Hamas, known for their extreme wealth and massive global presence
these people can't deal with the idea that they're the bad guys, so they have to make their victims both extremely all-powerful and weak and pathetic. i don't understand how they don't notice the dissonance.
Hamas, known for their extreme wealth and massive global presence
Funded by Israel
It would honestly be more reasonable to accuse her of funding Hamas than being funded by them
I love the liberal obsession with the idea that all of their enemies must be secretly paid off by [insert State Department-designated enemy here]
They are following the natural and good inclination to "follow the money" but because they're liberals they think it's like literally shady guys passing manilla envelopes.
Libs and chuds both have like an imagination terminus, a horizon of reality guided by media. So the chud convinced of Soros Bucks and Antifa Supersoldiers and the lib convinced of Russiagate Election Hacker Cheeto Putino stand on opposite edges of the same chasm of ignorance hurling insults at each other.
I understand horseshoe theory now thanks
They are following the natural and good inclination to "follow the money" but because they're liberals they think it's like literally shady guys passing manilla envelopes.
It would explain why bribery is so easy. As long as you don't say, "this is a bribe!" and give someone a sack of money with a dollar sign on it (or literal gold bars), then you can get away with it (see the Supreme Court trips and gifts, lobbyists for Congressmen, the whole donation ecosystem, everything Trump has done this term and the last between having people stay at his hotels to his Qatar jet, etc.).
Well at least certain people can get away with it. It seems very inconsistent. Most grunt workers can't accept a movie ticket from a client, let alone bigger things, for example.
That is perfectly succinct I am stealing that.
"I would never get off my ass to do anything without getting paid for it, so obviously no one else would either"
Liberals can't imagine having any firm convictions or sincere beliefs, so the only reason someone would take a stand is if they would directly gain from it.
that extends to chuds, who I guess can be considered a type of liberal by definitioan
Huh, from now on I think when someone says that about China, Iran, etc I'm going to have to ask them how that's any different from claiming it's the Jews.
Seeing video of Rahaf giggling and playing around on her two prosthetic legs with Ms Rachel made me fucking sob, man. Seeing kids suffering is devastating, but it wrecks me to see how after all they've been through they can still be kids, still have fun and laugh, and knowing that thousands of those children will never even get the chance to experience that again. It makes me feel so sick and empty.
In an interview about Rahaf’s family, Ms Rachel said that Rahaf and her mother used to have meals together with her father and brothers over video call and they’ve stopped doing that because of how scarce food is. And Ms Rachel keeps posting videos of kids in Gaza surrounded by rubble watching her videos. It’s heartbreaking for the reasons you’ve stated.
Yeah, that destroyed me. How the fuck did we even get here
Really shows how fragile the fascist worldview is. They cannot allow anyone to oppose them, regardless of how minor or how much of a non-threat. They must expend massive amounts of resources making sure their viewpoint is the only one allowed, because even the mere idea that they could be wrong is enough to challenge their entire worldview.
Do you think it's the same strangeness that Republicans have? "Are you asking if Republicans are fascist?" Sure, but it reminds me of how it's not just that they should be able to be antisocial with impunity, we have to think they're cool for being hateful too. Like you have all this power and control, so why bother with what we think about it? Is it perhaps the very idea that the thing you're conserving sucks is an existential threat? Like you had to build it up in your head and commit a bunch of, if not physical, spiritual violence to be based in a system that turns out to suck?
Breaking news: a woman who loves children is appalled by children being mass murdered
I fucking hate this recent round of hasbara because it's really cemeted the idea in the liberal mind that antisemitism is when you disagree with an Israeli.
It has cemented that for anyone over 45.
Meanwhile everyone under 30 is officially over Israel's shit.
This is why the Hasbara has gotten so bad, they used to be able to count on a large pool of support across demographics but that has changed, they have lost everyone who is too young to have voted Clinton. As the genocide continues it gets worse for them. They continue the Genocide because at this rate President Buttigeg won't be able to provide cover if they try this again in 10 years, so it is either use their political capital now or watch it disappear.
They lost Piers fucking Morgan FFS.
Has it? I think Israel has very little support among American liberals these days. This hasbara is no longer at all effective.
Yup, if/when actual antisemtism spikes, it will be because of this insistent conflation
arm Ms Rachel
Ms. Rachel in a mech.
Imagine being mad at someone because she's advocating for children with the bad and wrong skin color. Zionazis are so fucking racist man.
Hoo boy have I a story for you!
Apparently a hospital had pictures drawn by Palestinian children which they took down because a pro-Israel group told them it was making Jewish patients feel uncomfortable and harassed; many of those children are probably dead now.
Yeah I remember this story, christ.
Given that 82% of Israelis support the expulsion of all Palestinians from Gaza and roughly half support killing all residents of a "conquered enemy city", any humanisation of Palestinians is extremist.
Link below, it is hidden behind a paywall.
There’s a lot of moms constantly talking on tiktok about how they’d go to war for Ms Rachel. I think the Zionists are barking up the wrong tree here
The first rule of working retail is don't mess with white moms, especially when you are in the wrong. They might actually use their righteous wrath and privilege to crush you.
No no let them bark.
The radicalization of single mothers coparenting with their TVs is real
Matt Lieb said that if you make parents choose between abandoning Ms Rachel and being Hamas, you're gonna have everyone choose to be Hamas.
Hamas propaganda is when you ask people to have empathy for human beings.
I'd never heard of her, but my kid's the right age and needs more exposure to English, so now her channel is on for hours a day in the supafuzz house
Good choice too. The way she does her show is top tier for developing toddler brains.
How can anyone take: "From nursery rhymes to Hamas lines" seriously? That sounds like something from Robot Chicken.
What the fuck is a Hamas line.
"palestinian children should not be murdered"
Probably one of those "25,000 children have died according to the Gaza Health Ministry - who are run by Hamas."
They're still trying to find something as catchy as "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free"
Today we call upon the full power of the united states executive system to investigate barney the dinosaur for too many smiles and hugs. -very normal empire a few decades before dissolving
I was on the I don't watch that stuff so I don't have an opinion. That just changed. Go Ms Rachel
This is just yet another proof of the smear campaigns backfiring and hasbara losing ground
If you tell parents that the one unproblematic children's youtuber is antisemitic, they are going to look into the claims before switching back to Caillou or Spider-Man impregnating Elsa
I will defend Ms Rachel to the death if it keeps Blippi out of my house.
broke: “thats antisemitism”
woke: thats based and rachel pilled
news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --