320
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Philosoraptor@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Terrible work, everyone.

Link

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 114 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Looking at liberals who refuse to even CONSIDER putting up an actually pro-climate candidate like

[-] zifnab25@hexbear.net 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

liberals who refuse to even CONSIDER putting up an actually pro-climate candidate

I got a push poll from my Congresswoman, Liz Fletcher (D), accusing her biggest primary race rival of being a far-left extremist who would destroy the Houston economy with his climate alarmism. The poll also accused him of sponsoring Hamas terrorism and being weak on women's rights because he wouldn't negotiate on an abortion bill.

Still a little squishy on Pervez Agwan, but Fletcher's poll did not help her case.

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 51 points 1 year ago

Political polls be like:

Do you support: (A) TERRORIST DEATH AND VIOLENCE (B) RAINBOWS AND SUNSHINE

Published results: 99% of people support ME!

[-] zifnab25@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

Its more:

How would you feel if you knew that Candidate A loves kittens and personally donated $50000 to the SPAC, has six shelter kittens of her own, and has advanced legislation to fund a study that will guarantee all cats receive adequate housing, food, and medical care without raising taxes or increasing the national debt?

How would you feel if you knew that Candidate B once kicked a stray cat over a fence, took money from an organization that refers to cats as "feral" and "unloveable", hates Garfield, and won't support the CATS Acts?

Okay, thank you for your response.

Now, having heard those messages, would you feel more inclined to support Candidates A, C, b, or D?

[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

Houston had not only like 100+ days of 100 degree weather, but we were also entering emergency water management conservation AND fire danger all over texas. It also doesn't help that Houston has a chemical plant explosion every other month. The idea that the economy and climate are separate it's so unhinged. Who is her opponent?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 64 points 1 year ago

I see you're complaining about climate change again.

Have you personally spent your entire life recycling everything you can, composting all organic materials you touch, eliminating all red meat intake, planting multiple trees per year, growing your own vegetable and fruit garden in the backyard of your house which you own, avoiding purchasing any plastics despite everything being packaged as such, not buying anything anything beyond your extreme basic necessities, never flying in an airplane for any reason, preferring to keep anything broken and virtually unusable instead of replacing it since repairing it is either unavailable or too expensive, and only riding ebikes or only driving Teslas to save the environment?

No? Then you're the real problem and you can't complain. smuglord

[-] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

growing your own vegetable and fruit garden in the backyard of your house which you own,

What's funny is I started doing that years ago less for the reduced carbon footprint of growing stuff that actually thrives in my local climate compared to buying produce from a grocer and more as a zen-finding exercise so [redacted]

[-] pillow@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

gardening is cool mainly bc it encourages people to eat plants but for most foods the carbon footprint impact of growing locally is basically nothing

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] privatized_sun@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

composting all organic materials you touch,

oil executives are made out of backwards chiral proteins, probably aliens

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pillow@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

I mean you should be trying to do some of these as much as possible...

big "oh you claim to care about animals but you still eat cheese then you're the problem" vibes, like... yes, that is actually correct?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cigarette_comedian@hexbear.net 101 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When I was young, they told me we were working on new technology and it was going to stop the climate issue.

.

When I was young, I saw polite little PSA's in magazine's telling me not to shower too long.

When I was young, I heard of the hydrogen car.

When I was young, I watched the crocuses grow in the spring.

When I was young, the snow fell on the correct dates.

When I was older, I realized the scope of it all.

When I was older, we were setting up the wind turbines.

When I was older, they were testing out new tech to harvest energy from currents.

When I was older, I saw my first electric car.

When I was older, we got new recycling bins.

When I was older, my neighbor threw his oil-heater out.

When I was older, I learned that cold melt water from the pole was slowing the Golf stream.

When I was older, I saw no crocuses.

When I was older, it snowed a day in May.

Today, I fear for it all.

Today, we are throwing the wind turbines in the trash after their use-life ran out.

Today, I know we don't use solar panels cause it'd make electricity too cheap.

Today, they had posters begging us to sort correctly.

Today, I saw even more electric cars, and I knew they still ruined the climate.

Today, I looked outside, at the snow that came two weeks ago and stayed.

Today, it hit two degrees.

Will there be a tomorrow?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 95 points 1 year ago

Still huffing that "maybe China can do geoengineering" copium so I don't fucking kill myself

[-] coeliacmccarthy@hexbear.net 50 points 1 year ago

we're gonna see the global south independently start dumping calcium carbonate into the upper atmosphere within a decade, mark my words

i wish em luck

[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 60 points 1 year ago

Sulphate aerosols, probably. Calcium carbonate is better for land/ocean based geoengineering. But yeah: the potential for unilateral action with stratospheric aerosol injection in particular is very high. There's some evidence that doing it from the southern hemisphere will help mitigate some of the negative side effects, but that's still inconclusive. We desperately need to talk about the global governance of this stuff before we deploy it, but we won't.

[-] pillow@hexbear.net 50 points 1 year ago

I read a sci-fi novel recently where venezuela just went ahead and started dumping sulfates into the atmosphere without permission and the global north had a huge tantrum over governance and censured them constantly in the un etc, but nobody dared to actually stop them bc it was literally the only thing stopping the planet from turning into an oven 💀

[-] WayeeCool@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Geo engineering is peak liberalism because it is only a rational fix and not a suicidal thing to do if you believe liberal ideas of infinite sustained economic growth and civilizational progress being linear march forward while ignoring collapse happens at least once a century with total collapse every few centuries. A ~250 year average on the churn of history. I find it nuts there are people who believe human history is a steadily march of forward progress and economic growth rather than a series of stumbles, falls, and lurches.

Am daytime drunk...

The big problem with all these magic geoengineering fixes that allow petrol states to continue existing (looking at you Venezuela, US and Russia too) is when we have a global economic collapse or major conflict, the industrial mass production of sulfur compounds to pump into the upper atmosphere (a costly economic activity at any meaningful scale, not a minor undertaking) comes crashing to a halt and things are 10 times worse than they would have been without doing it in the first place. Everyone pushing this suicidal bullshit always leaves out the caveat that the mass production and release of geoengineering chemicals into the atmosphere if done for any significant period of time has to continue for the rest of human civilization or everything dies. Geoengineering allows us to kick the can down the road (something human civilizations strive at) on abolishing petrol states and enables a level of atmospheric carbon that couldn't happen otherwise because the changing climate would have caused wars and civilizational collapse that mean a lot of people die, empires fall, but most life on earth (and humans) still survive.

The geoengineering ideas and even people on the supposed "left" supporting it is what has me at this point believing all life will be gone from earth within three centuries max. That rather than 2 to 5 degrees we are going to trigger a greenhouse warming cascade like happened on Venus (earths twin) that early on crossed an atmospheric water vapor and methane tipping point. I'm sure there will be more magic fixes that attempt to mask rather than undo or stabilize. Carbon cycle breaks forever, is done. Issue isn't with the technical fesability but human behavior to date on a macro scale, I have to believe geoengineering will happen while the petrol states continue increasing their rate of carbon production due to the breathing room it creates. US keeps pouring money into discovering new fossil fuel reserves around the world, US Dept of Energy keeps inventing novel methods to find and exploit previously unreachable fossil fuel ie how to extract shale oil and gas via fracking. Global warming will be masked for 50 years to a century or two until there is a world war or economic collapse, at which point that century of global warming happens in less than a decade triggering a rapid series of catastrophic tipping points (endgame ones being inverted carbon sinks, clathrate gun, water vapor, etc) faster than anyone has means to respond.

[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

I did my postdoc on geoengineering, and I'm sorry to tell you that I basically agree with all of this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

Gonna be honest - if the Great Dying didn't kill off all life on Earth, I don't see even especially reckless human activity doing it either. CO2 from that period went from 400 ppm to 2,500 ppm for reference, and Earth got like 8-10°C warmer then. Even shitty capitalist market mechanics would have abandoned carbon emissions at this point. If you want to turn Earth into Venus, you need to actively make it your goal. I mean burning every single last drop of fossil fuel faaaar after it's stopped being profitable.

[-] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

As I understand it Venus is kinda locked in anyway at this point, halting all fossil fuel burning with nothing to mitigate the damage we've caused just roasts us faster because the exhaust literally blocks a bunch of sunlight

The copium is "new technology not invented yet might be engineered by China, who plans for the future beyond make line go up next quarter" since the alternative is we're all fucking dead and nothing any human being does has any point at all

[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

As I understand it Venus is kinda locked in anyway at this point, halting all fossil fuel burning with nothing to mitigate the damage we've caused just roasts us faster because the exhaust literally blocks a bunch of sunlight

It's not quite that bad. 2-3° is probably locked in (barring sci-fi technology like large scale carbon capture), but not the kind of runaway that would lead to Venus. You're right about aerosol masking hiding a lot of the impact, but that damage will be very front-loaded (since the residence time of the aerosols in the atmosphere is only on the order of months), and limited to probably a few tenths of a degree. Not nothing, but not enough for us to go Venus.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago

China, build the solar sunshade curry-space

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] kot@hexbear.net 60 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it's time to start making apologies for the lack of terror

[-] iByteABit@hexbear.net 55 points 1 year ago

gui-better to the big oil capitalists

[-] kozy138@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

Finally, someone speaking some sense.

[-] coeliacmccarthy@hexbear.net 50 points 1 year ago

born too late to live past 50, born too early to not be born because complex life on earth is extinct, born just in time to die

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 47 points 1 year ago

I'm sure the sun will move away from us any day now and we can go back to normal no-mouth-must-scream

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

geordi-no Putting sulfates in the atmosphere to dim the sun

geordi-no Putting a big sunshade between the Earth and the Sun

geordi-yes Pushing the Earth further away

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Kuori@hexbear.net 46 points 1 year ago

please god can we just start killing the people responsible before we turn our home into fucking venus

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bigbologna@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago

think reading this made me dissociate

[-] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 42 points 1 year ago

Welp, line goes up...

this-is-fine

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago

My heart yearns for The Terror.

Comrades, this scares me.

[-] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago

every day I get closer to adventure-time

[-] Rom@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago

Yeah but have you considered the oil industry shareholder profits?

[-] Bloobish@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago

this-is-fine It's been swell Holocene, hope whatever comes next does a better job than us...

[-] Poison_Ivy@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

Anyone else notice the USDA Growing zones have shifted a bunch too?

Some guy in Ohio noted that his area used to be 4b and is now 7b which is warm enough to grow limes. In the West Coast the change has been a creation of shitloads of microclimates all over the damn place.

[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

The USDA actually updated their zone map the other day to account for this. Some regions saw significant changes.

[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago
[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

what the fuck, how is this year so so much worse than last year?!

horror

[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 42 points 1 year ago

It's a very strong El Niño this year, for the first time since 2017. La Niña typically suppresses global average temperatures, while El Niño raises them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] anticlockwise@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And he said: Behold Adam is become as one of us, knowing good and evil: now, therefore, lest perhaps he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever...

We're going to need to get ready to throw absolutely everything we have at a worldwide climate revolution. Strife, misery, and death is coming regardless.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zifnab25@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

Ah, but its a balmy 72 degrees in late November right now, so actually everything is fine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] coeliacmccarthy@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

I've been asked didnt I think it odd that I should be present to witness the death of everything and I do think it's odd but that doesnt mean it's not so.

[-] waitingtodie@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

This is fine

[-] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

All posts must include a link to their source.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] plinky@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
320 points (100.0% liked)

news

23564 readers
671 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS