1069
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] wellbuddyweek@lemm.ee 80 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Actually, those are not the same. Natural numbers include zero, positive integers do not. She shoud definately use 'big naturals'.

Edit: although you could argue that it doesnt matter as 0 is arguably neither big nor large

[-] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 61 points 1 week ago

Natural numbers only include zero if you define it so in the beginning of your book/paper/whatever. Otherwise it's ambiguous and you should be ashamed of yourself.

[-] wellbuddyweek@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

Fair enough, as a computer scientist I got tought to use the Neumann definition, which includes zero, unless stated differently by the author. But for general mathematics, I guess it's used both ways.

[-] Zwiebel@feddit.org 45 points 1 week ago

Natural numbers include zero

That is a divisive opinion and not actually a fact

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah, it's a matter of convention rather than opinion really, but among US academia the convention is to exclude 0 from the naturals. I think in France they include it.

[-] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

positive interers with addition are not a monoid though, since the identity element of addition is 0

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] errer@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Big naturals in fact include two zeroes:

(o ) ( o)

Spaces and parens added for clarity

[-] Jerkface@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

(0 ) ( 0)
You can't fool me.

[-] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

(o Y o) solve for Y

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] peregrin5@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago

Depends on how you draw it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Atlusb@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

Also in an aqueous environment, they become floating point values.

[-] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago

Big Naturals Are More Pronounced

ftfy

[-] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 19 points 1 week ago

Large nonnegative numbers*

[-] Tenkard@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago

If they're big the zero is skipped anyway

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Just write it bigger.

[-] jxk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the comment - - I will fight for recognizing zero as a natural number

[-] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

In mathematics, the natural numbers are the numbers 0, 1, 2, 3, and so on, possibly excluding 0.[1] Some start counting with 0, defining the natural numbers as the non-negative integers 0, 1, 2, 3, ..., while others start with 1, defining them as the positive integers 1, 2, 3, ... .[a] Some authors acknowledge both definitions whenever convenient.[2] Sometimes, the whole numbers are the natural numbers as well as zero. In other cases, the whole numbers refer to all of the integers, including negative integers.[3] The counting numbers are another term for the natural numbers, particularly in primary education, and are ambiguous as well although typically start at 1.

Sauce

So it is undefined behavior, great

[-] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes. Some mathematicians think that 0 is natural, others don't. So "natural number" is ambiguous.

In order to avoid ambiguity, instead of using fancy "N", you should use fancy "N0" to refer to {0,1,2,3,4,...} and "positive integers" to refer to {1,2,3,4,...}.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If your array doesn't start at zero I'm not sure we can be friends.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 week ago

Gandalf's large positive integers

Like that?

[-] weird@sub.wetshaving.social 8 points 1 week ago

Oh wow. Do we have a lemmy community for that?

[-] gay_sex@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

be the change you want to see!

[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

I don't care if they're big, as long as they're real

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

I don't care if they're real, as long as I can manipulate them

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 1 week ago

They're Real, and they're fantastic.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

You like big figures and you cannot lie?

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Imaginary ones are useful too.

[-] AngularViscosity@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago

Don't get me started on the unnatural and supernatural numbers.

[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago

Sound made up, like imaginary numbers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bosht@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

This actually got a chuckle out of me. Prob the first number related joke I've laughed at.

[-] zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

I like naturals, but more than a mouthful is kind of a waste. ;-)

[-] Jerb322@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

https://youtu.be/B8dldLG_ZhI

"Anything bigger than a handful, you're risking a sprained tung"

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago

That's true OP, "big naturals" are indeed very pronounced.

[-] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

Natural Numbers ≠ Integers though.

In spite of that, I'm chuckling. Math can be funny sometimes 😂

[-] MBM@lemmings.world 16 points 1 week ago

Positive integers are (a subset of) natural numbers

[-] ewenak@jlai.lu 4 points 1 week ago

Why a subset? They're the same thing right? I guess it could be about the zero?

[-] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

you answered your own question

[-] ewenak@jlai.lu 3 points 1 week ago

Well what I learned in school was that zero was both positive and negative. I knew some people consider the natural numbers don't include zero, but I didn't know for some zero isn't even positive.

[-] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

it is neither positive nor negative

[-] deltapi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I knew a physicist who considered 0 negative if she arrived at 0 coming from negative source numbers and positive if coming from positive sources.

Something something sampling rate

[-] MBM@lemmings.world 2 points 1 week ago

Some places (like France) talk about positive and strictly positive, others (like England) about non-negative and positive

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I just say “big’uns”

[-] isekaihero@ani.social 5 points 1 week ago

big badonka-donkadonks

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

we like to see those Double negative intergers.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 points 1 week ago
[-] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Be glad it isn't Positive Integers Venti

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
1069 points (99.3% liked)

memes

15619 readers
2559 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS