“I could recuse myself to help settle down the corruption cases building against me…. Naaaa, I’m a fucking Supreme Court justice, I AM the law”

we are well beyond anyone in the SC recusing themselves for any reason. these dems are smokin the reefer

Spoiler:
He won't

Urging Clarence Thomas to behave ethically is like urging an oil tycoon to put the lives and health of people over profits.

Neither is ever going to happen unless you force them to.

It really fucking sucks that this angry asshole who's primary motivation is getting revenge on the people who once tried to hold him accountable for being a serial sex pest has the ability to fuck the entire country for the rest of his life with zero recourse to stop him.

https://www.businessinsider.com/clarence-thomas-told-clerks-he-wants-to-make-liberals-miserable-2022-6?op=1

Is his wife facing charges for being a leader of the movement that led to Jan 6th?

"Who put this pubic hair in my Supreme Court?"

I swear the finger-wagging will work this time! Come on everyone, behave and follow the rules! /s

Seriously though, when will Dems key into the fact that the right doesn't give a fuck about rules or institution? They've been doing obstructionist politics since Obama. They are obviously not interested in playing fair or governing effectively.

So, at what point do Dems become complicit?...

*I am not saying; don't vote blue. Im saying we have to demand more from those who we elect before it is too late.

Its almost too late.

How about they stop "urging" the enemy to stop doing something, and instead of being feckless whiners, actually put on their big-boy pants and MAKE THEM!

He will if Dems pay him enough.

The problem is house democrats arent using speech to tell him. Loads and loads of $peech.

I'll take Things That Won't Happen for 200, Alex

The law: its muh!

"No" -Clarence Thomas

Narrator: He didn’t.

Could we start a go fund me so we could pay him to vote in favor of democracy?

This is the best summary I could come up with:

A group of House Democrats on Thursday called on conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from a case involving former President Donald Trump's eligibility to appear on Colorado's Republican primary ballot.

“This time, we must urge you to recuse yourself from any involvement in the case of Anderson v. Griswold, because your impartiality is reasonably questioned by substantial numbers of fair-minded members of the public, who believe you wife Virginia ('Ginni') Thomas’s substantial involvement in the events leading up to the January 6 insurrection, and the financial incentive it presents for your household if President Trump is re-elected, are disqualifying,” the lawmakers wrote.

“It is unthinkable that you could be impartial in deciding whether an event your wife personally organized qualifies as an ‘insurrection’ that would prevent someone from holding the office of President.”

Democratic Reps. Madeleine Dean of Pennsylvania, Glenn Ivey of Maryland, Gerald Connolly of Virginia, Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico, Jasmine Crockett of Texas, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Dan Goldman of New York also signed the letter.

But Thomas continues to face scrutiny for refusing to recuse himself from several other Jan. 6-related cases, including one involving whether Trump has presidential immunity from federal prosecution.

The Supreme Court last month denied special counsel Jack Smith’s request to step in ahead of the normal appeals process.

The original article contains 533 words, the summary contains 220 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

just give him a new pillow and he'll just fall asleep through it. if you tell him it costs a thousand dollars, he'll happily accept it.

So 5-3 to keep Trump on instead of 6-3. It's a bold strategy, Cotton.