122

Ok so how does a cancer kill its host?

It grows until it consumes so many nutrients that the other living cells don't get enough. The host literally starves even if he eats plentifully.

The same applies for the US: The billionaires are not only hoarding wealth, but by doing so they're crippling the economy for workers and everybody besides themselves.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago

At this point radical measures are necessary to right the wrongs committed by the rich. Taxes are a good start but not enough.

[-] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

Jail sentences,

countless are dead due to billionaire greed. they are directly responsible.

life sentences for billionaires

[-] huquad@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

Jail them and spend even more money? Naa, just eat em

they rich are an ethical source of protein

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago

There is no law providing for such a sentence, so what you are talking about is either "make billionaireism illegal" or "extrajudicial punishment". In the case of the former, we need a Guillotine Party to take over the DNC much like the Tea Party took over the GOP. Or, we need a guillotine party, French Revolution style, to resolve the problem-class at its source.

If I have a company, where I intentionally make choices that kill my costumers, that would make me liable for manslaughter, me and anyone involved in the deaths. why healthcare billionaires are not liable?

same with every other billionaire who profits from human suffering and deaths.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HalifaxJones@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Overnight massive protests at their places of residence will help

[-] jonesey71@lemmus.org 23 points 3 weeks ago

Every person who kills a billionaire does so in self defense.

[-] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 weeks ago

Literal parasites who consume everything and offer nothing in return

[-] asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 weeks ago

The (original) Nazis are rightfully considered monsters for killing millions of people in the 20th century. What will any survivors of the incineration of earth consider the billionaires that are killing BILLIONS of us for greed?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sk1nnym1ke@piefed.social 15 points 3 weeks ago

Suppose you spend 1.000 dollar a day.

A millionaire would take roughly 3 years until he spent it all.

If Jesus were a billionaire and did the same. He wouldn't finished by today and would need another 700 years.

The numbers might be not exact but the point still stands: The difference between a millionaire and billionaire is ridiculous huge.

[-] tourist@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

There are roughly just under 3000 people on earth with more than a billion dollars.

They have a combined net worth of over $16 Trillion

Say the almighty Cthulu/Allah/Zeus decided "yo fuck those assholes" and instantly redistributed that $16 trillion among all 8 billion+ people on earth equally

Everyone: Every man, woman and child would get just a bit shy of $2000.

Fun thought experiment

[-] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

People think they understand numbers like billion because they understand thousand and billion is just thousand times thousand (million) times thousand. Multiplication is fairly intuitive, but exponentiation is not. Without explicitly thinking it through people feel like 1000^3 is not very different from 1000 * 3.

[-] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's the same reason the lottery fools so many people into gambling their money away.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ketchup@reddthat.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

Correct, because the difference between a millionaire and a billionaire is roughly 1 billion dollars.

[-] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 weeks ago

I think what you mean to say is capitalism is cancer. There are books written on the subject.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 weeks ago

Figuratively, but yes, I agree.

actually yes, figuratively is the word that i should have used.

[-] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

Not a fan fat shaming that gets bundled in with that but basically. It's the vice of greed, plain and simple.

Like imagine rolling up to a potluck and just buying the table, leaving naught but a bag of chips for the rest of the party. Even if you can afford it, it's still a crime against your fellows.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Each billionaire is an individual problem AND allowing billionaires to grab and monopolize so many resources and even looking up to them is a systemic problem.

Without the systemic problem which is Capitalism and the shallow, greedy present day society, billionaires would be treated the same as other hoarders - seen mentally derranged and stopped from going too far for their own good and the good of others.

There will always be nutters, but if the social system we have wasn't broken, this very specific kind of nutter would never be allowed to cause the damage they do with their mental disease.

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You're right about the similarities, but having similarities is not what "literally" means. That word is so fucking overused.

[-] Hikuro93@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Been saying it for years. Sadly there are too many at the bottom mesmerized by the elite propaganda telling them "you can also be like me, if you work hard", as if they earned billions that way without any dirty tactics along the way, and despite even with success still needing such tactics to take more and more.

[-] errer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I am incensed by the use of the word “literally” here almost as much as I am incensed by the hyper rich denying the vast fraction of the human race basics rights and freedoms. Almost.

[-] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 weeks ago

I think OP used literally correctly here. They are saying that one possible definition of the word cancer can include billionaires as an instance. That's not the definition you'll find in any dictionary, but those lag behind the true language as it evolves.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Bocky@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Corporations with more than 1 billion are more of a cancer than individual billionaires

[-] otacon239@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

This was pretty much the point Agent Smith was making to Morpheus in his ‘virus’ speech.

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

jokes on them cancer dies with the host

[-] peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

At this point it's not violence, it's self defence.

[-] Nosey33@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

What are you talking about? Billionaires are what's saving this country! Everyone just needs to stop eating and be homeless. But also fuxk homeless people and you turn to drugs for comfort? Jail obviously. They're totally fixing everything! /S

[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

You know in hungarian we would flip this a bit on its head as we have a curse, "a rák vigye el", which means may cancer "bring them away"(kill them). I support this idea in this specific case.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
122 points (95.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

36273 readers
72 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS