296
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago

canceron should have been a dead giveaway

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

zyklon B?,mustard gas.

[-] anti_antidote@lemmy.zip 50 points 1 day ago
[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

made from crayfish

[-] BreadOven@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Nylon? To many things end with on.

[-] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 18 points 1 day ago

funnily enough, that is a DuPont thing, but hasn't find its way into everyone's blood yet.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

that is a DuPont thing, but hasn't find its way into everyone's blood yet.

Umm.. I've some bad news for you.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412024003374

[-] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 11 points 1 day ago

welp, guess this meme is even more true then.

[-] BreadOven@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, that's why I chose it haha.

Edit: I was just being salty in my original comment due to the meme being to vague and me being a chemist.

I'm not from the states but actually got to visit the DuPont plant that did nylon and Lycra. Also saw the river that once changed colour or something due to waste chemicals? I can't remember the story.

Regardless, I in no way support DuPont or any other company that is responsible for such damages as they have caused.

[-] ignotum@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

You're just not trying hard enough, it took me a while but i managed to jam it in there (very little room in my veins because of all the microplastics)

[-] BreadOven@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Now do it with Lycra.

[-] MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Except that they used the chemicals that do find their way into everyone's blood to make nylon. So it tangentially fits the meme.

[-] Gladaed@feddit.org 51 points 1 day ago
[-] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 74 points 1 day ago
[-] SW42@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago

Teflon is just the brand name. I believe it’s called Polytetrafluorethylene, thus ending in ne :)

[-] olafurp@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Known also as PFAS or forever chemicals

[-] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 day ago
[-] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

SW42 shall forever be remembered a hero, who saved the world from a dark path

[-] Tja@programming.dev 25 points 1 day ago

Teflon itself is quite good, getting it to stick to places is the problem.

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 41 points 1 day ago

Quite good, if you avoid the fact it's literally everywhere including the atmosphere, doesn't break down, and causes cancer. But who cares about such little things like cancer causing rain...

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Teflon itself is inert, but it's also not needed to avoid that food sticks in a pan. In a good prepared Steel pan food sticks less than in a Teflon pan and is way more resistant to damages. The food sticks in the pan, if you don't wait to add the food until it's heated enough, not for other reasons, mistake often don by normal users. Professional cooks never use Teflon pans.

Preparing a Steel pan non-stick

  • Clean the pan after buy it
  • Heat the pan on the kitchen
  • Add some oil and heat somewhat more until it smoke
  • After this, wait until i's cold enough and distribute and eliminate the oil film over the whole surface with an kitchen paper.
  • Done

After this, to fry something, add a little oil and wait until the oil has enough heat (test with the handle of a wood spoon, if it forms little bubbles on it in the oil, the temperature is OK), to add the food. It will never stick this way.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXEt-fhyCis

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago

Teflon itself is inert

About that

our findings suggest that PTFE-MPs-associated toxicity may be specifically linked to the activation of the ERK pathway, which ultimately induces oxidative stress and inflammation.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37419366/

Steel/iron > teflon for sure though.

[-] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Again, that's from getting it to stick to things. The smaller PTFE chemicals that make it possible to suspend Teflon in water are the problem.

[-] Rooskie91@discuss.online 35 points 1 day ago

Teflon is the brand name for for the chemical Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Making PTFE requires PFAS, which are the toxic part. Think of PFAS as little bits of chain varying lengths that get strung together to make the larger PTFE molecule.

The argument you're making sounds similar to something like "Fossil Fuels are safe, it's just the CO2 that's dangerous." PFAS contaminated water being released to the environment is an unavoidable by produce of making Teflon. You can only make Teflon as a solid without suspending the PFAS in water first.

Here's a pretty good video about the history, manufacturing process, and toxicity.

https://youtu.be/SC2eSujzrUY

[-] Rednax@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

There is one important note: you won't get cancer from the Teflon in your pans. You get it from the PFAS used to produce the pans. This means you don't have to throw out all your pans, as if they were made from lead and asbestos. Just make sure not to buy new ones with Teflon.

[-] ExFed@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

The argument you're making sounds similar to something like "Fossil Fuels are safe, it's just the CO2 that's dangerous."

I didn't read it that way at all. Their argument sounds more like "there's nuance that you're glossing over."

It seems that we all agree PFAS are generally nasty chemicals, some worse than others. Teflon (polytetrafluoroethylene) is just one of the "nicer" ones.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago

You can't make teflon without the PFAS though. It's like saying AIDS is completely different than HIV

[-] 9bananas@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

no it's more like saying "desalinated water is fine, it's the brine that's problematic."

which is true.

and the same goes for teflon:

the PFAS are toxic, not teflon itself.

glossing over that distinction is disingenuous...

yes, you can't make one without the other, true, but the end product is not toxic. that's an important difference you can't just ignore in order to say teflon is toxic, because a requisite material in (cheap) production is toxic.

because that's like saying desalinated water is toxic, just because brine is toxic..which is obviously ridiculous.

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 23 hours ago

ie if you already have a teflon thing, that teflon is non-toxic and there’s no point to just throw it out… avoid new things if possible because they byproducts are harmful, but disposing of existing product is unhelpful

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 23 hours ago

ie if you already have a teflon thing, that teflon is non-toxic and there’s no point to just throw it out… avoid new things if possible because they byproducts are harmful, but disposing of existing product is unhelpful

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

It's also what makes it cheap. Making Teflon other ways is much more expensive.

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's releasing a high amount of micro and nano plastics, and those are linked to different health issues including cancer.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724027232

our findings suggest that PTFE-MPs-associated toxicity may be specifically linked to the activation of the ERK pathway, which ultimately induces oxidative stress and inflammation.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37419366/

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

In Denmark there was until very recently a factory doing something with teflon. That shit got launched out the chimney and just rained down everywhere.

[-] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago
[-] FlordaMan@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Nah, Dupont invoiced everyone.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 8 points 1 day ago

monsanto tactics

[-] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, every factory that does "something" with Teflon probably wants to stick it to things, which are the problematic chemicals, not Teflon itself.

[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 9 points 1 day ago

In the same way Asbestos is a great material, just one small problem

[-] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Asbestos makes for a great cigarette filter material, though.

[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago

It is certainly... impactful for your lungs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nikls94@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago
[-] Dicska@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

Lethal when breathed in.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Does Teflon explain MAGA?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Nah, I'm betting on plain old lead.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
296 points (96.8% liked)

Science Memes

16272 readers
3867 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS