384
submitted 11 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 218 points 11 months ago

Okay, then why did you change your name from Nimarata to Nikki?

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 78 points 11 months ago

Such a good burn. Haley the randhawa punjabi. I wonder how many of her supporters even know she's of Indian decent.

[-] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 54 points 11 months ago

See that's the thing, Republicans won't care about it until they really will. They can conveniently forget they hate minorites as long as the minority person is being as racist if not more racist and hateful than them. How do you think Thomas stays the token black friend of the GOP? How do you think the prick with a last name Cruz still stays in power in Texas no less? Same story has played out hundreds of times but people never learn that the "in" group always shrinks away from them

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 11 months ago

I don’t know what you’re implying. Also, you’re racist for asking the question. Over here in GOP-land, we don’t see color.

/s

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 32 points 11 months ago

Colbert made that joke for a decade and never once did conservatives realize it was pointed at them.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 15 points 11 months ago

It's actually racist to call someone racist

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Oderus@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

My Canadian uncle changed the spelling of his name to Luke from Luc to avoid having to explain the differences between English and French. Also my uncle is a douche.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 63 points 11 months ago

Haley: "The libs called it 'slavery', but I like to call it 'job placement'."

[-] hemmes@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

The prisoners with jobs...

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 50 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The constitution is quite racist. Has she never looked at the constitution? Oh right yeah, republican, she hasn't. Hey Nimarata, they later famously had to add a whole amendment to add equal protection under the law regardless of race, after you know, that whole civil war thing.

It was hard to get dumber after her civil war comments, but she found a way. This is even more mental gymnastics than all that lost cause BS. Like holy crap, you can't glance at any time period of American history without racism or its effects rearing its ugly head.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 45 points 11 months ago

The genocide essential to America’s foundation would disagree, you dumb ugly cunt.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

Also the whole 'black people are 3/5 of a human' thing in our founding document.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 45 points 11 months ago

Republicans are mentally defective.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Which would be fine, if they would keep that to themselves. Unfortunately, they want to rule over the rest of us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nougat@kbin.social 45 points 11 months ago

As a counterpoint, have you seen gestures broadly?

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 42 points 11 months ago

Sartre quote time https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7870768-never-believe-that-anti-semites-are-completely-unaware-of-the-absurdity

Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

They're just saying stuff. They may or may not believe it but that's irrelevant.

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago

Yes, of course. All those "independent contractors" that we imported from Africa were free to go whenever they wanted to. And who can forget the indigenous peoples who we "peacefully repopulated" into tax-free reservations. What, me racist? Surely you jest! /s

[-] Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago

Racists don’t consider them people

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Here’s the intro from Mississippi’s declarations of causes for seceding from the US:

Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization. That blow has been long aimed at the institution, and was at the point of reaching its consummation. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin. That we do not overstate the dangers to our institution, a reference to a few facts will sufficiently prove.

—-

If you want to see what the other states said as their primary reasons for trying to leave the United States, just read the first couple sentences under every state’s name. Spoiler alert, the south was super into African slaves.

https://www.battlefields.org/learn/primary-sources/declaration-causes-seceding-states#mississippi

[-] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Barbara Fields' full interview about the civil war clears up a lot of this "it's about slavery" nonsense. Some of the stories and correspondence she reads from former slaves are incredibly powerful, I shared my favorite below. The central point she makes throughout the interview:

“it was the battle for emancipation and the people who pushed it forward… it was they who ennobled what otherwise would have been meaningless carnage into something higher. When a black solder in New Orleans said “liberty must take the day nothing shorter” he said in effect that when we count out those who have died and survey the carnage is must be for something higher than Union and free navigation of the Mississippi River”

Spotswood Rice, a former slave, writes to Kittey Diggs, 1864:

I received a letter from Cariline telling me that you say I tried to steal, to plunder, my child away from you. Not I want you to understand that Mary is my Child and she is a God-given rite of my own. And you may hold on to her as long as you can. But I want you to remember this one thing, that the longer you keep my Child from me the longer you will have to burn in hell and the quicker you’ll get there. For we are now making up about one thousand black troops to come up through, and want to come through, Glasgow. And when we come woe be to Copperhood rebels and to the Slaveholding rebels. For we don’t expect to leave them there. Root nor branch. But we think however that we (that have children in the hands of you devils), we will try you the day that we enter Glasgow. I want you to understand Kittey Diggs that where ever you and I meet we are enemies to each other. I offered once to pay you forty dollars for my own Child but I am glad now that you did not accept it. Just hold on now as long as you can and the worse it will be for you. You never in your life before I came down here did you give children anything, not anything whatever, not even a dollars worth of expenses. Now you call my children your property. Not so with me. My children is my own and I expect to get them. And when I get ready to come after Mary I will have both a power and authority to bring her away and to exact vengeance on them that holds my Child. You will then know how to talk to me. I will assure that. And you will know how to talk right too. I want you now to just hold on; to hear if you want to. If your conscience tells that’s the road, go that road and what it will bring you to Kittey Diggs. I have no fears about getting Mary out of your hands. This whole Government gives cheer to me and you cannot help yourself.

(It’s not known if Spotswood had a showdown with Kittey but there are property records indicating he lived with Mary and his wife after the war.)

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

The civil war was about states rights.

What a cow.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

Keep in mind that Republicans live in an entirely different universe. For them, sentences like that may actually make sense, how would people from good old earth know? And who knows, maybe their next big thing is "Unicorns are real".

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Once again, she knows where her racist bread is buttered with white supremacist margarine.

Her self hating ass has always been willing to sell out minorities for money.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Didn't she say she was bullied for being brown?

*Yes according to the TLDR bot. Boy the mental gymnastics.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] diffcalculus@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

This has to have been taken out of context....

“No. We’re not a racist country, Brian. We’ve never been a racist country,” Haley said in response.

Well shit. At least she's sticking to her guns....

“I know, I faced racism when I was growing up. But I can tell you, today is a lot better than it was then,” Haley said.

...so she's an idiot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago

She's really having a lot of trouble remembering American history.

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

A lot of New Hampshire boys died fixing some of the racist problems of this country.

You got to win in NH before going full Dixie.

Amateur.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 12 points 11 months ago

So the people who had slaves and wrote the Constitution and shit weren't racist? Hmmm 🤔

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Question: Do you think pre-civil rights America would have forced Nimrata Randhawa Haley to use the colored entrance to a movie theater? Or would she be allowed to use the entrance reserved exclusively for whites?

Silly question! It doesn't matter because America has never been a racist country! Next question!

[-] Octavio@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

According to Florida history curriculum, she's right.

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Bitch, we were the template for the Nazis. The fuck you mean we weren't racist? Are racist, in most aspects.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

Reagan could get away with using dog whistles. Trump said the quiet part out loud and now there's no going back.

[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

Replace 'never' with 'always', and it'd be a factual statement. She's a coward trying desperately to just fade into the background now without having any facists follow her home. I have no sympathy for her.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 11 months ago

Cool, so I guess the Race Riots were incorrectly named, and segregation never happened. Phew!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

And therein lies her confusion with the root cause of the Civil War...

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In an interview on “Fox & Friends,” co-host Brian Kilmeade asked Haley whether she thinks the GOP is a “racist party.”

Drawing on her experience as “a brown girl that grew up in a small rural town in South Carolina,” Haley said she has experienced racism in the past but doesn’t want to raise her children to think they’re disadvantaged — a point she’s made before.

She added: “I don’t want my kids growing up where they’re sitting there thinking that they’re disadvantaged because of a color or a gender.

At a campaign event in recent weeks, Haley was asked about the cause of the Civil War, and she omitted any mention of slavery.

The discussion about racism came after Haley was asked to respond to a clip from an MSNBC host saying, “The elephant in the room, she’s still a brown lady that’s got to try to win in a party that is deeply anti-immigrant.

Haley responded by saying her credentials reveal the “American dream,” adding, “You can sit there and give me all the reasons why you think I can’t do this.


The original article contains 542 words, the summary contains 184 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] match@pawb.social 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

instead of teaching your kids that they're disadvantaged by racism just let them suffer and think it's their own fault if bad things happen to them :)

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

Ok Nimarata! I mean Nikki!

[-] iamjackflack@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

Hahahahahaha that’s a good one, oh wait she’s serious…

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
384 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19241 readers
1908 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS