41
submitted 2 months ago by pegazz@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Title of the (concerning) thread on their community forum, not voluntary clickbait. Came across the thread thanks to a toot by @Khrys@mamot.fr (French speaking)

The gist of the issue raised by OP is that framework sponsors and promotes projects lead by known toxic and racists people (DHH among them).

I agree with the point made by the OP :

The “big tent” argument works fine if everyone plays by some basic civil rules of understanding. Stuff like code of conducts, moderation, anti-racism, surely those things we agree on? A big tent won’t work if you let in people that want to exterminate the others.

I'm disappointed in framework's answer so far

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Auth@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

Phew, for a second I thought Framework had actually done something bad. But its just supporting Hyprland which is somehow considered a far right racist project because an unpaid moderator was transphobic in a discord server. People are really trying to squeeze everything they can from this discord drama that happened years ago.

[-] HereIAm@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Or, you know, they are sponsoring a) a white supremacists who believes in the white replacement conspiracy theory who's in charge of omarchy and b) the project lead of (not just a discord mod) of hyperland. Two awful people that Framework absolutely deserve flack for supporting.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[-] Slotos@feddit.nl 17 points 2 months ago

First, Omarchy doesn’t need funding or partners. It’s backed by a Nazi multimillionaire.

Second, the whole apolitical argument is bullshit. Everything is political. Support for a distro that doesn’t really need support by nature of being a child of a Nazi multimillionaire is a support for that Nazi multimillionaire.

“We didn’t support them because of that” means nothing. The support still sends a message. Just like artist loses control over interpretation of their art the moment they release it, people lose control over interpretation of their actions the moment they act. Does it sound fair? Maybe not, but it’s how reality works.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

So should we all stop using Lemmy because it was made by a Tankie?

[-] Luci@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago

No we use Lemmy and make fun of the Tankies as revenge

[-] priapus@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago

Using Lemmy isn't giving that tankie money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

Certainly a tough question. Use Lemmy, okay, but would you send financial contributions to said Tankie? I wouldn't, and I would judge someone that did. I don't think anyone can be expected to evaluate the moral virtues of the developer for every technology they use. That's a supply chain nightmare. But, given the small number of people we directly sponsor, maybe then it's appropriate to have some standards?

As a non-US citizen, I actually consider /any/ American company that has not moved to be complicit in fascism. At the same time, I havn't completely stopped patronizing American companies, so I'm not living up to my own standard. I suspect everyone is a little hypocritical.

[-] loutr@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

It's literally impossible to use the internet (or even computers?) without patronizing American companies, at least indirectly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 months ago

Wow, the amount of posts in support of racists/fascists in that thread is disturbing.

Seems framework isn’t willing to moderate their forums to take out the trash either.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kepix@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

i dont think framework is big enough to factcheck every linux maniac

[-] StopSpazzing@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

100% this. They support many many different open source project and I read people are bitching when they havent had mich time to even respond?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vhstape@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 2 months ago

Anyone who read the thread will see that the OP pretty much dropped it after Nirav’s response. Framework is a tiny company without a PR machine for these occasions, and I doubt they knowingly sponsored a project based on the developers’ political ideologies. Let’s all take some deep breaths.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago

The elephant in the room more people need to pay attention to that many of us who work in IT are painfully intimate with.

Many IT people are hardcore libertarians who believe in some warped idea that they are where they are through their intelligence and hardwork while completely ignoring many of them come from backgrounds that afforded them the opportunities they are taking advantage of.

100% many of them are sexist, racist and bigoted pieces of shit that hide it at work because they're adept at masking the fact that a lot of them are borderline autistic at worst and neurodivergent at best.

This is also why you see such a deep investment in idiocy like AI, Bitcoin and other paradigm shifts. They all have their heads up their asses and feel they're better than everyone else.

Couple all this with the demographic being primarily white males.

Fuck talk to any woman who works in IT. It's changing yes, but Jesus Christ it's a cesspool in many ways.

Source: 25+ years in IT

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

i do want to point out how hard it is to even find out about the views of these people, if you just look up the names of the projects and aren't specifically looking for this information there's no way you'll find anything about it

even looking up the name of David Heinemeier Hansson, the more vocally bad of these, i had to go to the 5th link to find anything even vaguely mentioning his views

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

Isn't that a good thing?

I don't know about you, but I don't really care what the views of the owners of a business are. It only becomes a problem if they make those views plain.

[-] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Well, I guess he has tried to make his views fairly plain on his blog. it's just a bit hard to find unless you're looking for it

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

See.....when it comes to open source, it's a little different for me:

I don't support or condone any of these pricks, but I can mentally divorce, somewhat, the open source code contributions from the person, because their contributions are useful. If this was a closed source solution, it'd be different, because the code wouldn't be released into the community. There are a lot of weird, closet-dwelling shut ins that fall into the extremist margins.

A lot of early medical knowledge, for example, was acquired from.....less than morally clear ways. So do you just take that information and throw it away on principal? Does that make the death and pain of those people for nothing? Or do you use it and don't condone the person or their actions? This is a difficult moral choice to make that is heavily debated by philosophy, media, etc. There are entire SciFi TV episodes, movies, and books written about just such a debate.

That said, I don't know the usefulness of Hyprland. I've never used it and I feel like it's pretty niche, so I'm surprised Framework aren't telling this person to fuck off.

[-] vapeloki@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I agree. Just as a little reminder. Methadone was initially invented by literal Nazis. It was designed to Combat Opium shortage in field hospitals.

Nobody would say: hey, let us not use this extremely helpful drug because Nazis contributed a lot to it.

On the other side: I would never give a Nazi company money to produce it. Two different scenarios

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

To put it in terms of your analogy, it's one thing to use Mengele's research after he's been stopped. It's another entirely to give his research funding when he's actively running the program.

One is making use of knowledge that comes out of terrible things, the other is complicity that borders on collaboration.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago

The issue with that is the toxic/racist/homophobic/transphobic people will by their behavior push out people who would otherwise contribute to development of projects. To have a big tent you can’t tacitly accept bigotry.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

That’s really too bad. Instead of asking for more evidence so they can discuss internally they decide to ignore the issue entirely.

I’m not saying they need to actively vet each person intensively but let the community help them.

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Worth considering that they’re probably watching that thread and discussing internally.

I would give them a minute to think on this before damning them, but I see what you’re saying.

[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 4 points 2 months ago

Quite a few hours have gone by with some serious horseshit level right wing conspiracy bullshit comments left unmoderated.

That says quite a bit on its own.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I'm posting my take here before reading any comments, but I will be looking for validation or good counter arguments:

This feels like Framework admitting that the opensource community is too small to exclude anyone, or maybe that they feel they can't exclude anyone because doing so would damage their ability to do business? I'm not picking up a "we love nazis" vibe, I'm picking up a "nazis are fucking everywhere, what do you want us to do, for fucks sake" vibe.

I don't know how I feel about that yet.

[-] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 3 points 2 months ago

I get the impression a lot of people think that framework are a lot bigger than they actually are, in reality they are not much more than a start up

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rowdy@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago

That thread was a painful read. Framework laptop is off the wishlist.

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

I don't know who you're going to find that's better, all these big companies are inevitably supporting way more problematic individuals

[-] pika@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago

Exactly. As bad as we might think Framework is because of all this, what's a more ethical company to buy a laptop from?

Regardless, it's still important to call out problematic behavior when we see it.

[-] devfuuu@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

There are no alternatives, literally everything else is worse.

Framework did something bad. I hope the community keeps the pressure and they consider going back on the stupid decision. But it's still on top of the list as potential choices if I need a new computer, literally nothing else comes close.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Hyperland sounds more like edgelords.

The DHH fellow is a full on Nazi-style racist.

[-] warm@kbin.earth 2 points 2 months ago

Nah the hyprland guys are fucking bigots, not just edgy kids.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

isnt steam comments having the same far-right comments, honestly they are infesting every online space, with comment sections, with anti-woke comments, far right comments

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xyguy@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago

I would say most of the customers of Framework are the kinds of people who espouse the kind of antifascist ideology that that guy that started the thread does.

I don't think that the fascist sympathizer circle and the "willing to pay more money for an ethical laptop that isn't beholden to a big corporation for repair" circles have much overlap.

This is easy, "Framework doesn't support fascism or racism in any form. We support open source software and right to repair. Due to concerns with ideology in some of the projects we sponsor we are reviewing the projects we sponsor to make sure that they align with our values as a company."

The fact that they aren't willing to say so says plenty.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 3 points 2 months ago

This is unfortunate for sure. I want to give them a few days to respond for real, it's always possible they just didn't know about the issues here, but even in that thread they're brushing it off as though it doesn't matter. I'm not really sure what they get out of donating to these projects other than potential PR, anyway.

On a personal level I've recommended their laptops to people who have later bought them, and I was even looking at buying one myself to replace my aging macbook, but I don't think I can do that anymore while this is unaddressed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] calliope@retrolemmy.com 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

As a former long-time Ruby developer who also used Rails (Ruby since 2006, Rails came along for me later), I’ve always known DHH was a total douchebag.

It’s nice to know he’s being super obvious about it now. He’s always been awful. He’s just been slightly quieter about it, other than buying million-dollar cars and pretending he’s still relevant.

Edit to add that here’s a presentation talking about “The DHH problem” in 2014. The updates are darkly humorous.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] warm@kbin.earth 2 points 2 months ago

Ugh I hate reading threads like that, the amount of delusion, stupidity and ignorance really gives me no hope for humanity.

Just vile people, fuck off fascists.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
41 points (82.5% liked)

Technology

78179 readers
430 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS