237
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] twice_hatch@midwest.social 46 points 1 week ago

Oh no, vulnerable 🥺 they need DEI? They need to be a protected class? 🥺

Surveillance is suddenly wrong when it's the peasants surveiling wannabe samurai? 🥺

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Evil thrives in darkness

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ninjabard@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago
[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

~~Vulnerable~~ Susceptible

Well, I'm sure they wouldn't give encryption keys away.

[-] railway692@piefed.zip 34 points 1 week ago

Oh? Are we giving them privacy?

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

if they have nothing to hide, they have nothing to fear

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, maybe it would be in our interests to make all government communications public access. If it isn't a matter happening outside our borders, have it open. Maybe a classification for certain discussions that requires they be released in a timely manner, and when reviewed by a 3rd party if any information is attempted to be hidden they are immediately removed from their position and an investigation starts as to whether the offense should be criminal.

The timely manner would have to be monitored as in "we are going to performing a drug raid" they get a warrant that allocates them 2 days to have discussions pertaining to that topic, organize and execute it. Then release all communications immediately following. If they don't believe they can perform it in that time they need to submit it in their warrant request as to the reason why, time period, and date the information will be made public.

If we wrote strict laws on it, the judges would be held accountable for giving out warrants brazenly, and the executive branch would be kept in check by such

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Maybe we should consider some sort of informational freedom act.

[-] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 week ago

I think they're less "vulnerable" and more "fragile"

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago

"Afraid of any sort of accountability"

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Federated solutions which can't be stopped, self hosted, and available via Fdroid.

Only real answer.

[-] wagesj45@fedia.io 21 points 1 week ago

Until Google revokes publishing privileges for side-loading applications. I think we'll have to go further and get used to making PWAs and regular websites.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago

side-loading

You mean "installing normally." "Sideloading" is fucking anti-property-rights loaded language.

[-] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

Good point. Wild how these ghouls have normalized their bullshit language.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

Do you have a better, simple word for what they're banning?

[-] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

installing?

downloading and installing programs.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

Google started using buzzwords of sideloading as to make a boogeyman security issue, to get people to side with them. its just installing, other than thier main store.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago

The irony is so rich.

To anyone that had doubts about governments putting restrictions on app stores, here is your proof. The level of power the current situation grants this duopoly is excessive and dangerous.

[-] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago

I thought we had all the proof we needed when Tim Cook and Sundar Pichai were snuggling up to Trump at dinners and the inauguration

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

google had been snuggling up to conservatives for a while, mostly around mid-pandemic, when they removed restrictions on not banning election denial, and then snowballed into right wing propaganda videos plaguing youtube ever since. they are part of the problem, even moreso than APPLE. and google recently made deals WITH ISRAEL to allow thier propaganda to fester the site.

[-] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

Google says a group of masked fascists kidnapping children from their beds is a "vulnerable group".

[-] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

To be fair, they did set expectations when they got rid of the "don't be evil" moto.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

google recently fellated trump and the gop. Google's youtube is pretty instrumental in drawing in more incel men to voting Rs, by platforming right wingers out of context , like kirk,shapiro, fox, ,,,ETC.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 week ago
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

aaand that's why we need to be able to install apps without their vetting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

If you ever want to know why capitalism turns into fascism, look into how many companies willingly and knowingly did business with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy.

IBM made computers to help the Holocaust, because the Nazis could pay for the service of the machines to be built.

Google is just a modern IBM.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Was ever any doubt who corporate America would side with?

[-] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

"Why dont you stupid Americans organize or something?"

They won't let us. We're trying.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago

The agents who implement state violence are not a group. They're agents of the state.

And now Google is directly collaborating with an oppressive autocratic regime.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

I wonder what happened behind the scenes

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago

Nope. Our tax dollars pay for their existence. They're not a vulnerable group, they're our employees.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago

For the rest of my life I will never forget that Apple and Google went out of their way to defend and protect the Nazi SS of our time.

Absolutely fucking evil and unforgivable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] scttgard@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The moment any real alternative to Apple and the iPhone is viable I will go all in. Fuck them both, please Linux phones come to save us, lol.

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

If Linux phones become viable, I'm willing to pay half the salary of the engineer who develops the Linux equivalent of Android Auto and Apple Carplay. As long as they live and work in a really cheap country lol

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Google Calls Gestapo Agents a Vulnerable Group, Removes Gestapo-Spotting App ‘Red Dot’

[-] gigachad@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

The 1 million dollar question: Would I be able to side load it with the new Google developer registration rules?

[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

~~Don’t~~ be evil.

[-] don@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

“Vulnerable” go fuck yourself with a white-hot steel dildo.

[-] Aljernon@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

Fucking Gestapo

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Vulnerable my aunts fanny. They aggressively terrorize everywhere they go. Go everywhere armed to the teeth and are not in any way shape or form threatened with anything or anyone that could harm them sufficiently to put them into a threatened category. This is just google telling us whose side they are on

[-] Vertelleus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why does it have to be an app? Why can't it be just a webpage?

[-] twice_hatch@midwest.social 9 points 1 week ago

Apps have more permissions than webpages in general

  • Better long-term storage
  • Better notifications when closed or not focused
  • Ability to make noise (I think)
  • Ability to run background services
  • Ability to run offline or on a weak signal without fighting the browser to make it cache you

Like PWAs exist but apps are supported better in general. And although a web app may work fine for reporting in general, if you want to alert people (I'm not sure if these apps are meant to act like a parallel reverse 911 system) apps do better

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
237 points (99.6% liked)

Not The Onion

18370 readers
370 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS