168
submitted 1 week ago by micnd90@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 70 points 1 week ago

Cato Institute

Of fucking course it is. Are these people even relevant anymore? Their whole thing is to present some sort of "academic justification" for making everything worse, but the modern republicans don't give a shit about respectability politics.

[-] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago

Cato Institute sounds like a badass organization in a sci-fi story, but nope, just ghouls kitty-birthday-sad

[-] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 week ago

In my fanfiction version of reality they were subject to a hostile takeover by the Tecate Institute.

[-] micnd90@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Tecate Institute sounds like a banger hot sauce brand

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 65 points 1 week ago

Over the past year, blue-collar wages rose 3.8 percent while supermarket prices rose 2.7 percent.

Those bastards. Grocery prices went crazy in 2022 primarily and people still haven't recovered.

[-] micnd90@hexbear.net 74 points 1 week ago

Over the past year, blue-collar wages rose 3.8 percent while supermarket prices rose 2.7 percent. Over the past two years, wages increased 8.1 percent compared with a 4 percent rise for food. Over 10 years, wages rose 49.5 percent, prices 29.7 percent

Notice how they didn't mention "blue-collar" anymore for the comparison of the past 2 and 10 years - this is because they use average wages and most wage growths were in the top percentile. This piece got roasted by their own readers https://archive.is/erMlS

[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Regardless, fuck them for lecturing the BS you and I go through every single day.

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

focusing on food prices alone is also a tell because everything else has exploded in price way faster, negating the wage gains anyway

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 11 points 1 week ago

Food prices, energy prices, rent/mortgage prices, health care prices, and insurance prices rose. But yeah, tell me how my increased wage covers all that.

[-] BoxedFenders@hexbear.net 54 points 1 week ago

Now try this argument for housing, insurance, and education costs.

[-] sourquincelog@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago

Shit, I just did this calculation on an alt.

I compared the minimum wage and purchase price of my home when I bought it versus when the previous owner bought it

1988 purchase price: $48,000

1988 minimum wage: $3.35

Number of hours needed to work to pay for home: 14,328

Compared to

2021 purchase price: $545,000

2021 minimum wage: $13.25

Number of hours needed to work to pay for home: 41,132

House prices increased at 3x the rate of wage growth

[-] BoxedFenders@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

Yeah, this chart says it all:

And it's only going to widen for the foreseeable future due to historically low inventory and slowdown of new homes being built. Plus you now have to compete with venture capital buying up homes in any area with a competitive job market. And there's also the tricky dilemma with interest rates- the currently high rates make mortgages more expensive, but when they lower demand will skyrocket and inflate real estate prices.

[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

We may have to find places with permissive zoning code, and build stuff with less embodied energy that's intended for higher density.

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

I make like 17.50/hr. Im a chef

My dad said some shit about 1977 or 1978 being the worst year for the economy ever

Minimum wage in 1977 was something like only 20% less effectively than what Im being paid now. For somewhat skilled labor.

Minimum wage jumped up 10% in 1978 too

[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If we can get to a point where it’s the porks taking up most of the right’s energy by condescendingly explaining, the better.

Please porky, lecture us all on how rent being a luxury is a good thing, actually. Piss off enough people.

[-] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

Rightwingers only care about oil prices and luxury vehicle prices.

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 38 points 1 week ago

burger prices say otherwise

[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago

I can’t even afford to imagine a burger anymore for my analogies.

[-] adultswim_antifa@hexbear.net 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm turning into a crypto gold bug. Don't get me wrong, the gold standard is stupid as fuck but here they are arguing that everything is fine because food inflation is actually lower than wage inflation. Just don't look at housing prices or gold prices over the last few years. Inflation is clearly always higher than they claim.

What produced these gains is not mysterious. Better seeds, fertilizers, machinery, transport, refrigeration, packaging, inventory management and data systems all raise agricultural productivity. Competition in retailing and global trade further push producers to deliver more nutrition for each hour of work on the demand side. The result shows up not only in fuller supermarket shelves but in long-run trends in wages, prices and time prices.

So food should be getting cheaper then? Well, yes they argue that, in a sense, food is getting cheaper. Just not literally cheaper. No wonder nobody has any savings. No wonder everyone's in debt. I don't think capitalism could survive true price stability with the rate of profit of being as low as it is. Marx apparently never realized how fake the economy could get.

[-] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

No, this is part of the irrationality of the system that Marx talks about. Unless we actually are able to organize, it will get to a point where there is an expectation to take on debt simply to be alive. Not even medical, just simply exist. We will bring back slavery.

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago

Such a deal paying $15 for coffee!

[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Porks win the loyalty of the poor by portraying their opponents and even centrists as lecturers

proceeds to lecture the working class themselves.

Bold strategy, Cotton

[-] Carl@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago

"time needed to earn the money" meanwhile more people every year are working less than full time hours as more jobs get gigified or reduced or removed.

[-] Rey_McSriff@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

I earn less now than I did in 2020 for doing a job with the same title :smileblob-no-thoughts

[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Instead of comparing groceries to overall earnings (GDP), they should compare a grocery basket to the median wage.

It's quite possible that a low-budget vegan diet is still reasonably affordable, for now.

[-] doubledealer@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago

Measure the time needed to

Nah, I'd rather measure this lumber, rope, and very large blade that can be used to slice watermelons in half

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago

With respect to both the arc of history and compared to other countries, food in the US is abnormally cheap due to a combination of subsidies and environmentally destructive overproduction. But the current price hikes are not reflective of an economy rebalancing itself with nature and directing more resources to the agricultural workforce, and they're putting pressure on people because the economy is designed to extract wealth from people in so many other ways.

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

With respect to both the arc of history and compared to other countries, food in the US is abnormally cheap

What countries because my eyes regularly fall out of my head when I see US grocery prices from across the pond

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

As a proportion of income, overall food expenditures are lower:

Standard caveats apply, this doesn't minimize the struggles of our food insecure population and the benefits are not evenly distributed.

[-] Fossifoo@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

I get that a lot of people have it worse than me as a highly privileged European. However I also "couldn't" pay 50% of my income for food because that amount of money is already going to my landlord... I wonder how that quota should look like in a fair society.

[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

If the GDPpc is about $200 per day (it's higher than that), <7% translates to below $14 per person per day on food spending.

Most people I know work jobs that are anchored close to minimum wage, and among these I'm still unusual for spending less than $10 a day on food.

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago

Whoever wrote this should have incredible violence inflicted on them

[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

The cowards didn't include a by-line.

[-] Tabitha@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago

Measure the time needed to earn the money to pay for a meal.

LGTM econony

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

fucking hell I hate when trueanon is right

It's the end of the mass market. how-much-could-it-cost is now everyone's target demo

[-] segfault11@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

the great vibecession never ended

[-] Hyper_red@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago
[-] onwardknave@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

They want to test out all the toys that Raytheon et all developed and built for the military using tax money, which were then sold to bloated police departments paid for by tax money, to blind and disable protesters who paid for health care out of pocket when they didn't meet their deductibles because they had to get the cheapest plan available because they had no money left after paying taxes to fund the genocide machine. Circle of life. Or something.

[-] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago
[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

We need to start peddling this out-of-touch shit around and for once leave chuds holding the bag.

I want it to be perceived chuds are the ones talking about “muh vibescession” or “hey poors, what are you complaining about? The stock market is thriving!” Trump gave up the ghost on housing recently that he doesn’t want to do anything about expensive housing because “muh property valyooz!”

[-] UmmmCheckPlease@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

“Have you all tried eating cake instead?”

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
168 points (99.4% liked)

news

24484 readers
520 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS