899
On trees... (mander.xyz)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 4 points 19 minutes ago

Same for roots, btw, just earlier.

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago

I think palm trees are a kind of grass

[-] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 3 points 20 minutes ago

I didn’t know that and I agree

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago

I'm firmly in this camp.

[-] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 28 points 6 hours ago

I'm a billion years, crabs will start turning into trees and trees into crabs. merging into the ubercreature

[-] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

"ubercreature" excuse me, lichen would like a word with you

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 28 points 6 hours ago

I'm a billion years

Damn. You look good for your age.

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 4 points 1 hour ago

I'd argue, but I agree. I don't need to know how they look, if they're a billion years and capable of communicating, whatever state they're in looks good. Even if its a fungus posessed rot monster.

[-] VernetheJules@hexbear.net 4 points 6 hours ago

you may not like it but Ms Crabtree is what peak performance looks like

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 54 points 9 hours ago

Also cool that for a period of like 60 million years, nothing decomposed dead trees. As they would die or fall over, they'd just stay there, piling up. This is where most oil came from. The massive amounts of trees stacking up before bacteria and fungus evolved to decomposed them. Imagine 60 million years worth of trees just lying around.

[-] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 hour ago

I imagine dead trees were flammable, even back then. And oxygen levels were 15% higher. Can you imagine the forest fires?

[-] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 24 points 8 hours ago

Didn't those trees become coal, not oil?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 hours ago

I love this fact, and am curious where you learned it?

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 8 hours ago

I learned it nearly 30 years ago in school. I just did a search and found a link about it, though.

Also, seems that either I remembered wrongly, or my teacher made a mistake, but it seems it was most of the worlds coal; not oil, that came from all the piles of trees from that period.

https://www.thorogood.co.uk/treevolution-how-trees-came-first-and-rot-came-later-in-earths-deep-past/

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 12 points 9 hours ago

Its basically just the best way to be a large plant if you're not gonna be a big parasitic ivy. Once your plant circulatory system gets complex enough to send stuff further away, you start getting big enough that you need hard tissues just to stop yourself from folding over.

[-] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 7 points 8 hours ago

Trees are like every other plant, ONLY MORE SO

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 30 points 11 hours ago

Also, no such thing as fish.

Google it.

[-] boydster@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 hours ago

Impossible. If there were no such thing as fish, how could bees be fish?

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 25 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I don’t have the tools to know how to respond to this comment. You win.

Edit: Holy shit. I just did a quick google. Boydster is not shitting us. Just google “bees are fish.” Oddly enough, this actually furthers the thesis of fish not existing.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I don’t have the tools to know how to respond to this comment. You win.

This is the best way I've ever seen utter befuddlement expressed. Chapeau!

[-] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 hours ago

Beavers are also fish.

[-] Devmapall@lemm.ee 14 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

To add on for anyone who is lazy like me, the thing where Google summarizes says California has classified bees as fish under an environmental protection act. According to the first result (Reddit) it's because fish is a catch all term in that law. Instead of listing all the animals they just use fish. Because fish,bees, and the other animals are all invertebrates.

Now whoever reads this has three Lemmy comments, a reddit thread reference, and an ai overview reference as some solid sources

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 12 points 8 hours ago

Fish are vertebrates they have a backbone

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 39 points 11 hours ago

My sister in law recently quipped that "Trees are a social construct" and at first I thought she was just being glib but now I can't get that statement out of my head.

[-] resting_parrot@sh.itjust.works 17 points 10 hours ago

I listen to a podcast called Completely Arbortrary. They talk about a different tree species each episode. They say trees are a strategy, not a strict definition.

[-] SOB_Van_Owen@lemm.ee 4 points 7 hours ago

Thanks! Just subscribed. See they have a couple Metasequoia episodes -a favorite of mine .

[-] hash@slrpnk.net 36 points 11 hours ago

So that's why every stargate planet looks like Canada

[-] Knuschberkeks@leminal.space 2 points 5 hours ago

Sadly Lemmy isn't big enough to support niche communities, but I really enjoyed r/unexpectedstargate back in the day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] m_xy@lemmy.world 42 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

here’s a cool blog post that expands on this There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically)

i didn’t even put it in a bookmark folder, it’s just loose on my bookmark bar because it’s such an interesting post that i reread from time to time

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 118 points 15 hours ago

Had to look it up because I didnt beleive

sure enough its correct

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree

[-] ch00f@lemmy.world 99 points 15 hours ago

Something poetic and quaint about a link to a Wikipedia article titled "Tree"

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] twice_hatch@midwest.social 33 points 13 hours ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee 36 points 13 hours ago

Its called convergent evolution and you also have some shit you wouldnt believe that makes all apes similar to us.

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 hours ago

Apes are so similar to us because we came from a common ancestor. I'd love to hear if there are traits we evolved independently after we split though.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
899 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

14653 readers
2864 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS