If I have to listen to sonic booms every fucking day I am going to lose it 
the perfect heartbeat to a dystopia
they decided to bring the lebanese experience to america
I can't even stand how common boosted subwoofers have become in cars over the past 10 years. Makes me want to hide in the woods.
your comment could have been made any time in the last 3 decades
Has it been exponential or something? Because my walls shaking feels much more regular now.
I thought it was worse 10-15 years ago, personally
the fad started late 80s/early 90s 
It started then, but it's really seemed to go from a rarity to a constant.
Some fighters flew overhead when I was at the grocery store ages ago (I think it was some escort for the president of 
) and it sounded like a bomb went off or something
A few years ago I was hiking in the middle of fucking nowhere, Utah, just enjoying the red rocks and seclusion, when an F18 rocketed directly above the slot canyon I was meandering through, banking hard to follow the general direction of the canyon and utterly frying my tympanic membranes for the next few tens of minutes.
I'm sure the military hardware fetishists would say I missed an opportunity for some kind of iconic photo of a fighter jet zooming through a frame of sandstone but all I could think about was how hard my ears were ringing and how disruptive that bullshit must be to literally all hearing wildlife.
I was maybe 100 feet below the top of the canyon and the jet couldn't have been more than 500 feet above that.
This is all to say that if commercial aviation starts getting loud in places where I try to enjoy the nature I too will likely lose it
Drawing attention to the rich by making them annoy people on a daily basis is the kind of failing empire shit you'd expect. Every single time you hear one of these among other people is a moment to use to agitate.
The point is that there won't be any audible "sonic boom" anymore, and afterburning engines won't be used, so the engine sound and fuel consumption will be less of an issue. Boom technologies flew a technology demonstrator, the XB-1, at supersonic speeds earlier this year without a sonic boom being audible at ground level. The aircraft flies at high altitude at low supersonic speeds (Mach 1.1-1.3 for the XB-1) and the sound waves from the sonic boom get diffracted back towards the horizontal by the warmer thicker air at lower altitudes, so there is no audible sonic boom at ground level. The phenomenon is called Mach cutoff. Flying at supersonic speeds without the use of afterburner to cruise or accelerate to supersonic speeds is called supercruise. The plan™ is to scale this technology up for larger aircraft, such as 50-100 seater passenger aircraft like the Boom Overture concept (does not exist yet outside of CGI rendering). Even low supersonic speeds would decrease in flight time significantly. Cruising at Mach 1.35 is 50% faster than cruising at Mach 0.9 for example.
Is this realistic and commercially viable? I don't know, it seems very expensive for a few luxury fast flights. But the technology is there, as long as the financial backing is there (the biggest obstacle to viability), it's technically possible. Supercuise and Mach cutoff solve two of the biggest issues commercial supersonic flight had previously with the Concorde. Comac in China wants to do something similar in the future. The question then becomes how much people are prepared to pay for 50% shorter flights, and how much the cost of supersonic flight has been reduced by improved technology.
The question then becomes how much people are prepared to pay for 50% shorter flights, and how much the cost of supersonic flight has been reduced by improved technology.
My main questions center on how much extra fuel is required to provide all that additional energy? Idk enough about fluid mechanics to answer this on my own: how much more energy does it take to accelerate from mach 1.1 to mach 1.2 vs mach 0.9 to mach 1.1?
it's not acceleration, it's air friction vs plane geometry, supersonic airflow has different optimal characteristics both for engines and flight surfaces/wings (naive kinetic energy is just differences of speed squared though).
But performing the Mach-cutoff flight “burns more fuel on the same distance than both subsonic and supersonic flight”, says Liebhardt. That makes it less economically viable than a regular supersonic flight and “the worst speed to fly at for fuel economy”. He sees Mach-cutoff flights as being more of a niche use case for “supersonic business jet users”, rather than for commercial airlines.
seems like they get shit of both worlds tbh with fuel economy (not zoomy enough to just cross distance fast with godawful fuel consumption/not optimized enough for flight at those speeds via engine regimes/geometry (that part might be fixable, but depends on how long it spends on subsonic climb/descend part of journey)
oh that makes so much sense thank you!
BUILD TRAINS I AM BEGGING YOU
Unfortunately Trump is......trainsphobic 
We need a trains megathread.
I want to hear the opinion of a commercial airline pilot who got very good grades.
Yea, what does Nathan Fielder think about this?
I wonder how this will interact with the multiple red states banning contrails
multiple red states banning contrails
Is that a ~15 year-old Onion bit made real?
I think that's how they've been getting most of the plotline lately.
plotline
I hope the beings that control our reality aren't like Hollywood execs. If they are - this week will surely feature death and mayhem.
We live in a capitalist hellscape, it always does.
depends on if they fly within range of the anti-contrail patriot batteries
Even if this goes through, it would take many years for anyone to develop a supersonic passenger jet because no one has been working on a design for one because no one has seriously floated the idea of lifting the ban. I doubt they're even worth it to the airline companies, since they're now essentially banks first and foremost, thanks to them all cashing in on having their own credit cards, who just happen to have airliners.
Comac C949: China unveils quiet supersonic jet with ultra-long range | SCMP
it's gonna be pretty funny if Trump makes the C949 a reality
I can see it already, "Only big strong American jets are allowed to be supersonic, nobody else"
NASA has been working with Lockheed Martin on the X-59 aircraft for several years, but we are still decades away from civilian supersonic flight.
While they're not efficient enough fuel-wise that an airline would pick them up, Concord jets do exist.
Even just hearing the air brakes from semi-trucks on the interstate, a mere 300 feet from where I live, drives me nuts. Hearing sonic booms with any regularity would tip me over the edge
yeah, but fuel economy doesn't make sense even for transatlantic porkies.
although local porkies getting gulfstream supersonic edition would be funny
Boeing 737 Max Supersonic
Brought to you by windows 11... You'll need many more windows now!
The old ban was for flight faster than Mach 1, yet was ostensibly put in place due to outcry over sonic booms. Well, if it's sonic booms that people care about, that is an issue of (loud) shock waves. The executive order instead asks for an interim regulation based on noise, the actual part of sonic booms that people take issue with and which is actually fixable. So, it's good!
The other issue is the energetics of supersonic flight. It takes more fuel, and thus pollutes and costs more, and is thus also for the rich only. All true. The only way to address the environmental factor is to bring down the cost of synthetic aviation fuel by greatly increasing green energy production. By the time a supersonic airliner is ready to fly in a couple decades, China will probably be able to do this assuming the administration(s) in Northern America are willing to import.
If they go mach+ only at altitude, don't think it'll be a problem. Back in the 90's as a kid I lived near a military bombing range in southern California. Jets would often be flying supersonic. It shook the walls just as much as the actual bombs sometimes. But they were already flying fairly low on approach to the range. It was hard to tell what was a sonic boom, explosions, or an earth quake sometimes XD. Then you'd have whole formations with apache helicopters and the cargo/fortress bombers with jets....
All that said, as long as they're only allowed to go supersonic at higher altitudes it shouldn't be an issue.
There has also been work done on supersonic planes that produce shockwaves that make much less noise.
Can you post the article text? It's paywalled and the archives don't have the full version.
Weird it wasn't paywalled for me. At work rn tho.
After stumbling to get on a plain, is he going to ban stairs to a plane?
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --