays came from Republicans.

[-] Seleni@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

She did. She ‘objected to some of the wording’ but jumped in line like a good little puppet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ilmagico@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

censorship is bipartisan, they just want to censor different things

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] errer@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

“Flood the zone” benefits both parties when it comes to power grab shit like this. This barely made headlines until it was already passed and it’s too late.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Anyone else hear thunderous applause?

[-] Zier@fedia.io 12 points 3 months ago

Good news, now we can report all those christians online that won't shut the fuck up!!

[-] WatDabney@fedia.io 6 points 3 months ago

Oligarchs gonna oligarch.

[-] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

House of Representatives passed the TAKE IT DOWN

I am confused. The title say congress passed the bill while the article says the house is the one that passed it (so congress should be next).

Which is it?

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

Congress is the combination of the House of Representatives and the Senate. America has a bicameral legislature. (Congress=House of Reps + Senate)

Because this passed the Senate in Feb and the House recently it is correct to say that this bill has passed Congress.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

The bill has passed both the Senate and House so now the president just has to sign it.

[-] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

Which he would gladly do. Very sad

[-] HeyMrDeadMan@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I want off this ride

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

American decline is happening at a much faster pace than I anticipated.

If you don't own a gun, now is the time.

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Isn’t this what the DMCA is for?

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah but the DMCA was vaguely reasonable. This is meant to be weaponized.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago

the DMCA was vaguely reasonable

No it wasn't. It too was MEANT to be weaponized from day one. The difference is that almost all of the people in control of both parties and all mainstream media were in favor, so it got a false veneer of reasonability in coverage.

The DMCA is just as bad as SOPA and PIPA, which was always the intent from the powerful industry groups lobbying for all three bills and the politicians they own.

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Meant to be or not, it’s still weaponized.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

I think you mean the communications decency act? Most of that has been found to be unconstitutional as will likely be the fate of this bill...

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The democrats pushed this through for the same reason they've pushed other bills to censor the internet, using piracy or CSAM as excuses. They aren't really trying to protect anyone, they want and need control over the population as much as the republicans do, so that they can maintain the cash flow from corporations that own them. So many people still look at the democrats as an opposition party to the fascists, but that isn't true at all. They work together because they're two sides of the same party. The only thing they're truly concerned with protecting is their own money and power.

Both the democrats and republicans are profoundly evil.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 3 months ago

This reminds me of the DNC super donor Ed Buck who would lure in gay black men and kill them by injecting meth into them while raping them.

He managed to do it for years and wasn't until one of the victims survived to be able talk about it that he was sentenced as with every previous body it was said it was a private issue and a sad loss of a friend.
Photos managed to get shared of his racist, rape, death den helping sway the public.

Ed Buck would have loved this bill and its ability to actively scrub his image further.
If it feels like monsters would like something I don't want it.

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

America needs a reset or to be splintered. The one we have is straight up evil.

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

I'm American, and I vote heavily splintered. We are constantly doing shit that is profoundly evil, so we need to be weakened enough that we don't have the ability to project power outside our own borders, for the safety of the Middle East and other small countries the world over.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
271 points (98.6% liked)

News

31361 readers
929 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS