51
submitted 1 week ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 days ago

F150s will kill a lot more people though

[-] Sims@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 days ago

But at what cost ? ..no, wait.. never mind..

[-] eleitl@lemmy.zip -4 points 6 days ago

I've read analysts who say that the price is unrealistically low. I think the same.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 days ago

That's right, if one thing western analysts are famous for it's never being wrong about China's tech capabilities.

[-] eleitl@lemmy.zip -5 points 6 days ago

It's economics. Materials and even the fuel used by hypersonics (as in maneuvrable high-Mach glide vehicle) have a certain price tag, even in China. 100 kUSD buys far too little of that, even in Russia and China.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 days ago

wait until you learn about economies of scale and the benefits of controlling the entire supply chain

[-] eleitl@lemmy.zip -1 points 6 days ago

Russia has that too, nevertheless Kinzhal and Kalibr (which are lower-Mach and don't carry a hypersonic glider stage) are both about 10 MUSD. Just the costs of JP-10/decilin are considerable already.

Depending on the specs, I'd assume the price to be a few MUSD, never under 100 kUSD.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago

Chinese industry and technical expertise absolutely dwarfs Russia

[-] eleitl@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago

In hypersonics Russia currently has a lead over China. Obviously they're going to catch up rather soon.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 days ago

Hypersonics cover a wide range of stuff, what this article discusses are cheap low end missiles as opposed to something like Oreshnik.

[-] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Chinas economy buff is crazy. If you could compare the buffs between US Logistics and China Economy, I think you’d be surprised. In both cases, they are capable of witchcraft.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago

Even if it's 10 times more expensive it's still half to quarter price of Tomahawk missile.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 week ago

yet, the F150's are considerably more destructive to the planet. lol

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 week ago

this is what it looks like when your military procurement isn't centered around the profit motive

[-] Greg@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago

The missile probably has better range too

[-] ashenone@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

But can you put a massive non functional lift kit on the missile?

[-] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Depends, are you China? Because if not, then probably not.

[-] FatVegan@leminal.space 3 points 1 week ago

Cool, two super pointless things that cost a lot of money.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 week ago

Not so pointless when the burger reich is surrounding you with military bases.

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
51 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

40547 readers
98 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS