35
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] punkfungus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

More research isn't a bad thing, but this really isn't news. If you're a nerd who's into lifting you'd already know that soy protein is a top tier source of all the important amino acids for muscle gain. And it's cheaper than whey.

It's also not very popular because the manosphere tells men that consuming it will feminize them. Yes, really. They took the "soy boy" thing very literally and ran with it off the deep end.

[-] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 month ago

People continue parroting this soy estrogen myth even years after it's been debunked too, it's annoying as hell. The phytoestrogen in question is more of an anti-estrogen and may be protective against excess estrogen.

If soy actually caused boob growth, the supplement industry would be all over that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I remember about a decade ago talking about tofu recipes with a colleague who lifted and ate a protein heavy diet.

An older colleague heard us and warned us that eating tofu would cause you to have a surplus of estrogen and make you more feminine.

He was telling this to a guy built like a brick shithouse who had eaten tons of soy protein for the better part of a decade.

It's that same old thing, something different comes along and some people just have to parrot anything that goes against that thing, even if it's complete and utter horseshit

[-] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

As a human survival trait we need to find a way to shut down misinformation. Knowledge is our path to survival as an animal. Like ants have teamwork and building, wildebeest have speed, plants photosynthesise, humans learn.

By creating and spreading misinformation you're chipping away at pretty much the only thing that keeps us in existence.

Bit of a broad-strokes extreme takeaway from your comment there, but it got to me.

[-] RamSwamson@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago

I recently decided to restart my routine after 8+ years of dickin' around and this is blowing my mind right now. What else has changed? Is creatine and NO2 still a thing?

[-] punkfungus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Creatine is still very much a thing, but I think everyone actually knows what it is and what it does and it's not treated as a magic bullet any more.

Mainly what seems to have changed is that steroids and TRT have exploded in popularity, and a scary number of under 18s are doing it.

Apart from that I couldn't tell you, it's all happening on Insta and TikTok now and I don't participate.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That's fine.

I'm a 40 year-old man and I'll still post up next to a group of these Gen-Z pansies and put up 300 pounds on the bench with my gnarled, old man physique.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] LordMayor@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

Just to be clear, this is about supplements. It’s doesn’t say anything about differences in dietary protein.

The actual title:

Similar effects between animal-based and plant-based protein blend as complementary dietary protein on muscle adaptations to resistance training: findings from a randomized clinical trial

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

this is about supplements

And supplements are largely unnecessary, so this study says absolutely bupkis.

[-] LordMayor@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Right, for the average person, protein supplements are unnecessary as long as they are healthy and eat well.

Athletes (and people with body dysmorphia 😬) might struggle to get enough protein in their diet. But, far too many people think they’re in a position that would warrant supplements when just a little attention to diet is sufficient.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

Now let's have a control group with no supplements

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[-] miked@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago
[-] greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Oh yeah, I forgot about this. It's going to be tough to do anything about this with the current administration in office.

Also there's arsenic is lots of brown rice. I think the stuff from California or India is pretty safe.

[-] reddifuge@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

You're exposed to far more lead and other heavy metals living near a road than with this. So no, not a measurable amount.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Amino acids are amino acids. Some are harder to get from plants than others.

[-] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I wish more people understood that EVERYTHING is chemistry.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Might want to look into the levels of lead in their blood.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Study does not say anything about the diet of the subjects. This would make more sense if it was 22 vegan men with plant-protein supplement and 22 carnivore diet men with animal-protein supplement and a control of typical diet with no supplement.

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Even better is if they controlled for total protein intake, since we know that to be an important factor in muscle growth.

[-] vga@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I am slightly surprised that both groups lost a similar amount of fat.

Oh, right, supplements. So similar amount of fat as well. Well, kind of an obvious result and doesn't really say a whole lot about the differences between plant- and protein-based diets.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

There’s plenty of other factors that need to be considered. There will be significant differences in iron levels, b12, calcium, vitamin d, etc.

If you’re vegetarian/vegan, you absolutely need to monitor multiple other levels and take the appropriate supplements. Pretending otherwise is really dangerous.

[-] RBWells@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

There was no control group doing the workouts without protein supplements?

load more comments (2 replies)

Also FYI: if you are getting enough calories, you are almost certainly also getting enough protein. The RDA for protein is quite low, 0.8g per kg bodyweight, or about 10% of your caloric intake. You can meet this by eating just grains. However, as mentioned in the linked source, the RDA is intended to prevent nutrient deficiencies, not provide an optimal level of intake.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
35 points (97.3% liked)

science

22672 readers
3 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS